GeForce RTX 4060 Ti (16GB) VS Radeon RX 7700 XT

We are comparing the GeForce RTX 4060 Ti (16GB) (NVIDIA) with the Radeon RX 7700 XT (AMD). Scroll down to the pros and cons of each graphics card, in-depth specs, and gaming benchmarks.

Last Updated: September 15, 2026

GeForce RTX 4060 Ti (16GB)

NVIDIA

View on Amazon
VS

Radeon RX 7700 XT

AMD

View on Amazon

KEY DIFFERENCES OF GeForce RTX 4060 Ti (16GB) AND Radeon RX 7700 XT

Here’s how GeForce RTX 4060 Ti (16GB) and Radeon RX 7700 XT stack up against each other in their most impactful areas.

GeForce RTX 4060 Ti (16GB): 2 advantages Radeon RX 7700 XT: 5 advantages

Reasons to consider the GeForce RTX 4060 Ti (16GB)

2
  • 83% higher Blender score (3845 vs 2101)
  • 33% more VRAM (16GB vs 12GB)

Reasons to consider the Radeon RX 7700 XT

5
  • 16% higher 4K Ultra FPS (57 vs 49)
  • 15% higher 1440p Ultra FPS (98 vs 85)
  • 14% higher 1080p Ultra FPS (132 vs 116)
  • 27% higher 3DMark Time Spy score (17097 vs 13463)
  • 12% higher 3DMark Port Royal score (9109 vs 8119)

SPECIFICATION TABLE COMPARISON OF GeForce RTX 4060 Ti (16GB) AND Radeon RX 7700 XT

Below is the detailed specification table comparing GeForce RTX 4060 Ti (16GB) and Radeon RX 7700 XT.

Note: Highlighted specs mean that GPU wins that spec row.

If neither side is highlighted, it is a tie or there is not enough data for both specs.

Specification GeForce RTX 4060 Ti (16GB) Radeon RX 7700 XT
General Info
GPU Name: GeForce RTX 4060 Ti (16GB) Radeon RX 7700 XT
GPU Type: Discrete Discrete
Codename: AD106 Navi 32
Vendor: NVIDIA AMD
Foundry: TSMC TSMC
Architecture: Ada Lovelace RDNA 3.0
Generation: GeForce 40 Navi III (RX 7000)
Release Date: July 18, 2023 August 25, 2023
Board Design
Bus Interface: PCIe 4.0 x8 PCIe 4.0 x16
PCIe Version: 4.0 4.0
PCIe Lanes: x8 x16
Process Size: 5 nm 5 nm
Transistors: 22.9 billion 28.1 billion
Density: 121.8 MTr/mm² 81.2 MTr/mm²
Die Size: 188 mm² 346 mm²
Board Length: 240 mm 267 mm
Board Width: 40 mm 50 mm
Board Height: 111 mm 135 mm
Total Graphics Power (TGP): 165 W 245 W
Graphics Processor
Compute Units: 34 54
Shading Units: 4352 3456
Texture Mapping Units (TMUs): 136 216
Render Output Units (ROPs): 48 96
Tensor Cores: 136 108
Ray Tracing Cores: 34 54
Base Clock: 2310 MHz 1435 MHz
Boost Clock: 2535 MHz 2544 MHz
L1 Cache: 128 KB per SM 128 KB per Array
L2 Cache: 32 MB 2 MB
L3 Cache: 48 MB
Raw Performance
Pixel Fill Rate: 121.7 GPixel/s 244.2 GPixel/s
Texture Fill Rate: 344.8 GTexel/s 549.5 GTexel/s
FP32 Performance: 22.06 TFLOPs 35.17 TFLOPs
Memory
Memory Type: GDDR6 GDDR6
Memory Size: 16 GB 12 GB
Memory Bus Width: 128-bit 192-bit
Memory Clock: 2250 MHz 2250 MHz
Effective Memory Speed: 18000 Mbps 18000 Mbps
Bandwidth: 288.0 GB/s 432.0 GB/s
APIs
DirectX: 12.2 12.2
Vulkan: 1.3 1.4
OpenGL: 4.6 4.6
OpenCL: 3.0 2.2
CUDA: 8.9
Ray Tracing: Yes Yes
DLSS: DLSS 3
FSR: FSR
DisplayPort: 1.4a 2.1
HDMI: 2.1 2.1a
Gaming FPS
1080p Ultra (FPS): 116 132
1440p Ultra (FPS): 85 98
4K Ultra (FPS): 49 57
Benchmarks
3D Mark
Steel Nomad Lite 13560 14951
Time Spy 13463 17097
Solar Bay 62357 64396
Port Royal 8119 9109
Fire Strike 34262 42698
Wild Life Extreme 25613 29981
Night Raid 136242 146678
GeekBench 6 OpenCL
Compute Score 135837 132843
Background Blur 232.6 285.8
Face Detection 138.4 181.6
Horizon Detection 4.68 4.9
Edge Detection 6.06 6.66
Gaussian Blur 6.99 5.68
Feature Matching 1.6 1.18
Stereo Matching 652.6 493
Particle Physics 19534.7 19410.5
Passmark Graphics
G3D Mark 22690 22633
G2D Mark 1081 1162
DirectX 11 200 232
DirectX 12 90 81
GPU Compute 12042 12960
GFXBench 5
Aztec Ruins High (4K) 119.70 174.90
Aztec Ruins Normal 725.20 1178.60
Car Chase 620.40 1007.50
Manhattan 3.1.1 (1440p) 494.40 806.10
T-Rex 2727.20 3466.60
Tessellation 3381.90 4717.00
ALU 2 3343.90 5953.90
Driver Overhead 2 272.90 280.30
API OpenGL OpenGL
OS Windows Windows
Blender (Rendering)
Blender Score 3845 2101
GeekBench 6 ML
Single Precision 25719
Half Precision 30075
Quantized 19789
Image Classification 11284
Image Segmentation 14150
Image Super Resolution 27972
Face Detection 35311
Pose Estimation 142235
Text Classification 3836
Machine Translation 4471
Object Detection 12084
Depth Estimation 49197
Style Transfer 301429
Framework ONNX
Backend DirectML
FurMark
1080p Vulkan 10569 11349
1440p Vulkan 7268 8332
2160p Vulkan 2451 4160
1080p OpenGL 10099 11363
1440p OpenGL 7275 8623
2160p OpenGL 2784 4547

