GeForce RTX 2070 SUPER VS Intel Arc A770
We are comparing the GeForce RTX 2070 SUPER (NVIDIA) with the Intel Arc A770 (Intel). Scroll down to the pros and cons of each graphics card, in-depth specs, and gaming benchmarks.
Last Updated: November 2, 2026
Overall Comparison
KEY DIFFERENCES OF GeForce RTX 2070 SUPER AND Intel Arc A770
Here’s how GeForce RTX 2070 SUPER and Intel Arc A770 stack up against each other in their most impactful areas.
Reasons to consider the GeForce RTX 2070 SUPER
-
6% higher 4K Ultra FPS (38 vs 36)
-
36% higher PassMark G3D Mark score (18141 vs 13327)
-
36% higher Blender score (2380 vs 1748)
-
27% higher PassMark GPU Compute score (7473 vs 5867)
Reasons to consider the Intel Arc A770
-
36% higher Boost Clock (2400 MHz vs 1770 MHz)
-
33% higher 3DMark Time Spy score (13556 vs 10167)
-
20% higher 3DMark Port Royal score (7226 vs 6032)
-
8% higher Geekbench 6 OpenCL score (113935 vs 105349)
-
117% higher FP32 Compute (19.66 TFLOPS vs 9.06 TFLOPS)
SPECIFICATION TABLE COMPARISON OF GeForce RTX 2070 SUPER AND Intel Arc A770
Below is the detailed specification table comparing GeForce RTX 2070 SUPER and Intel Arc A770.
Note: Highlighted specs mean that GPU wins that spec row.
If neither side is highlighted, it is a tie or there is not enough data for both specs.
| Specification | GeForce RTX 2070 SUPER | Intel Arc A770 |
|---|---|---|
|
General Info
|
||
| GPU Name: | GeForce RTX 2070 SUPER | Intel Arc A770 |
| GPU Type: | Discrete | Discrete |
| Codename: | TU104 | DG2-512 |
| Vendor: | NVIDIA | Intel |
| Foundry: | TSMC | TSMC |
| Architecture: | Turing | Xe-HPG |
| Generation: | GeForce 20 | Alchemist (Arc 7) |
| Release Date: | July 9, 2019 | October 12, 2022 |
|
Board Design
|
||
| Bus Interface: | PCIe 3.0 x16 | PCIe 4.0 x16 |
| PCIe Version: | 3.0 | 4.0 |
| PCIe Lanes: | 16 | x16 |
| Process Size: | 12 nm | 6 nm |
| Transistors: | 13.6 billion | 21 billion |
| Density: | 25.0 MTr/mm² | 51.72 MTr/mm² |
| Die Size: | 545 mm² | 406 mm² |
| Board Length: | 267 mm | — |
| Board Width: | 35 mm | — |
| Board Height: | 116 mm | — |
| Total Graphics Power (TGP): | 215 W | 225 W |
|
Graphics Processor
|
||
| Compute Units: | 40 | 32 |
| Shading Units: | 2560 | 4096 |
| Texture Mapping Units (TMUs): | 160 | 256 |
| Render Output Units (ROPs): | 64 | 128 |
| Tensor Cores: | 320 | 512 |
| Ray Tracing Cores: | 40 | 32 |
| Base Clock: | 1605 MHz | 2100 MHz |
| Boost Clock: | 1770 MHz | 2400 MHz |
| L1 Cache: | 64 KB (per SM) | — |
| L2 Cache: | 4 MB | 16 MB |
|
Raw Performance
|
||
| Pixel Fill Rate: | 113.3 GPixel/s | 307 GPixel/s |
| Texture Fill Rate: | 283.2 GTexel/s | 614 GTexel/s |
| FP32 Performance: | 9.062 TFLOPs | 19.66 TFLOPs |
|
Memory
|
||
| Memory Type: | GDDR6 | GDDR6 |
| Memory Size: | 8 GB | 16 GB |
| Memory Bus Width: | 256-bit | 256-bit |
| Memory Clock: | 1750 MHz | 2000 MHz |
| Effective Memory Speed: | 14000 Mbps | 16000 Mbps |
| Bandwidth: | 448 GB/s | 512 GB/s |
|
APIs
|
||
| DirectX: | 12 | 12 |
| Vulkan: | 1.3 | 1.3 |
| OpenGL: | 4.6 | 4.6 |
| OpenCL: | 3.0 | 3.0 |
| CUDA: | 7.5 | — |
| Ray Tracing: | 1 | Yes |
| DLSS: | DLSS 2 | No |
| DisplayPort: | 1.4a | 2.0 |
| HDMI: | 2.0 | 2.1 |
|
Gaming FPS
|
||
| 1080p Ultra (FPS): | 90 | 88 |
| 1440p Ultra (FPS): | 66 | 66 |
| 4K Ultra (FPS): | 38 | 36 |
|
Benchmarks
|
||
|
3D Mark
|
||
| Steel Nomad Lite | 10053 | 12643 |
| Time Spy | 10167 | 13556 |
| Solar Bay | 45882 | 51077 |
| Port Royal | 6032 | 7226 |
| Fire Strike | 25670 | 34234 |
| Wild Life Extreme | 20746 | 26250 |
| Night Raid | 102707 | 122688 |
|
GeekBench 6 OpenCL
|
||
| Compute Score | 105349 | 113935 |
| Background Blur | 166.7 img/sec | 175 |
| Face Detection | 103.3 img/sec | 98 |
| Horizon Detection | 4.21 Gpixels/sec | 3.63 |
| Edge Detection | 5.56 Gpixels/sec | 5.51 |
| Gaussian Blur | 5.58 Gpixels/sec | 8.51 |
| Feature Matching | 1.17 Gpixels/sec | 0.89 |
| Stereo Matching | 489.7 Gpixels/sec | 492.6 |
