GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop VS GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop
We are comparing the GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop ( NVIDIA ) head-to-head with the GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop ( NVIDIA ) . You’ll get the key pros and cons of each graphics card, in-depth specs, and gaming benchmarks.
Note: This comparison of GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop vs. GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop is based on Comparigon's analysis and is for informational purposes only.
Last Updated: August 20, 2026
Overall Comparison
KEY DIFFERENCES OF GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop AND GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop
Here’s how GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop and GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop stack up against each other in their most impactful areas. Use these bullets to see at a glance which graphics card excels where.
Why GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop is the best choice:
-
47% higher 4K Ultra FPS (66 vs 45)
-
35% higher 1440p Ultra FPS (111 vs 82)
-
30% higher 1080p Ultra FPS (143 vs 110)
-
34% higher Boost Clock (2280 MHz vs 1702.5 MHz)
-
50% higher 3DMark Time Spy score (18839 vs 12518)
SPECIFICATION TABLE COMPARISON OF GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop AND GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop
Below is the detailed specification table comparing GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop and GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop.
Note: Highlighted specs mean that GPU wins that spec row.
If neither side is highlighted, it is a tie or there is not enough data for both specs.
| Specification | GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop | GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop |
|---|---|---|
|
General Info
|
||
| GPU Name: | GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop | GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop |
| GPU Type: | Laptop GPU | Laptop GPU |
| Codename: | AD106 (GN21-X6) | AD104 (GN21-X9) |
| Vendor: | NVIDIA | NVIDIA |
| Foundry: | TSMC | TSMC |
| Architecture: | Ada Lovelace | Ada Lovelace |
| Generation: | GeForce 40 Mobile | GeForce 40 Mobile |
| Release Date: | January 3, 2023 | January 3, 2023 |
|
Board Design
|
||
| Bus Interface: | PCIe 4.0 x16 | PCIe 4.0 x16 |
| PCIe Version: | 4.0 | 4.0 |
| PCIe Lanes: | 16 | 16 |
| Process Size: | 5 nm | 5 nm |
| Transistors: | 22.9 billion | 35.8 billion |
| Density: | 121.8 MTr/mm² | 121.8 MTr/mm² |
| Die Size: | 188 mm² | 294 mm² |
| Total Graphics Power (TGP): | 35-140 W | 60-175 W |
|
Graphics Processor
|
||
| Compute Units: | 36 | 58 |
| Shading Units: | 4608 | 7424 |
| Texture Mapping Units (TMUs): | 144 | 232 |
| Render Output Units (ROPs): | 48 | 80 |
| Tensor Cores: | 144 | 232 |
| Ray Tracing Cores: | 36 | 58 |
| Base Clock: | 735-2070 MHz | 1860 MHz |
| Boost Clock: | 1230-2175 MHz | 2280 MHz |
| L1 Cache: | 128 KB per cluster | 128 KB per cluster |
| L2 Cache: | 32 MB | 48 MB |
|
Raw Performance
|
||
| Pixel Fill Rate: | 81.36 GPixel/s | 133.2 GPixel/s |
| Texture Fill Rate: | 244.1 GTexel/s | 386.3 GTexel/s |
| FP32 Performance: | 15.62 TFLOPs | 24.72 TFLOPs |
|
Memory
|
||
| Memory Type: | GDDR6 | GDDR6 |
| Memory Size: | 8 GB | 12 GB |
| Memory Bus Width: | 128-bit | 192-bit |
| Memory Clock: | 2000 MHz | 2250 MHz |
| Effective Memory Speed: | 16000 Mbps | 18000 Mbps |
| Bandwidth: | 256 GB/s | 432 GB/s |
|
APIs
|
||
| DirectX: | 12 Ultimate (12_2) | 12 Ultimate (12_2) |
| Vulkan: | 1.4 | 1.4 |
| OpenGL: | 4.6 | 4.6 |