Tip: indicates a higher-is-better spec advantage, while indicates a lower-is-better advantage.

PERFORMANCE CHART COMPARISON OF GeForce RTX 4060 Ti (16GB) AND Radeon RX 7700 XT

The charts below visualize how GeForce RTX 4060 Ti (16GB) and Radeon RX 7700 XT stack up in key performance metrics.

Radar Chart Comparison

Category scores overview (0 to 100)
GeForce RTX 4060 Ti (16GB)
Radeon RX 7700 XT

Bullet Chart Comparison

Market Top is the best score found. Colored bars are % of market top (0 to 100).
Market Top
GeForce RTX 4060 Ti (16GB)
Radeon RX 7700 XT

Release Timeline of GeForce RTX 4060 Ti (16GB) and Radeon RX 7700 XT

GeForce RTX 4060 Ti (16GB)
38 days
Radeon RX 7700 XT

GeForce RTX 4060 Ti (16GB) was released 1 month, 7 days earlier than Radeon RX 7700 XT.

Value For Money Calculator

Prices use available launch or current data. Enter your own prices to see which GPU gives better value.

GeForce RTX 4060 Ti (16GB)

16 GB GDDR6
$
Value Index
0.0

Radeon RX 7700 XT

12 GB GDDR6
$
Value Index
0.0
GeForce RTX 4060 Ti (16GB)
Radeon RX 7700 XT
0%

Calculating...

Domain Score Summary

Scores are generated by Comparigon's scoring algorithm and are intended as a high-level guide. They may not map 1-to-1 with the individual spec-by-spec comparisons shown in the table.

GeForce RTX 4060 Ti (16GB) Radeon RX 7700 XT
ALL
Overall
Difference: 3
Leads
GeForce RTX 4060 Ti (16GB)
72
Radeon RX 7700 XT
75
Gaming Performance
Difference: 5
Leads
GeForce RTX 4060 Ti (16GB)
57
Radeon RX 7700 XT
62
AI & Machine Learning
Difference: 0
Tie
GeForce RTX 4060 Ti (16GB)
68
Radeon RX 7700 XT
68
Hardware Architecture
Difference: 2
Leads
GeForce RTX 4060 Ti (16GB)
77
Radeon RX 7700 XT
79
Workstation
Difference: 0
Tie
GeForce RTX 4060 Ti (16GB)
63
Radeon RX 7700 XT
63
Energy Efficiency
Difference: 11
Leads
GeForce RTX 4060 Ti (16GB)
61
Radeon RX 7700 XT
72

Our Verdict

In conclusion, the Radeon RX 7700 XT edges out overall compared to the GeForce RTX 4060 Ti (16GB). Its strongest advantages are in Gaming Performance, Hardware Architecture and Energy Efficiency. They are still fairly close in AI & Machine Learning and Workstation.

Try to Compare Again One of These GPUs With Another GPU

Pick which GPU to keep, then search for the other GPU to compare.

Select either gpu below to choose which one stays in the comparison.

Disclaimer: Specs, pricing, and benchmarks are sourced from official manufacturer data and verified test results. While we strive for precision, product details and pricing may change. Comparigon may earn an affiliate commission on qualifying purchases.