| Particle Physics | 13242.9 | 24819.2 |
|
Passmark Graphics
|
||
| G3D Mark | 18141 | 13327 |
| G2D Mark | 878 | 758 |
| DirectX 11 | 153 | 77 |
| DirectX 12 | 67 | 74 |
| GPU Compute | 7473 | 5867 |
|
GFXBench 5
|
||
| Aztec Ruins High (4K) | 111.60 | 220.60 |
| Aztec Ruins Normal | 575.00 | 792.80 |
| Car Chase | 513.30 | 539.00 |
| Manhattan 3.1.1 (1440p) | 473.30 | 517.90 |
| T-Rex | 2543.80 | 2854.60 |
| Tessellation | 2924.70 | 4205.30 |
| ALU 2 | 2749.60 | 3955.40 |
| Driver Overhead 2 | 284.10 | 287.50 |
| API | OpenGL | OpenGL |
| OS | Windows | Windows |
|
Blender (Rendering)
|
||
| Blender Score | 2380 | 1748 |
|
GeekBench 6 ML
|
||
| Single Precision | 16276 | 13344 |
| Half Precision | 27406 | 14119 |
| Quantized | 10983 | 10082 |
| Image Classification | 6648 | 5750 |
| Image Segmentation | 16442 | 16175 |
| Image Super Resolution | 15383 | 12997 |
| Face Detection | 32861 | 21409 |
| Pose Estimation | 66348 | 67820 |
| Text Classification | 2166 | 849 |
| Machine Translation | 4239 | 2627 |
| Object Detection | 8194 | 7465 |
| Depth Estimation | 26192 | 24186 |
| Style Transfer | 137642 | 183238 |
| Framework | ONNX | ONNX |
| Backend | DirectML | DirectML |
|
FurMark
|
||
| 1080p Vulkan | 8497 | 11127 |
| 1440p Vulkan | 5470 | 6512 |
| 2160p Vulkan | 2692 | 2993 |
| 1080p OpenGL | 8574 | 9965 |
| 1440p OpenGL | 5812 | 6247 |
| 2160p OpenGL | 2887 | 2959 |
Tip: ▲ indicates a higher-is-better spec advantage, while ▼ indicates a lower-is-better advantage.
PERFORMANCE CHART COMPARISON OF GeForce RTX 2070 SUPER AND Intel Arc A770
The charts below visualize how GeForce RTX 2070 SUPER and Intel Arc A770 stack up in key performance metrics.
Radar Chart Comparison
Bullet Chart Comparison
Value For Money Calculator
Prices use available launch or current data. Enter your own prices to see which GPU gives better value.
GeForce RTX 2070 SUPER
Intel Arc A770
Calculating...
Domain Score Summary
Scores are generated by Comparigon's scoring algorithm and are intended as a high-level guide. They may not map 1-to-1 with the individual spec-by-spec comparisons shown in the table.
Our Verdict
In conclusion, the Intel Arc A770 has a narrow overall lead compared to the GeForce RTX 2070 SUPER. Its strongest advantages are in Gaming Performance, Hardware Architecture and Workstation. The GeForce RTX 2070 SUPER is the better fit if your top priority is AI & Machine Learning and Energy Efficiency.
Try to Compare Again One of These GPUs With Another GPU
Pick which GPU to keep, then search for the other GPU to compare.
Frequently Asked Questions about GeForce RTX 2070 SUPER vs Intel Arc A770
Intel Arc A770 scores 33.3% higher than GeForce RTX 2070 SUPER in 3DMark Time Spy (13,556 vs 10,167).
Intel Arc A770 scores 19.8% higher than GeForce RTX 2070 SUPER in 3DMark Port Royal (7,226 vs 6,032).
Intel Arc A770 scores 8.2% higher than GeForce RTX 2070 SUPER in Geekbench 6 OpenCL (113,935 vs 105,349).
Intel Arc A770 has 100% more graphics memory than GeForce RTX 2070 SUPER (16 GB vs 8 GB).
Intel Arc A770 has 14.3% higher memory bandwidth than GeForce RTX 2070 SUPER (512 GB/s vs 448 GB/s).
Both list GDDR6 for memory type.
GeForce RTX 2070 SUPER lists 215 W for graphics power, while Intel Arc A770 lists 225 W for graphics power.
GeForce RTX 2070 SUPER scores 36.2% higher than Intel Arc A770 in Blender (2,380 vs 1,748).
GeForce RTX 2070 SUPER lists PCIe 3.0 x16 for bus interface, while Intel Arc A770 lists PCIe 4.0 x16 for bus interface.
GeForce RTX 2070 SUPER was released on July 9, 2019. Intel Arc A770 was released on October 12, 2022. Intel Arc A770 was released 1191 days after GeForce RTX 2070 SUPER.
Disclaimer: Specs, pricing, and benchmarks are sourced from official manufacturer data and verified test results. While we strive for precision, product details and pricing may change. Comparigon may earn an affiliate commission on qualifying purchases.