GeForce RTX 4070 VS GeForce RTX 5060 Ti (16GB)
We are comparing the GeForce RTX 4070 ( NVIDIA ) head-to-head with the GeForce RTX 5060 Ti (16GB) ( NVIDIA ) . You’ll get the key pros and cons of each graphics card, in-depth specs, and gaming benchmarks.
Note: This comparison of GeForce RTX 4070 vs. GeForce RTX 5060 Ti (16GB) is based on Comparigon's analysis and is for informational purposes only.
Last Updated: August 20, 2026
Overall Comparison
KEY DIFFERENCES OF GeForce RTX 4070 AND GeForce RTX 5060 Ti (16GB)
Here’s how GeForce RTX 4070 and GeForce RTX 5060 Ti (16GB) stack up against each other in their most impactful areas. Use these bullets to see at a glance which graphics card excels where.
Reasons to consider the GeForce RTX 4070
-
7% higher 4K Ultra FPS (62 vs 58)
-
7% higher 1440p Ultra FPS (106 vs 99)
-
8% higher 1080p Ultra FPS (140 vs 130)
-
11% higher 3DMark Time Spy score (17811 vs 16029)
-
10% higher 3DMark Port Royal score (11154 vs 10165)
Reasons to consider the GeForce RTX 5060 Ti (16GB)
-
4% higher Boost Clock (2572 MHz vs 2475 MHz)
-
33% more VRAM (16GB vs 12GB)
-
Faster memory type (GDDR7)
-
Higher bandwidth bus link (PCIe 5.0 x8)
-
Newer PCIe Version (5.0)
SPECIFICATION TABLE COMPARISON OF GeForce RTX 4070 AND GeForce RTX 5060 Ti (16GB)
Below is the detailed specification table comparing GeForce RTX 4070 and GeForce RTX 5060 Ti (16GB).
Note: Highlighted specs mean that GPU wins that spec row.
If neither side is highlighted, it is a tie or there is not enough data for both specs.
| Specification | GeForce RTX 4070 | GeForce RTX 5060 Ti (16GB) |
|---|---|---|
|
General Info
|
||
| GPU Name: | GeForce RTX 4070 | GeForce RTX 5060 Ti (16GB) |
| GPU Type: | Discrete | Discrete |
| Codename: | AD104 | GB206 |
| Vendor: | NVIDIA | NVIDIA |
| Foundry: | TSMC | TSMC |
| Architecture: | Ada Lovelace | Blackwell 2.0 |
| Generation: | GeForce 40 | GeForce 50 |
| Release Date: | April 12, 2023 | April 16, 2025 |
|
Board Design
|
||
| Bus Interface: | PCIe 4.0 x16 | PCIe 5.0 x8 |
| PCIe Version: | 4.0 | 5.0 |
| PCIe Lanes: | x16 | x8 |
| Process Size: | 5 nm | 5 nm |
| Transistors: | 35.8 billion | 21.9 billion |
| Density: | 121.8 MTr/mm² | 121.0 MTr/mm² |
| Die Size: | 294 mm² | 181 mm² |
| Board Length: | 240 mm | 241 mm |
| Board Width: | 40 mm | 40 mm |
| Board Height: | 110 mm | 111 mm |
| Total Graphics Power (TGP): | 200 W | 180 W |
|
Graphics Processor
|
||
| Compute Units: | 46 | 36 |
| Shading Units: | 5888 | 4608 |
| Texture Mapping Units (TMUs): | 184 | 144 |
| Render Output Units (ROPs): | 64 | 48 |
| Tensor Cores: | 184 | 144 |
| Ray Tracing Cores: | 46 | 36 |
| Base Clock: | 1920 MHz | 2407 MHz |
| Boost Clock: | 2475 MHz | 2572 MHz |
| L1 Cache: | 128 KB per SM | 128 KB per SM |
| L2 Cache: | 36 MB | 32 MB |
|
Raw Performance
|
||
| Pixel Fill Rate: | 158.4 GPixel/s | 123.5 GPixel/s |
| Texture Fill Rate: | 455.4 GTexel/s | 370.4 GTexel/s |
| FP32 Performance: | 29.15 TFLOPs | 23.70 TFLOPs |
|
Memory
|
||
| Memory Type: | GDDR6X | GDDR7 |
| Memory Size: | 12 GB | 16 GB |
| Memory Bus Width: | 192-bit | 128-bit |
| Memory Clock: | 1313 MHz | 1750 MHz |
| Effective Memory Speed: | 21000 Mbps | 28000 Mbps |
| Bandwidth: | 504.2 GB/s | 448.0 GB/s |
|
APIs
|
||
| DirectX: | 12.2 | 12.2 |
| Vulkan: | 1.4 | 1.4 |
| OpenGL: | 4.6 | 4.6 |
| OpenCL: | 3.0 | 3.0 |
| CUDA: | 8.9 | 12.0 |
| Ray Tracing: | Yes | Yes |
| DLSS: | DLSS 3 | DLSS 4 |
| DisplayPort: | 1.4a | 2.1b |
