GeForce RTX 4070 SUPER VS Radeon RX 6800 XT
We are comparing the GeForce RTX 4070 SUPER (NVIDIA) with the Radeon RX 6800 XT (AMD). Scroll down to the pros and cons of each graphics card, in-depth specs, and gaming benchmarks.
Last Updated: November 2, 2026
Overall Comparison
KEY DIFFERENCES OF GeForce RTX 4070 SUPER AND Radeon RX 6800 XT
Here’s how GeForce RTX 4070 SUPER and Radeon RX 6800 XT stack up against each other in their most impactful areas.
Reasons to consider the GeForce RTX 4070 SUPER
-
9% higher 4K Ultra FPS (71 vs 65)
-
8% higher 1440p Ultra FPS (121 vs 112)
-
3% higher 1080p Ultra FPS (153 vs 148)
-
10% higher Boost Clock (2475 MHz vs 2250 MHz)
-
8% higher 3DMark Time Spy score (20885 vs 19364)
Reasons to consider the Radeon RX 6800 XT
-
33% more VRAM (16GB vs 12GB)
-
33% higher Memory Bus Width (256 Bit vs 192 Bit)
SPECIFICATION TABLE COMPARISON OF GeForce RTX 4070 SUPER AND Radeon RX 6800 XT
Below is the detailed specification table comparing GeForce RTX 4070 SUPER and Radeon RX 6800 XT.
Note: Highlighted specs mean that GPU wins that spec row.
If neither side is highlighted, it is a tie or there is not enough data for both specs.
| Specification | GeForce RTX 4070 SUPER | Radeon RX 6800 XT |
|---|---|---|
|
General Info
|
||
| GPU Name: | GeForce RTX 4070 SUPER | Radeon RX 6800 XT |
| GPU Type: | Discrete | Discrete |
| Codename: | AD104 | Navi 21 |
| Vendor: | NVIDIA | AMD |
| Foundry: | TSMC | TSMC |
| Architecture: | Ada Lovelace | RDNA 2.0 |
| Generation: | GeForce 40 | Navi II (RX 6000) |
| Release Date: | January 8, 2024 | October 28, 2020 |
|
Board Design
|
||
| Bus Interface: | PCIe 4.0 x16 | PCIe 4.0 x16 |
| PCIe Version: | 4.0 | 4.0 |
| PCIe Lanes: | x16 | x16 |
| Process Size: | 5 nm | 7 nm |
| Transistors: | 35.8 billion | 26.8 billion |
| Density: | 121.8 MTr/mm² | 51.5 MTr/mm² |
| Die Size: | 294 mm² | 520 mm² |
| Board Length: | 267 mm | 267 mm |
| Board Width: | 42 mm | 50 mm |
| Board Height: | 112 mm | 120 mm |
| Total Graphics Power (TGP): | 220 W | 300 W |
|
Graphics Processor
|
||
| Compute Units: | 56 | 72 |
| Shading Units: | 7168 | 4608 |
| Texture Mapping Units (TMUs): | 224 | 288 |
| Render Output Units (ROPs): | 80 | 128 |
| Tensor Cores: | 224 | — |
| Ray Tracing Cores: | 56 | 72 |
| Base Clock: | 1980 MHz | 1825 MHz |
| Boost Clock: | 2475 MHz | 2250 MHz |
| L1 Cache: | 128 KB per SM | 128 KB per Array |
| L2 Cache: | 48 MB | 4 MB |
| L3 Cache: | — | 128 MB |
|
Raw Performance
|
||
| Pixel Fill Rate: | 198.0 GPixel/s | 288.0 GPixel/s |
| Texture Fill Rate: | 554.4 GTexel/s | 648.0 GTexel/s |
| FP32 Performance: | 35.48 TFLOPs | 20.74 TFLOPs |
|
Memory
|
||
| Memory Type: | GDDR6X | GDDR6 |
| Memory Size: | 12 GB | 16 GB |
| Memory Bus Width: | 192-bit | 256-bit |
| Memory Clock: | 1313 MHz | 2000 MHz |
| Effective Memory Speed: | 21000 Mbps | 16000 Mbps |
| Bandwidth: | 504.2 GB/s | 512.0 GB/s |
|
APIs
|
||
| DirectX: | 12.2 | 12.2 |
| Vulkan: | 1.4 | 1.4 |
| OpenGL: | 4.6 | 4.6 |
| OpenCL: | 3.0 | 2.1 |
| CUDA: | 8.9 | No |
| Ray Tracing: | Yes | Yes |
| DLSS: | DLSS 3 | No |
| DisplayPort: | 1.4a | 1.4a |
| HDMI: | 2.1 | 2.1 |
|
Gaming FPS
|
||
| 1080p Ultra (FPS): | 153 | 148 |
| 1440p Ultra (FPS): | 121 | 112 |
| 4K Ultra (FPS): | 71 | 65 |
|
Benchmarks
|
||
|
3D Mark
|
||
| Steel Nomad Lite | 21542 | 17598 |
| Time Spy | 20885 | 19364 |
| Solar Bay | 98157 | 78663 |
| Port Royal | 13122 | 9707 |
| Fire Strike | 50115 | 53017 |
| Wild Life Extreme | 41644 | 35605 |
| Night Raid | 165076 | 155402 |
|
GeekBench 6 OpenCL
|
||
| Compute Score | 206598 | 138858 |
| Background Blur | 359.5 | 335.7 |
| Face Detection | 210 | 221.1 |
| Horizon Detection | 7.61 | 6.16 |
| Edge Detection | 10.4 | 8.96 |
| Gaussian Blur | 11.3 | 7.44 |
| Feature Matching | 1.97 | 1.31 |
| Stereo Matching | 969.3 | 263 |
