GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop VS Radeon RX 7700S
We are comparing the GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop (NVIDIA) with the Radeon RX 7700S (AMD). Scroll down to the pros and cons of each graphics card, in-depth specs, and gaming benchmarks.
Last Updated: November 2, 2026
Overall Comparison
KEY DIFFERENCES OF GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop AND Radeon RX 7700S
Here’s how GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop and Radeon RX 7700S stack up against each other in their most impactful areas.
Reasons to consider the GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop
-
12% higher 4K Ultra FPS (38 vs 34)
-
10% higher 1440p Ultra FPS (68 vs 62)
-
3% higher 1080p Ultra FPS (92 vs 89)
-
9% higher 3DMark Port Royal score (5819 vs 5346)
-
12% higher PassMark G3D Mark score (17398 vs 15485)
Reasons to consider the Radeon RX 7700S
-
30% higher Boost Clock (2500 MHz vs 1920 MHz)
-
3% higher PassMark GPU Compute score (7016 vs 6811)
-
76% higher FP32 Compute (20.48 TFLOPS vs 11.61 TFLOPS)
-
13% more memory bandwidth (288 GB/s vs 256 GB/s)
-
Higher bandwidth bus link (PCIe 4.0 x16)
SPECIFICATION TABLE COMPARISON OF GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop AND Radeon RX 7700S
Below is the detailed specification table comparing GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop and Radeon RX 7700S.
Note: Highlighted specs mean that GPU wins that spec row.
If neither side is highlighted, it is a tie or there is not enough data for both specs.
| Specification | GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop | Radeon RX 7700S |
|---|---|---|
|
General Info
|
||
| GPU Name: | GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop | Radeon RX 7700S |
| GPU Type: | Laptop GPU | Discrete |
| Codename: | AD107 (GN21-X4) | Navi 33 |
| Vendor: | NVIDIA | AMD |
| Foundry: | TSMC | TSMC |
| Architecture: | Ada Lovelace | RDNA 3.0 |
| Generation: | GeForce 40 Mobile | Navi Mobile (RX 7000M) |
| Release Date: | January 3, 2023 | January 4, 2023 |
|
Board Design
|
||
| Bus Interface: | PCIe 4.0 x8 | PCIe 4.0 x16 |
| PCIe Version: | 4.0 | 4.0 |
| PCIe Lanes: | 8 | 16 |
| Process Size: | 5 nm | 6 nm |
| Transistors: | 18.9 billion | 13.3 billion |
| Density: | 121.15 MTr/mm² | 65.2 MTr/mm² |
| Die Size: | 159 mm² | 204 mm² |
| Total Graphics Power (TGP): | 35-140 W | 100 W |
|
Graphics Processor
|
||
| Compute Units: | 24 | 32 |
| Shading Units: | 3072 | 2048 |
| Texture Mapping Units (TMUs): | 96 | 128 |
| Render Output Units (ROPs): | 48 | 64 |
| Tensor Cores: | 96 | 64 |
| Ray Tracing Cores: | 24 | 32 |
| Base Clock: | 1140-2295 MHz | 1500 MHz |
| Boost Clock: | 1470-2370 MHz | 2500 MHz |
| L1 Cache: | 128 KB per cluster | 128 KB per Array |
| L2 Cache: | 32 MB | 2 MB |
| L3 Cache: | — | 32 MB |
|
Raw Performance
|
||
| Pixel Fill Rate: | 90.72 GPixel/s | 160.0 GPixel/s |
| Texture Fill Rate: | 181.4 GTexel/s | 320.0 GTexel/s |
| FP32 Performance: | 11.61 TFLOPs | 20.48 TFLOPs |
|
Memory
|
||
| Memory Type: | GDDR6 | GDDR6 |
| Memory Size: | 8 GB | 8 GB |
| Memory Bus Width: | 128-bit | 128-bit |
| Memory Clock: | 2000 MHz | 2250 MHz |
| Effective Memory Speed: | 16000 Mbps | 18000 Mbps |
| Bandwidth: | 256 GB/s | 288 GB/s |
|
APIs
|
||
| DirectX: | 12 Ultimate (12_2) | 12.2 |
| Vulkan: | 1.4 | 1.4 |
| OpenGL: | 4.6 | 4.6 |
| OpenCL: | 3.0 | 2.2 |
| CUDA: | 8.9 | — |
| Ray Tracing: | 1 | 1 |
| DLSS: | DLSS 3 | 0 |
| DisplayPort: | 1.4a | 2.1 |
|
Gaming FPS
|
||
| 1080p Ultra (FPS): | 92 | 89 |
| 1440p Ultra (FPS): | 68 | 62 |
| 4K Ultra (FPS): | 38 | 34 |
|
Benchmarks
|
||
|
3D Mark
|
||
| Steel Nomad Lite | 10222 | 9221 |
| Time Spy | 10404 | 10345 |
| Solar Bay | 44954 | 41066 |
| Port Royal | 5819 | 5346 |
| Fire Strike | 26492 | 28780 |
| Wild Life Extreme | 19817 | 17962 |
| Night Raid | 98341 | 101429 |
|
GeekBench 6 OpenCL
|
||
| Compute Score | 97986 | 75137 |
| Background Blur | 142.7 img/sec | 183.6 img/sec |
| Face Detection | 103.7 img/sec | 91.6 img/sec |
| Horizon Detection | 3.83 Gpixels/sec | 2.68 Gpixels/sec |
| Edge Detection | 4.93 Gpixels/sec | 3.95 Gpixels/sec |
| Gaussian Blur | 4.63 Gpixels/sec | 3.39 Gpixels/sec |
| Feature Matching | 1.27 Gpixels/sec | 0.84 Gpixels/sec |
