GeForce RTX 4060 VS Radeon RX 6700 XT
We are comparing the GeForce RTX 4060 (NVIDIA) with the Radeon RX 6700 XT (AMD). Scroll down to the pros and cons of each graphics card, in-depth specs, and gaming benchmarks.
Last Updated: November 2, 2026
Overall Comparison
KEY DIFFERENCES OF GeForce RTX 4060 AND Radeon RX 6700 XT
Here’s how GeForce RTX 4060 and Radeon RX 6700 XT stack up against each other in their most impactful areas.
Reasons to consider the GeForce RTX 4060
-
106% higher Blender score (3126 vs 1518)
-
14% higher FP32 Compute (15.1 TFLOPS vs 13.21 TFLOPS)
-
29% smaller process node (5 nm vs 7 nm)
Reasons to consider the Radeon RX 6700 XT
-
13% higher 4K Ultra FPS (43 vs 38)
-
10% higher 1440p Ultra FPS (76 vs 69)
-
11% higher 1080p Ultra FPS (105 vs 95)
-
5% higher Boost Clock (2581 MHz vs 2460 MHz)
-
21% higher 3DMark Time Spy score (12813 vs 10621)
SPECIFICATION TABLE COMPARISON OF GeForce RTX 4060 AND Radeon RX 6700 XT
Below is the detailed specification table comparing GeForce RTX 4060 and Radeon RX 6700 XT.
Note: Highlighted specs mean that GPU wins that spec row.
If neither side is highlighted, it is a tie or there is not enough data for both specs.
| Specification | GeForce RTX 4060 | Radeon RX 6700 XT |
|---|---|---|
|
General Info
|
||
| GPU Name: | GeForce RTX 4060 | Radeon RX 6700 XT |
| GPU Type: | Discrete | Discrete |
| Codename: | AD107 | Navi 22 |
| Vendor: | NVIDIA | AMD |
| Foundry: | TSMC | TSMC |
| Architecture: | Ada Lovelace | RDNA 2.0 |
| Generation: | GeForce 40 | Navi II (RX 6000) |
| Release Date: | May 18, 2023 | March 3, 2021 |
|
Board Design
|
||
| Bus Interface: | PCIe 4.0 x8 | PCIe 4.0 x16 |
| PCIe Version: | 4.0 | 4.0 |
| PCIe Lanes: | 8 | 16 |
| Process Size: | 5 nm | 7 nm |
| Transistors: | 18 billion | 17 billion |
| Density: | 113.21 MTr/mm² | 50.75 MTr/mm² |
| Die Size: | 159 mm² | 335 mm² |
| Board Length: | — | 267 mm |
| Board Width: | — | 40 mm |
| Board Height: | — | 110 mm |
| Total Graphics Power (TGP): | 115 W | 230 W |
|
Graphics Processor
|
||
| Compute Units: | 24 | 40 |
| Shading Units: | 3072 | 2560 |
| Texture Mapping Units (TMUs): | 96 | 160 |
| Render Output Units (ROPs): | 48 | 64 |
| Tensor Cores: | 96 | — |
| Ray Tracing Cores: | 24 | 40 |
| Base Clock: | 1830 MHz | 2321 MHz |
| Boost Clock: | 2460 MHz | 2581 MHz |
| L1 Cache: | 128 KB (per SM) | 128 KB per Array |
| L2 Cache: | 24 MB | 3 MB |
| L3 Cache: | — | 96 MB |
|
Raw Performance
|
||
| Pixel Fill Rate: | 118 GPixel/s | 165.2 GPixel/s |
| Texture Fill Rate: | 236 GTexel/s | 413.0 GTexel/s |
| FP32 Performance: | 15.1 TFLOPs | 13.21 TFLOPs |
|
Memory
|
||
| Memory Type: | GDDR6 | GDDR6 |
| Memory Size: | 8 GB | 12 GB |
| Memory Bus Width: | 128-bit | 192-bit |
| Memory Clock: | 2125 MHz | 2000 MHz |
| Effective Memory Speed: | 17000 Mbps | 16000 Mbps |
| Bandwidth: | 272 GB/s | 384 GB/s |
|
APIs
|
||
| DirectX: | 12 | 12 |
| Vulkan: | 1.3 | 1.3 |
| OpenGL: | 4.6 | 4.6 |
| OpenCL: | 3.0 | 2.1 |
| CUDA: | 8.9 | — |
| Ray Tracing: | 1 | 1 |
| DLSS: | DLSS 3 | 0 |
| DisplayPort: | 1.4a | 1.4a |
| HDMI: | 2.1 | 2.1 |
|
Gaming FPS
|
||
| 1080p Ultra (FPS): | 95 | 105 |
| 1440p Ultra (FPS): | 69 | 76 |
| 4K Ultra (FPS): | 38 | 43 |
|
Benchmarks
|
||
|
3D Mark
|
||
| Steel Nomad Lite | 10686 | 11432 |
| Time Spy | 10621 | 12813 |
| Solar Bay | 49249 | 50228 |
| Port Royal | 6055 | 6190 |
| Fire Strike | 28554 | 35839 |
| Wild Life Extreme | 20612 | 22915 |
| Night Raid | 121524 | 130531 |
|
GeekBench 6 OpenCL
|
||
| Compute Score | 106633 | 110742 |
| Background Blur | 186.9 img/sec | 245.8 img/sec |
| Face Detection | 112.7 img/sec | 153.3 img/sec |
| Horizon Detection | 3.92 Gpixels/sec | 3.99 Gpixels/sec |
| Edge Detection | 5.16 Gpixels/sec | 5.82 Gpixels/sec |
| Gaussian Blur | 4.94 Gpixels/sec | 4.37 Gpixels/sec |
| Feature Matching | 1.34 Gpixels/sec | 1.01 Gpixels/sec |
