GeForce RTX 4060 Ti (16GB) VS GeForce RTX 5070 Ti
We are comparing the GeForce RTX 4060 Ti (16GB) (NVIDIA) with the GeForce RTX 5070 Ti (NVIDIA). Scroll down to the pros and cons of each graphics card, in-depth specs, and gaming benchmarks.
Last Updated: September 22, 2026
Overall Comparison
KEY DIFFERENCES OF GeForce RTX 4060 Ti (16GB) AND GeForce RTX 5070 Ti
Here’s how GeForce RTX 4060 Ti (16GB) and GeForce RTX 5070 Ti stack up against each other in their most impactful areas.
Reasons to consider the GeForce RTX 4060 Ti (16GB)
-
3% higher Boost Clock (2535 MHz vs 2452 MHz)
Reasons to consider the GeForce RTX 5070 Ti
-
78% higher 4K Ultra FPS (87 vs 49)
-
74% higher 1440p Ultra FPS (148 vs 85)
-
59% higher 1080p Ultra FPS (185 vs 116)
-
106% higher 3DMark Time Spy score (27800 vs 13463)
-
140% higher 3DMark Port Royal score (19478 vs 8119)
SPECIFICATION TABLE COMPARISON OF GeForce RTX 4060 Ti (16GB) AND GeForce RTX 5070 Ti
Below is the detailed specification table comparing GeForce RTX 4060 Ti (16GB) and GeForce RTX 5070 Ti.
Note: Highlighted specs mean that GPU wins that spec row.
If neither side is highlighted, it is a tie or there is not enough data for both specs.
| Specification | GeForce RTX 4060 Ti (16GB) | GeForce RTX 5070 Ti |
|---|---|---|
|
General Info
|
||
| GPU Name: | GeForce RTX 4060 Ti (16GB) | GeForce RTX 5070 Ti |
| GPU Type: | Discrete | Discrete |
| Codename: | AD106 | GB203-200-A1 |
| Vendor: | NVIDIA | NVIDIA |
| Foundry: | TSMC | TSMC |
| Architecture: | Ada Lovelace | Blackwell 2.0 |
| Generation: | GeForce 40 | GeForce 50 |
| Release Date: | July 18, 2023 | February 20, 2025 |
|
Board Design
|
||
| Bus Interface: | PCIe 4.0 x8 | PCIe 5.0 x16 |
| PCIe Version: | 4.0 | 5.0 |
| PCIe Lanes: | x8 | x16 |
| Process Size: | 5 nm | 5 nm |
| Transistors: | 22.9 billion | 45.6 billion |
| Density: | 121.8 MTr/mm² | 120.63 MTr/mm² |
| Die Size: | 188 mm² | 378 |
| Board Length: | 240 mm | 304 mm |
| Board Width: | 40 mm | 48 mm |
| Board Height: | 111 mm | 137 mm |
| Total Graphics Power (TGP): | 165 W | 300 W |
|
Graphics Processor
|
||
| Compute Units: | 34 | 70 |
| Shading Units: | 4352 | 8960 |
| Texture Mapping Units (TMUs): | 136 | 280 |
| Render Output Units (ROPs): | 48 | 96 |
| Tensor Cores: | 136 | 280 |
| Ray Tracing Cores: | 34 | 70 |
| Base Clock: | 2310 MHz | 2295 |
| Boost Clock: | 2535 MHz | 2452 |
| L1 Cache: | 128 KB per SM | 128KB per cluster |
| L2 Cache: | 32 MB | 48MB shared |
|
Raw Performance
|
||
| Pixel Fill Rate: | 121.7 GPixel/s | 235.4 GPixel/s |
| Texture Fill Rate: | 344.8 GTexel/s | 686.6 GTexel/s |
| FP32 Performance: | 22.06 TFLOPs | 43.94 TFLOPs |
|
Memory
|
||
| Memory Type: | GDDR6 | GDDR7 |
| Memory Size: | 16 GB | 16 GB |
| Memory Bus Width: | 128-bit | 256-bit |
| Memory Clock: | 2250 MHz | 1750 |
| Effective Memory Speed: | 18000 Mbps | 28000 |
| Bandwidth: | 288.0 GB/s | 896 |
|
APIs
|
||
| DirectX: | 12.2 | 12.2 |
| Vulkan: | 1.3 | 1.4 |
| OpenGL: | 4.6 | 4.6 |
| OpenCL: | 3.0 | 3.0 |
| CUDA: | 8.9 | 12.0 |
| Ray Tracing: | Yes | Yes |
| DLSS: | DLSS 3 | DLSS 4 |
| DisplayPort: | 1.4a | 2.1b |
| HDMI: | 2.1 | — |
|
Gaming FPS
|
||
| 1080p Ultra (FPS): | 116 | 185 |
| 1440p Ultra (FPS): | 85 | 148 |
| 4K Ultra (FPS): | 49 | 87 |
|
Benchmarks
|
||
|
3D Mark
|
||
| Steel Nomad Lite | 13560 | 29948 |
| Time Spy | 13463 | 27800 |