| Particle Physics | 29061.4 | 14755 |
|
Passmark Graphics
|
||
| G3D Mark | 29962 | 25009 |
| G2D Mark | 1193 | 1040 |
| DirectX 11 | 271 | 265 |
| DirectX 12 | 110 | 99 |
| GPU Compute | 16999 | 13150 |
|
GFXBench 5
|
||
| Aztec Ruins High (4K) | 220.10 | 264.20 |
| Aztec Ruins Normal | 1132.40 | 1271.60 |
| Car Chase | 981.80 | 1173.90 |
| Manhattan 3.1.1 (1440p) | 840.60 | 1067.60 |
| T-Rex | 4325.30 | 4050.10 |
| Tessellation | 7090.80 | 3567.00 |
| ALU 2 | 6890.20 | 5306.30 |
| Driver Overhead 2 | 290.10 | 278.90 |
| API | OpenGL | OpenGL |
| OS | Windows | Windows |
|
Blender (Rendering)
|
||
| Blender Score | 6139 | 2420 |
|
GeekBench 6 ML
|
||
| Single Precision | 30706 | 30220 |
| Half Precision | 43851 | 30423 |
| Quantized | 23776 | 22583 |
| Image Classification | 12146 | 11942 |
| Image Segmentation | 23932 | 7603 |
| Image Super Resolution | 36321 | 30511 |
| Face Detection | 52836 | 42862 |
| Pose Estimation | 179788 | 160019 |
| Text Classification | 3371 | 4247 |
| Machine Translation | 5017 | 6279 |
| Object Detection | 15164 | 13910 |
| Depth Estimation | 62500 | 51794 |
| Style Transfer | 357489 | 324124 |
| Framework | ONNX | ONNX |
| Backend | DirectML | DirectML |
|
FurMark
|
||
| 1080p Vulkan | 14071 | 14324 |
| 1440p Vulkan | 9732 | 9707 |
| 2160p Vulkan | 4530 | 5054 |
| 1080p OpenGL | 14401 | 15474 |
| 1440p OpenGL | 10189 | 10583 |
| 2160p OpenGL | 4962 | 5403 |
Tip: ▲ indicates a higher-is-better spec advantage, while ▼ indicates a lower-is-better advantage.
PERFORMANCE CHART COMPARISON OF GeForce RTX 4070 SUPER AND Radeon RX 6800 XT
The charts below visualize how GeForce RTX 4070 SUPER and Radeon RX 6800 XT stack up in key performance metrics.
Radar Chart Comparison
Bullet Chart Comparison
Value For Money Calculator
Prices use available launch or current data. Enter your own prices to see which GPU gives better value.
GeForce RTX 4070 SUPER
Radeon RX 6800 XT
Calculating...
Domain Score Summary
Scores are generated by Comparigon's scoring algorithm and are intended as a high-level guide. They may not map 1-to-1 with the individual spec-by-spec comparisons shown in the table.
Our Verdict
In conclusion, the GeForce RTX 4070 SUPER is clearly better overall compared to the Radeon RX 6800 XT. It comes out ahead across every comparable key area.
Try to Compare Again One of These GPUs With Another GPU
Pick which GPU to keep, then search for the other GPU to compare.
Frequently Asked Questions about GeForce RTX 4070 SUPER vs Radeon RX 6800 XT
GeForce RTX 4070 SUPER scores 7.9% higher than Radeon RX 6800 XT in 3DMark Time Spy (20,885 vs 19,364).
GeForce RTX 4070 SUPER scores 35.2% higher than Radeon RX 6800 XT in 3DMark Port Royal (13,122 vs 9,707).
GeForce RTX 4070 SUPER scores 48.8% higher than Radeon RX 6800 XT in Geekbench 6 OpenCL (206,598 vs 138,858).
Radeon RX 6800 XT has 33.3% more graphics memory than GeForce RTX 4070 SUPER (16 GB vs 12 GB).
Radeon RX 6800 XT has 1.5% higher memory bandwidth than GeForce RTX 4070 SUPER (512.0 GB/s vs 504.2 GB/s).
GeForce RTX 4070 SUPER lists GDDR6X for memory type, while Radeon RX 6800 XT lists GDDR6 for memory type.
GeForce RTX 4070 SUPER lists 220 W for graphics power, while Radeon RX 6800 XT lists 300 W for graphics power.
GeForce RTX 4070 SUPER scores 153.7% higher than Radeon RX 6800 XT in Blender (6,139 vs 2,420).
Both list PCIe 4.0 x16 for bus interface.
GeForce RTX 4070 SUPER was released on January 8, 2024. Radeon RX 6800 XT was released on October 28, 2020. GeForce RTX 4070 SUPER was released 1167 days after Radeon RX 6800 XT.
Disclaimer: Specs, pricing, and benchmarks are sourced from official manufacturer data and verified test results. While we strive for precision, product details and pricing may change. Comparigon may earn an affiliate commission on qualifying purchases.