GeForce RTX 4070 SUPER VS GeForce RTX 5070
We are comparing the GeForce RTX 4070 SUPER ( NVIDIA ) head-to-head with the GeForce RTX 5070 ( NVIDIA ) . You’ll get the key pros and cons of each graphics card, in-depth specs, and gaming benchmarks.
Note: This comparison of GeForce RTX 4070 SUPER vs. GeForce RTX 5070 is based on Comparigon's analysis and is for informational purposes only.
Last Updated: June 17, 2026
Overall Comparison
KEY DIFFERENCES OF GeForce RTX 4070 SUPER AND GeForce RTX 5070
Here’s how GeForce RTX 4070 SUPER and GeForce RTX 5070 stack up against each other in their most impactful areas. Use these bullets to see at a glance which graphics card excels where.
Reasons to consider the GeForce RTX 4070 SUPER
-
4% higher PassMark G3D Mark score (29962 vs 28787)
-
8% higher Geekbench 6 OpenCL score (206598 vs 190967)
-
16% higher PassMark GPU Compute score (16999 vs 14598)
-
15% higher FP32 Compute (35.48 TFLOPS vs 30.87 TFLOPS)
-
1.2× higher Tensor Cores (224 vs 192)
Reasons to consider the GeForce RTX 5070
-
4% higher 4K Ultra FPS (74 vs 71)
-
5% higher 1440p Ultra FPS (127 vs 121)
-
5% higher 1080p Ultra FPS (161 vs 153)
-
9% higher 3DMark Time Spy score (22672 vs 20885)
-
9% higher 3DMark Port Royal score (14348 vs 13122)
SPECIFICATION TABLE COMPARISON OF GeForce RTX 4070 SUPER AND GeForce RTX 5070
Below is the detailed specification table comparing GeForce RTX 4070 SUPER and GeForce RTX 5070.
Note: Highlighted specs mean that GPU wins that spec row.
If neither side is highlighted, it is a tie or there is not enough data for both specs.
| Specification | GeForce RTX 4070 SUPER | GeForce RTX 5070 |
|---|---|---|
|
General Info
|
||
| GPU Name: | GeForce RTX 4070 SUPER | GeForce RTX 5070 |
| GPU Type: | Discrete | Discrete |
| Codename: | AD104 | GB205-300 |
| Vendor: | NVIDIA | NVIDIA |
| Foundry: | TSMC | TSMSC |
| Architecture: | Ada Lovelace | Blackwell 2.0 |
| Generation: | GeForce 40 | GeForce 50 |
| Release Date: | January 8, 2024 | March 4, 2025 |
|
Board Design
|
||
| Bus Interface: | PCIe 4.0 x16 | PCIe 5.0 x16 |
| PCIe Version: | 4.0 | 5.0 |
| PCIe Lanes: | x16 | x16 |
| Process Size: | 5 nm | 5 nm |
| Transistors: | 35.8 billion | 31.1 billion |
| Density: | 121.8 MTr/mm² | 118.25 MTr/mm² |
| Die Size: | 294 mm² | 263 |
| Board Length: | 267 mm | 245 mm |
| Board Width: | 42 mm | 40 mm |
| Board Height: | 112 mm | 115 mm |
| Total Graphics Power (TGP): | 220 W | 250 W |
|
Graphics Processor
|
||
| Compute Units: | 56 | 80 |
| Shading Units: | 7168 | 6144 |
| Texture Mapping Units (TMUs): | 224 | 192 |
| Render Output Units (ROPs): | 80 | 80 |
| Tensor Cores: | 224 | 192 |
| Ray Tracing Cores: | 56 | 48 |
| Base Clock: | 1980 MHz | 2325 |
| Boost Clock: | 2475 MHz | 2512 |
| L1 Cache: | 128 KB per SM | 128KB per cluster |
| L2 Cache: | 48 MB | 48MB shared |
|
Raw Performance
|
||
| Pixel Fill Rate: | 198.0 GPixel/s | 201.0 GPixel/s |
| Texture Fill Rate: | 554.4 GTexel/s | 482.3 GTexel/s |
| FP32 Performance: | 35.48 TFLOPs | 30.87 TFLOPs |
|
Memory
|
||
| Memory Type: | GDDR6X | GDDR7 |
| Memory Size: | 12 GB | 12 GB |
| Memory Bus Width: | 192-bit | 192-bit |
| Memory Clock: | 1313 MHz | 1750 |
| Effective Memory Speed: | 21000 Mbps | 28000 |
| Bandwidth: | 504.2 GB/s | 672 |
|
APIs
|
||
| DirectX: | 12.2 | 12.2 |
| Vulkan: | 1.4 | 1.4 |
| OpenGL: | 4.6 | 4.6 |
| OpenCL: | 3.0 | 3.0 |
| CUDA: | 8.9 | 12.0 |
| Ray Tracing: | Yes | Yes |
| DLSS: | DLSS 3 | DLSS 4 |
| DisplayPort: | 1.4a | 2.1b |
| HDMI: | 2.1 | — |
|