| OpenCL: | 3.0 | 3.0 |
| CUDA: | 8.9 | 8.9 |
| Ray Tracing: | 1 | 1 |
| DLSS: | DLSS 3 | DLSS 3 |
| DisplayPort: | 1.4a | 1.4a |
|
Gaming FPS
|
||
| 1080p Ultra (FPS): | 110 | 143 |
| 1440p Ultra (FPS): | 82 | 111 |
| 4K Ultra (FPS): | 45 | 66 |
|
Benchmarks
|
||
|
3D Mark
|
||
| Steel Nomad Lite | 12718 | 19250 |
| Time Spy | 12518 | 18839 |
| Solar Bay | 54567 | 85068 |
| Port Royal | 7397 | 11833 |
| Fire Strike | 30041 | 41183 |
| Wild Life Extreme | 23178 | 37056 |
| Night Raid | 113772 | 147263 |
|
GeekBench 6 OpenCL
|
||
| Compute Score | 115081 | 170767 |
| Background Blur | 158.5 img/sec | 328.9 img/sec |
| Face Detection | 116.5 img/sec | 192.3 img/sec |
| Horizon Detection | 4.35 Gpixels/sec | 6.51 Gpixels/sec |
| Edge Detection | 5.67 Gpixels/sec | 9.11 Gpixels/sec |
| Gaussian Blur | 6.44 Gpixels/sec | 10.1 Gpixels/sec |
| Feature Matching | 1.36 Gpixels/sec | 1.56 Gpixels/sec |
| Stereo Matching | 528.5 Gpixels/sec | 660.7 Gpixels/sec |
| Particle Physics | 16372.3 | 20765.5 |
|
Passmark Graphics
|
||
| G3D Mark | 19527 | 24711 |
| G2D Mark | 767 | 922 |
| DirectX 11 | 178 | 241 |
| DirectX 12 | 85 | 96 |
| GPU Compute | 8389 | 11008 |
|
Blender (Rendering)
|
||
| Blender Score | 3620 | 5665 |
|
GeekBench 6 ML
|
||
| Single Precision | 21186 | 26637 |
| Half Precision | 34404 | 39211 |
| Quantized | 16559 | 19995 |
| Image Classification | 8642 | 10385 |
| Image Segmentation | 20635 | 25896 |
| Image Super Resolution | 26378 | 27816 |
| Face Detection | 39776 | 51976 |
| Pose Estimation | 105983 | 142459 |
| Text Classification | 2995 | 3405 |
| Machine Translation | 4507 | 4860 |
| Object Detection | 10198 | 13308 |
| Depth Estimation | 41078 | 49203 |
| Style Transfer | 190315 | 262792 |
| Framework | ONNX | ONNX |
| Backend | DirectML | DirectML |
|
FurMark
|
||
| 1080p Vulkan | 8952 | 14052 |
| 1440p Vulkan | 6807 | 10512 |
| 2160p Vulkan | 2692 | 4798 |
| 1080p OpenGL | 8874 | 13206 |
| 1440p OpenGL | 6706 | 9737 |
| 2160p OpenGL | — | 5208 |
Tip: ▲ indicates a higher-is-better spec advantage, while ▼ indicates a lower-is-better advantage.
PERFORMANCE CHART COMPARISON OF GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop AND GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop
The charts below visualize how GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop and GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop stack up in key performance metrics.
Radar Chart Comparison
Bullet Chart Comparison
Release Timeline of GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop and GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop
GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop and GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop were released on the same day.
Value For Money Calculator
Prices use available launch or current data. Enter your own prices to see which GPU gives better value.
GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop
GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop
Calculating...
Domain Score Summary
Note: Scores (0 to 100) are generated by Comparigon’s scoring algorithm and are intended as a high-level guide. They may not map 1-to-1 with the individual spec-by-spec comparisons shown in the table.
Our Verdict
In conclusion, the GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop is slightly better overall compared to the GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop. Its strongest advantages are in Gaming Performance, AI & Machine Learning, Hardware Architecture and Workstation. They are still fairly close in Energy Efficiency.
Try to Compare Again One of These GPUs With Another GPU
Pick which GPU to keep, then search for the other GPU to compare.