| Stereo Matching | 446.2 Gpixels/sec | 474.4 Gpixels/sec |
| Particle Physics | 14935.1 | 13872.6 |
|
Passmark Graphics
|
||
| G3D Mark | 19523 | 19742 |
| G2D Mark | 1039 | 953 |
| DirectX 11 | 174 | 173 |
| DirectX 12 | 76 | 77 |
| GPU Compute | 9185 | 9278 |
|
GFXBench 5
|
||
| Aztec Ruins High (4K) | 118.30 | 173.60 |
| Aztec Ruins Normal | 709.00 | 943.90 |
| Car Chase | 615.40 | 840.00 |
| Manhattan 3.1.1 (1440p) | 496.10 | 743.30 |
| T-Rex | 2635.80 | 2906.30 |
| Tessellation | 3372.60 | 2414.40 |
| ALU 2 | 3284.00 | 3886.30 |
| Driver Overhead 2 | 280.80 | 290.80 |
| API | OpenGL | OpenGL |
| OS | Windows | Windows |
|
Blender (Rendering)
|
||
| Blender Score | 3126 | 1518 |
|
GeekBench 6 ML
|
||
| Single Precision | 17857 | 21026 |
| Half Precision | 29214 | 21983 |
| Quantized | 14234 | 16106 |
| Image Classification | 7696 | 9076 |
| Image Segmentation | 13706 | 10972 |
| Image Super Resolution | 23289 | 24228 |
| Face Detection | 31126 | 32365 |
| Pose Estimation | 78361 | 100249 |
| Text Classification | 3315 | 2204 |
| Machine Translation | 3491 | 4803 |
| Object Detection | 9386 | 9882 |
| Depth Estimation | 36778 | 37762 |
| Style Transfer | 148120 | 210688 |
| Framework | ONNX | ONNX |
| Backend | DirectML | DirectML |
|
FurMark
|
||
| 1080p Vulkan | 7053 | 9153 |
| 1440p Vulkan | 4629 | 6300 |
| 2160p Vulkan | 2014 | 3237 |
| 1080p OpenGL | 7212 | 10146 |
| 1440p OpenGL | 4995 | 6900 |
| 2160p OpenGL | 2165 | 3596 |
Tip: ▲ indicates a higher-is-better spec advantage, while ▼ indicates a lower-is-better advantage.
PERFORMANCE CHART COMPARISON OF GeForce RTX 4060 AND Radeon RX 6700 XT
The charts below visualize how GeForce RTX 4060 and Radeon RX 6700 XT stack up in key performance metrics.
Radar Chart Comparison
Bullet Chart Comparison
Value For Money Calculator
Prices use available launch or current data. Enter your own prices to see which GPU gives better value.
GeForce RTX 4060
Radeon RX 6700 XT
Calculating...
Domain Score Summary
Scores are generated by Comparigon's scoring algorithm and are intended as a high-level guide. They may not map 1-to-1 with the individual spec-by-spec comparisons shown in the table.
Our Verdict
In conclusion, the GeForce RTX 4060 is clearly better overall compared to the Radeon RX 6700 XT. Its strongest advantages are in Hardware Architecture, Workstation and Energy Efficiency. The Radeon RX 6700 XT is the better fit if your top priority is Gaming Performance and AI & Machine Learning.
Try to Compare Again One of These GPUs With Another GPU
Pick which GPU to keep, then search for the other GPU to compare.
Frequently Asked Questions about GeForce RTX 4060 vs Radeon RX 6700 XT
Radeon RX 6700 XT scores 20.6% higher than GeForce RTX 4060 in 3DMark Time Spy (12,813 vs 10,621).
Radeon RX 6700 XT scores 2.2% higher than GeForce RTX 4060 in 3DMark Port Royal (6,190 vs 6,055).
Radeon RX 6700 XT scores 3.9% higher than GeForce RTX 4060 in Geekbench 6 OpenCL (110,742 vs 106,633).
Radeon RX 6700 XT has 50% more graphics memory than GeForce RTX 4060 (12 GB vs 8 GB).
Radeon RX 6700 XT has 41.2% higher memory bandwidth than GeForce RTX 4060 (384 GB/s vs 272 GB/s).
Both list GDDR6 for memory type.
GeForce RTX 4060 lists 115 W for graphics power, while Radeon RX 6700 XT lists 230 W for graphics power.
GeForce RTX 4060 scores 105.9% higher than Radeon RX 6700 XT in Blender (3,126 vs 1,518).
GeForce RTX 4060 lists PCIe 4.0 x8 for bus interface, while Radeon RX 6700 XT lists PCIe 4.0 x16 for bus interface.
GeForce RTX 4060 was released on May 18, 2023. Radeon RX 6700 XT was released on March 3, 2021. GeForce RTX 4060 was released 806 days after Radeon RX 6700 XT.
Disclaimer: Specs, pricing, and benchmarks are sourced from official manufacturer data and verified test results. While we strive for precision, product details and pricing may change. Comparigon may earn an affiliate commission on qualifying purchases.