| Stereo Matching | 430.4 Gpixels/sec | 244.3 Gpixels/sec |
| Particle Physics | 13519.5 | 9216.4 |
|
Passmark Graphics
|
||
| G3D Mark | 17398 | 15485 |
| G2D Mark | 731 | 765 |
| DirectX 11 | 156 | 137 |
| DirectX 12 | 72 | 67 |
| GPU Compute | 6811 | 7016 |
|
GFXBench 5
|
||
| Aztec Ruins High (4K) | — | 99.90 |
| Car Chase | — | 596.80 |
| Tessellation | — | 2489.20 |
| ALU 2 | — | 2970.70 |
| Driver Overhead 2 | — | 214.50 |
| API | — | OpenGL |
| OS | — | Windows |
|
Blender (Rendering)
|
||
| Blender Score | 3357 | 1146 |
|
GeekBench 6 ML
|
||
| Single Precision | 17683 | 18185 |
| Half Precision | 30738 | 23280 |
| Quantized | 13612 | 14842 |
| Image Classification | 7421 | 8076 |
| Image Segmentation | 19041 | 10203 |
| Image Super Resolution | 20913 | 22390 |
| Face Detection | 35464 | 29334 |
| Pose Estimation | 67110 | 84068 |
| Text Classification | 3086 | 3066 |
| Machine Translation | 4740 | 4439 |
| Object Detection | 8644 | 7062 |
| Depth Estimation | 32456 | 38916 |
| Style Transfer | 142039 | 160714 |
| Framework | ONNX | ONNX |
| Backend | DirectML | DirectML |
|
FurMark
|
||
| 1080p Vulkan | 8686 | 6154 |
| 1440p Vulkan | 5625 | 5262 |
| 2160p Vulkan | 2559 | — |
| 1080p OpenGL | 8272 | 6715 |
| 1440p OpenGL | 5828 | 5034 |
| 2160p OpenGL | 2324 | 1605 |
Tip: ▲ indicates a higher-is-better spec advantage, while ▼ indicates a lower-is-better advantage.
PERFORMANCE CHART COMPARISON OF GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop AND Radeon RX 7700S
The charts below visualize how GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop and Radeon RX 7700S stack up in key performance metrics.
Radar Chart Comparison
Bullet Chart Comparison
Value For Money Calculator
Prices use available launch or current data. Enter your own prices to see which GPU gives better value.
GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop
Radeon RX 7700S
Calculating...
Domain Score Summary
Scores are generated by Comparigon's scoring algorithm and are intended as a high-level guide. They may not map 1-to-1 with the individual spec-by-spec comparisons shown in the table.
Our Verdict
In conclusion, the GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop has a narrow overall lead compared to the Radeon RX 7700S. Its strongest advantages are in Gaming Performance, AI & Machine Learning, Hardware Architecture and Workstation. They are still fairly close in Energy Efficiency.
Try to Compare Again One of These GPUs With Another GPU
Pick which GPU to keep, then search for the other GPU to compare.
Frequently Asked Questions about GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop vs Radeon RX 7700S
GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop scores 0.6% higher than Radeon RX 7700S in 3DMark Time Spy (10,404 vs 10,345).
GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop scores 8.8% higher than Radeon RX 7700S in 3DMark Port Royal (5,819 vs 5,346).
GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop scores 30.4% higher than Radeon RX 7700S in Geekbench 6 OpenCL (97,986 vs 75,137).
GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop and Radeon RX 7700S have the same listed graphics memory capacity (8 GB vs 8 GB).
Radeon RX 7700S has 12.5% higher memory bandwidth than GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop (288 GB/s vs 256 GB/s).
Both list GDDR6 for memory type.
GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop lists 35-140 W for graphics power, while Radeon RX 7700S lists 100 W for graphics power.
GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop scores 192.9% higher than Radeon RX 7700S in Blender (3,357 vs 1,146).
GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop lists PCIe 4.0 x8 for bus interface, while Radeon RX 7700S lists PCIe 4.0 x16 for bus interface.
GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop was released on January 3, 2023. Radeon RX 7700S was released on January 4, 2023. Radeon RX 7700S was released 1 day after GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop.
Disclaimer: Specs, pricing, and benchmarks are sourced from official manufacturer data and verified test results. While we strive for precision, product details and pricing may change. Comparigon may earn an affiliate commission on qualifying purchases.