GeForce RTX 4080 VS GeForce RTX 4090
We are comparing the GeForce RTX 4080 (NVIDIA) with the GeForce RTX 4090 (NVIDIA). Scroll down to the pros and cons of each graphics card, in-depth specs, and gaming benchmarks.
Last Updated: October 24, 2026
Overall Comparison
KEY DIFFERENCES OF GeForce RTX 4080 AND GeForce RTX 4090
Here’s how GeForce RTX 4080 and GeForce RTX 4090 stack up against each other in their most impactful areas.
Why GeForce RTX 4090 is the best choice:
-
21% higher 4K Ultra FPS (105 vs 87)
-
20% higher 1440p Ultra FPS (176 vs 147)
-
17% higher 1080p Ultra FPS (218 vs 186)
-
29% higher 3DMark Time Spy score (36315 vs 28164)
-
45% higher 3DMark Port Royal score (26128 vs 17979)
SPECIFICATION TABLE COMPARISON OF GeForce RTX 4080 AND GeForce RTX 4090
Below is the detailed specification table comparing GeForce RTX 4080 and GeForce RTX 4090.
Note: Highlighted specs mean that GPU wins that spec row.
If neither side is highlighted, it is a tie or there is not enough data for both specs.
| Specification | GeForce RTX 4080 | GeForce RTX 4090 |
|---|---|---|
|
General Info
|
||
| GPU Name: | GeForce RTX 4080 | GeForce RTX 4090 |
| GPU Type: | Discrete | Discrete |
| Codename: | AD103 | AD102 |
| Vendor: | NVIDIA | NVIDIA |
| Foundry: | TSMC | TSMC |
| Architecture: | Ada Lovelace | Ada Lovelace |
| Generation: | GeForce 40 | GeForce 40 |
| Release Date: | September 20, 2022 | September 20, 2022 |
|
Board Design
|
||
| Bus Interface: | PCIe 4.0 x16 | PCIe 4.0 x16 |
| PCIe Version: | 4.0 | 4.0 |
| PCIe Lanes: | x16 | x16 |
| Process Size: | 5 nm | 5 nm |
| Transistors: | 45 billion | 76.3 billion |
| Density: | 118.73 MTr/mm² | 125.29 MTr/mm² |
| Die Size: | 379 | 609 |
| Board Length: | 304 mm | 304 mm |
| Board Width: | 61 mm | 61 mm |
| Board Height: | 137 mm | 137 mm |
| Total Graphics Power (TGP): | 320 W | 450 W |
|
Graphics Processor
|
||
| Compute Units: | 76 | 128 |
| Shading Units: | 9728 | 16384 |
| Texture Mapping Units (TMUs): | 304 | 512 |
| Render Output Units (ROPs): | 112 | 176 |
| Tensor Cores: | 304 | 512 |
| Ray Tracing Cores: | 76 | 128 |
| Base Clock: | 2205 | 2235 |
| Boost Clock: | 2505 | 2520 |
| L1 Cache: | 128KB per cluster | 128KB per cluster |
| L2 Cache: | 64MB shared | 72MB shared |
|
Raw Performance
|
||
| Pixel Fill Rate: | 280.6 GPixel/s | 443.5 GPixel/s |
| Texture Fill Rate: | 761.5 GTexel/s | 1,290.2 GTexel/s |
| FP32 Performance: | 48.74 TFLOPs | 82.58 TFLOPs |
|
Memory
|
||
| Memory Type: | GDDR6X | GDDR6X |
| Memory Size: | 16 GB | 24 GB |
| Memory Bus Width: | 256-bit | 384-bit |
| Memory Clock: | 1400 | 2625 |
| Effective Memory Speed: | 22400 | 21000 |
| Bandwidth: | 716.8 | 1010 |
|
APIs
|
||
| DirectX: | 12 | 12 |
| Vulkan: | 1.3 | 1.3 |
| OpenGL: | 4.6 | 4.6 |
| OpenCL: | 3.0 | 3.0 |
| CUDA: | 8.9 | 8.9 |
| Ray Tracing: | Yes | Yes |
| DLSS: | DLSS 3 | DLSS 3 |
| DisplayPort: | 1.4a | 1.4a |
| HDMI: | 2.1a | — |
|
Gaming FPS
|
||
| 1080p Ultra (FPS): | 186 | 218 |
| 1440p Ultra (FPS): | 147 | 176 |
| 4K Ultra (FPS): | 87 | 105 |
|
Benchmarks
|
||
|
3D Mark
|
||
| Steel Nomad Lite | 30169 | 42154 |
| Time Spy | 28164 | 36315 |
| Solar Bay | 136859 | 187290 |
| Port Royal | 17979 | 26128 |
| Fire Strike | 64634 | 72272 |
| Wild Life Extreme | 59108 | 85225 |
| Night Raid | 184754 | 195744 |
|
GeekBench 6 OpenCL
|
||
| Compute Score | 217712 | 316301 |