| HDMI: | 2.1 | 2.1b |
|
Gaming FPS
|
||
| 1080p Ultra (FPS): | 140 | 130 |
| 1440p Ultra (FPS): | 106 | 99 |
| 4K Ultra (FPS): | 62 | 58 |
|
Benchmarks
|
||
|
3D Mark
|
||
| Steel Nomad Lite | 18093 | 16214 |
| Time Spy | 17811 | 16029 |
| Solar Bay | 82720 | 75557 |
| Port Royal | 11154 | 10165 |
| Fire Strike | 44071 | 42431 |
| Wild Life Extreme | 35487 | 30099 |
| Night Raid | 153448 | 150693 |
|
GeekBench 6 OpenCL
|
||
| Compute Score | 167522 | 148626 |
| Background Blur | 233 | 243.1 |
| Face Detection | 141.7 | 149.5 |
| Horizon Detection | 6.62 | 5.35 |
| Edge Detection | 9.19 | 6.88 |
| Gaussian Blur | 9.2 | 7.76 |
| Feature Matching | 1.78 | 1.57 |
| Stereo Matching | 845.4 | 740.2 |
| Particle Physics | 25043.9 | 22183.7 |
|
Passmark Graphics
|
||
| G3D Mark | 26914 | 22700 |
| G2D Mark | 1168 | 1216 |
| DirectX 11 | 243 | 219 |
| DirectX 12 | 103 | 89 |
| GPU Compute | 14633 | 11373 |
|
GFXBench 5
|
||
| Aztec Ruins High (4K) | 192.00 | 171.70 |
| Aztec Ruins Normal | 1039.00 | 903.40 |
| Car Chase | 900.00 | 792.70 |
| Manhattan 3.1.1 (1440p) | 761.20 | 641.00 |
| T-Rex | 3848.10 | 2827.50 |
| Tessellation | 6200.70 | 5095.60 |
| ALU 2 | 5980.80 | 4413.60 |
| Driver Overhead 2 | 296.70 | 265.70 |
| API | OpenGL | OpenGL |
| OS | Windows | Windows |
|
Blender (Rendering)
|
||
| Blender Score | 5425 | 4338 |
|
GeekBench 6 ML
|
||
| Single Precision | 27166 | 24763 |
| Half Precision | 40963 | 47486 |
| Quantized | 20332 | 18826 |
| Image Classification | 10246 | 10281 |
| Image Segmentation | 26153 | 29909 |
| Image Super Resolution | 32054 | 26549 |
| Face Detection | 51337 | 59010 |
| Pose Estimation | 124617 | 117200 |
| Text Classification | 3703 | 3993 |
| Machine Translation | 5484 | 6647 |
| Object Detection | 13134 | 12742 |
| Depth Estimation | 50548 | 44856 |
| Style Transfer | 263477 | 175892 |
| Framework | ONNX | ONNX |
| Backend | DirectML | DirectML |
|
FurMark
|
||
| 1080p Vulkan | 12540 | 11900 |
| 1440p Vulkan | 8652 | 8514 |
| 2160p Vulkan | 3650 | 3626 |
| 1080p OpenGL | 11999 | 11275 |
| 1440p OpenGL | 9077 | 8415 |
| 2160p OpenGL | 4084 | 3922 |
Tip: ▲ indicates a higher-is-better spec advantage, while ▼ indicates a lower-is-better advantage.
PERFORMANCE CHART COMPARISON OF GeForce RTX 4070 AND GeForce RTX 5060 Ti (16GB)
The charts below visualize how GeForce RTX 4070 and GeForce RTX 5060 Ti (16GB) stack up in key performance metrics.
Radar Chart Comparison
Bullet Chart Comparison
Release Timeline of GeForce RTX 4070 and GeForce RTX 5060 Ti (16GB)
GeForce RTX 4070 was released 2 years, 4 days earlier than GeForce RTX 5060 Ti (16GB).
Value For Money Calculator
Prices use available launch or current data. Enter your own prices to see which GPU gives better value.
GeForce RTX 4070
GeForce RTX 5060 Ti (16GB)
Calculating...
Domain Score Summary
Note: Scores (0 to 100) are generated by Comparigon’s scoring algorithm and are intended as a high-level guide. They may not map 1-to-1 with the individual spec-by-spec comparisons shown in the table.
Our Verdict
In conclusion, the GeForce RTX 4070 has a narrow overall lead compared to the GeForce RTX 5060 Ti (16GB). Its strongest advantages are in Gaming Performance and Workstation. The GeForce RTX 5060 Ti (16GB) is the better fit if your top priority is AI & Machine Learning and Hardware Architecture.
Try to Compare Again One of These GPUs With Another GPU
Pick which GPU to keep, then search for the other GPU to compare.