Gaming FPS
|
||
| 1080p Ultra (FPS): | 153 | 161 |
| 1440p Ultra (FPS): | 121 | 127 |
| 4K Ultra (FPS): | 71 | 74 |
|
Benchmarks
|
||
|
3D Mark
|
||
| Steel Nomad Lite | 21542 | 23186 |
| Time Spy | 20885 | 22672 |
| Solar Bay | 98157 | 106341 |
| Port Royal | 13122 | 14348 |
| Fire Strike | 50115 | 58080 |
| Wild Life Extreme | 41644 | 43673 |
| Night Raid | 165076 | 175736 |
|
GeekBench 6 OpenCL
|
||
| Compute Score | 206598 | 190967 |
| Background Blur | 359.5 | 254.4 img/sec |
| Face Detection | 210 | 180.6 img/sec |
| Horizon Detection | 7.61 | 7.91 Gpixels/sec |
| Edge Detection | 10.4 | 10.2 Gpixels/sec |
| Gaussian Blur | 11.3 | 10.7 Gpixels/sec |
| Feature Matching | 1.97 | 1.84 Gpixels/sec |
| Stereo Matching | 969.3 | 975.7 Gpixels/sec |
| Particle Physics | 29061.4 | 27816.5 FPS |
|
Passmark Graphics
|
||
| G3D Mark | 29962 | 28787 |
| G2D Mark | 1193 | 1304 |
| DirectX 11 | 271 | 280 |
| DirectX 12 | 110 | 106 |
| GPU Compute | 16999 | 14598 Ops/s |
|
GFXBench 5
|
||
| Aztec Ruins High (4K) | 220.10 | 1199.40 |
| Aztec Ruins Normal | 1132.40 | 995.80 |
| Car Chase | 981.80 | 859.00 |
| Manhattan 3.1.1 (1440p) | 840.60 | 4075.00 |
| T-Rex | 4325.30 | 6657.70 |
| Tessellation | 7090.80 | 5998.50 |
| ALU 2 | 6890.20 | 276.30 |
| Driver Overhead 2 | 290.10 | — |
| API | OpenGL | — |
| OS | Windows | Windows |
|
Blender (Rendering)
|
||
| Blender Score | 6139 | 6160 |
|
GeekBench 6 ML
|
||
| Single Precision | 30706 | 30221 |
| Half Precision | 43851 | 30221 |
| Quantized | 23776 | 23474 |
| Image Classification | 12146 | 12270 |
| Image Segmentation | 23932 | 30237 |
| Image Super Resolution | 36321 | 35585 |
| Face Detection | 52836 | 62662 |
| Pose Estimation | 179788 | 145190 |
| Text Classification | 3371 | 4198 |
| Machine Translation | 5017 | 6233 |
| Object Detection | 15164 | 16709 |
| Depth Estimation | 62500 | 58300 |
| Style Transfer | 357489 | 246598 |
| Framework | ONNX | ONNX |
| Backend | DirectML | DirectML |
|
FurMark
|
||
| 1080p Vulkan | 14071 | 17361 |
| 1440p Vulkan | 9732 | 12595 |
| 2160p Vulkan | 4530 | 7899 |
| 1080p OpenGL | 14401 | 16477 |
| 1440p OpenGL | 10189 | 12295 |
| 2160p OpenGL | 4962 | 6339 |
Tip: ▲ indicates a higher-is-better spec advantage, while ▼ indicates a lower-is-better advantage.
PERFORMANCE CHART COMPARISON OF GeForce RTX 4070 SUPER AND GeForce RTX 5070
The charts below visualize how GeForce RTX 4070 SUPER and GeForce RTX 5070 stack up in key performance metrics.
Radar Chart Comparison
Bullet Chart Comparison
Release Timeline of GeForce RTX 4070 SUPER and GeForce RTX 5070
GeForce RTX 4070 SUPER was released 1 year, 1 month, 24 days earlier than GeForce RTX 5070.
Value For Money Calculator
Prices use available launch or current data. Enter your own prices to see which GPU gives better value.
GeForce RTX 4070 SUPER
GeForce RTX 5070
Calculating...
Domain Score Summary
Note: Scores (0 to 100) are generated by Comparigon’s scoring algorithm and are intended as a high-level guide. They may not map 1-to-1 with the individual spec-by-spec comparisons shown in the table.
Our Verdict
In conclusion, the GeForce RTX 4070 SUPER is clearly better overall compared to the GeForce RTX 5070. Its strongest advantages are in AI & Machine Learning, Workstation and Energy Efficiency. The GeForce RTX 5070 is the better fit if your top priority is Gaming Performance and Hardware Architecture.
Try to Compare Again One of These GPUs With Another GPU
Pick which GPU to keep, then search for the other GPU to compare.