| Background Blur | 250.4 img/sec | 318.9 img/sec |
| Face Detection | 190 img/sec | 222.8 img/sec |
| Horizon Detection | 9.56 Gpixels/sec | 14.2 Gpixels/sec |
| Edge Detection | 12.8 Gpixels/sec | 21 Gpixels/sec |
| Gaussian Blur | 15.3 Gpixels/sec | 23.9 Gpixels/sec |
| Feature Matching | 1.97 Gpixels/sec | 2.38 Gpixels/sec |
| Stereo Matching | 1130 Gpixels/sec | 1950 Gpixels/sec |
| Particle Physics | 28795.5 FPS | 48090.4 FPS |
|
Passmark Graphics
|
||
| G3D Mark | 34445 | 38098 |
| G2D Mark | 1249 | 1303 |
| DirectX 9 | 373 | — |
| DirectX 10 | 202 | — |
| DirectX 11 | 313 | 324 |
| DirectX 12 | 132 | 151 |
| GPU Compute | 20450 | 26273 Ops/s |
|
GFXBench 5
|
||
| Aztec Ruins High (4K) | 320.90 | 615.90 |
| Aztec Ruins Normal | 1476.20 | 1617.60 |
| Car Chase | 1250.00 | 1228.60 |
| Manhattan 3.1.1 (1440p) | 1062.90 | 1234.60 |
| T-Rex | 5492.10 | 6286.00 |
| Tessellation | 9274.80 | 12119.10 |
| ALU 2 | 9330.70 | 15073.40 |
| Driver Overhead 2 | 291.30 | 303.70 |
| API | OpenGL | OpenGL |
| OS | Windows | Windows |
|
Blender (Rendering)
|
||
| Blender Score | 8765 | 11795 |
|
GeekBench 6 ML
|
||
| Single Precision | 36799 | 42962 |
| Half Precision | 53331 | 59636 |
| Quantized | 28104 | 31670 |
| Image Classification | 13466 | 15600 |
| Image Segmentation | 34767 | 36657 |
| Image Super Resolution | 42687 | 48114 |
| Face Detection | 70927 | 78111 |
| Pose Estimation | 239350 | 289639 |
| Text Classification | 3606 | 4074 |
| Machine Translation | 6519 | 6349 |
| Object Detection | 18153 | 21186 |
| Depth Estimation | 65667 | 75599 |
| Style Transfer | 414848 | 601428 |
| Framework | ONNX | ONNX |
| Backend | DirectML | DirectML |
|
FurMark
|
||
| 1080p Vulkan | 15032 | 27475 |
| 1440p Vulkan | 8109 | 20403 |
| 2160p Vulkan | 7752 | 11883 |
| 1080p OpenGL | 20826 | 24851 |
| 1440p OpenGL | 21847 | 19078 |
| 2160p OpenGL | 15200 | 11425 |
Tip: ▲ indicates a higher-is-better spec advantage, while ▼ indicates a lower-is-better advantage.
PERFORMANCE CHART COMPARISON OF GeForce RTX 4080 AND GeForce RTX 4090
The charts below visualize how GeForce RTX 4080 and GeForce RTX 4090 stack up in key performance metrics.
Radar Chart Comparison
Bullet Chart Comparison
Release Timeline of GeForce RTX 4080 and GeForce RTX 4090
GeForce RTX 4080 and GeForce RTX 4090 were released on the same day.
Value For Money Calculator
Prices use available launch or current data. Enter your own prices to see which GPU gives better value.
GeForce RTX 4080
GeForce RTX 4090
Calculating...
Domain Score Summary
Scores are generated by Comparigon's scoring algorithm and are intended as a high-level guide. They may not map 1-to-1 with the individual spec-by-spec comparisons shown in the table.
Our Verdict
In conclusion, the GeForce RTX 4090 edges out overall compared to the GeForce RTX 4080. Its strongest advantages are in Gaming Performance, AI & Machine Learning, Hardware Architecture and Workstation. The GeForce RTX 4080 is the better fit if your top priority is Energy Efficiency.
Try to Compare Again One of These GPUs With Another GPU
Pick which GPU to keep, then search for the other GPU to compare.
Disclaimer: Specs, pricing, and benchmarks are sourced from official manufacturer data and verified test results. While we strive for precision, product details and pricing may change. Comparigon may earn an affiliate commission on qualifying purchases.