| Solar Bay | 62357 | 136509 |
| Port Royal | 8119 | 19478 |
| Fire Strike | 34262 | 67265 |
| Wild Life Extreme | 25613 | 57591 |
| Night Raid | 136242 | 190530 |
|
GeekBench 6 OpenCL
|
||
| Compute Score | 135837 | 240508 |
| Background Blur | 232.6 | 297.9 img/sec |
| Face Detection | 138.4 | 218.6 img/sec |
| Horizon Detection | 4.68 | 10.1 Gpixels/sec |
| Edge Detection | 6.06 | 13.9 Gpixels/sec |
| Gaussian Blur | 6.99 | 14.8 Gpixels/sec |
| Feature Matching | 1.6 | 2.03 Gpixels/sec |
| Stereo Matching | 652.6 | 1290 Gpixels/sec |
| Particle Physics | 19534.7 | 35438.3 FPS |
|
Passmark Graphics
|
||
| G3D Mark | 22690 | 32464 |
| G2D Mark | 1081 | 1333 |
| DirectX 11 | 200 | 303 |
| DirectX 12 | 90 | 126 |
| GPU Compute | 12042 | 18318 Ops/s |
|
GFXBench 5
|
||
| Aztec Ruins High (4K) | 119.70 | 343.80 |
| Aztec Ruins Normal | 725.20 | 1450.00 |
| Car Chase | 620.40 | 1281.40 |
| Manhattan 3.1.1 (1440p) | 494.40 | 983.70 |
| T-Rex | 2727.20 | 4055.80 |
| Tessellation | 3381.90 | 10135.40 |
| ALU 2 | 3343.90 | 9247.00 |
| Driver Overhead 2 | 272.90 | 251.70 |
| API | OpenGL | OpenGL |
| OS | Windows | Windows |
|
Blender (Rendering)
|
||
| Blender Score | 3845 | 7571 |
|
GeekBench 6 ML
|
||
| Single Precision | — | 36504 |
| Half Precision | — | 64459 |
| Quantized | — | 27312 |
| Image Classification | — | 14913 |
| Image Segmentation | — | 45199 |
| Image Super Resolution | — | 39360 |
| Face Detection | — | 84188 |
| Pose Estimation | — | 161400 |
| Text Classification | — | 4010 |
| Machine Translation | — | 7973 |
| Object Detection | — | 18934 |
| Depth Estimation | — | 67761 |
| Style Transfer | — | 335879 |
| Framework | — | 335879 |
| Backend | — | DirectML |
|
FurMark
|
||
| 1080p Vulkan | 10569 | 18040 |
| 1440p Vulkan | 7268 | 13580 |
| 2160p Vulkan | 2451 | 7899 |
| 1080p OpenGL | 10099 | 16844 |
| 1440p OpenGL | 7275 | 12892 |
| 2160p OpenGL | 2784 | 7775 |
Tip: ▲ indicates a higher-is-better spec advantage, while ▼ indicates a lower-is-better advantage.
PERFORMANCE CHART COMPARISON OF GeForce RTX 4060 Ti (16GB) AND GeForce RTX 5070 Ti
The charts below visualize how GeForce RTX 4060 Ti (16GB) and GeForce RTX 5070 Ti stack up in key performance metrics.
Radar Chart Comparison
Bullet Chart Comparison
Release Timeline of GeForce RTX 4060 Ti (16GB) and GeForce RTX 5070 Ti
GeForce RTX 4060 Ti (16GB) was released 1 year, 7 months, 2 days earlier than GeForce RTX 5070 Ti.
Value For Money Calculator
Prices use available launch or current data. Enter your own prices to see which GPU gives better value.
GeForce RTX 4060 Ti (16GB)
GeForce RTX 5070 Ti
Calculating...
Domain Score Summary
Scores are generated by Comparigon's scoring algorithm and are intended as a high-level guide. They may not map 1-to-1 with the individual spec-by-spec comparisons shown in the table.
Our Verdict
In conclusion, the GeForce RTX 5070 Ti dominates overall compared to the GeForce RTX 4060 Ti (16GB). It comes out ahead across every comparable key area.
Try to Compare Again One of These GPUs With Another GPU
Pick which GPU to keep, then search for the other GPU to compare.
Disclaimer: Specs, pricing, and benchmarks are sourced from official manufacturer data and verified test results. While we strive for precision, product details and pricing may change. Comparigon may earn an affiliate commission on qualifying purchases.