GeForce GTX 1660 SUPER VS Radeon RX 9070 XT
We are comparing the GeForce GTX 1660 SUPER (NVIDIA) with the Radeon RX 9070 XT (AMD). Scroll down to the pros and cons of each graphics card, in-depth specs, and gaming benchmarks.
Last Updated: September 20, 2026
Overall Comparison
KEY DIFFERENCES OF GeForce GTX 1660 SUPER AND Radeon RX 9070 XT
Here’s how GeForce GTX 1660 SUPER and Radeon RX 9070 XT stack up against each other in their most impactful areas.
Why Radeon RX 9070 XT is the best choice:
-
345% higher 4K Ultra FPS (89 vs 20)
-
287% higher 1440p Ultra FPS (151 vs 39)
-
251% higher 1080p Ultra FPS (193 vs 55)
-
66% higher Boost Clock (2970 MHz vs 1785 MHz)
-
393% higher 3DMark Time Spy score (29803 vs 6045)
SPECIFICATION TABLE COMPARISON OF GeForce GTX 1660 SUPER AND Radeon RX 9070 XT
Below is the detailed specification table comparing GeForce GTX 1660 SUPER and Radeon RX 9070 XT.
Note: Highlighted specs mean that GPU wins that spec row.
If neither side is highlighted, it is a tie or there is not enough data for both specs.
| Specification | GeForce GTX 1660 SUPER | Radeon RX 9070 XT |
|---|---|---|
|
General Info
|
||
| GPU Name: | GeForce GTX 1660 SUPER | Radeon RX 9070 XT |
| GPU Type: | Discrete | Discrete |
| Codename: | TU116 | — |
| Vendor: | NVIDIA | AMD |
| Foundry: | TSMC | TSMC |
| Architecture: | Turing | RDNA 4.0 |
| Generation: | GeForce 16 | Navi IV (RX 9000) |
| Release Date: | October 29, 2019 | March 6, 2025 |
|
Board Design
|
||
| Bus Interface: | PCIe 3.0 x16 | PCIe 5.0 x16 |
| PCIe Version: | 3.0 | 5.0 |
| PCIe Lanes: | 16 | x16 |
| Process Size: | 12 nm | 4 nm |
| Transistors: | 6.6 billion | 53.9 billion |
| Density: | 23.2 MTr/mm² | 151.19 MTr/mm² |
| Die Size: | 284 mm² | 356.5 |
| Board Length: | 229 mm | — |
| Board Width: | 35 mm | — |
| Board Height: | 111 mm | — |
| Total Graphics Power (TGP): | 125 W | 304 W |
|
Graphics Processor
|
||
| Compute Units: | 22 | 64 |
| Shading Units: | 1408 | 4096 |
| Texture Mapping Units (TMUs): | 88 | 256 |
| Render Output Units (ROPs): | 48 | 128 |
| Tensor Cores: | — | 128 |
| Ray Tracing Cores: | — | 64 |
| Base Clock: | 1530 MHz | 1660 |
| Boost Clock: | 1785 MHz | 2970 |
| L1 Cache: | 64 KB (per SM) | 128KB per cluster |
| L2 Cache: | 1536 KB | 4MB shared |
|
Raw Performance
|
||
| Pixel Fill Rate: | 85.68 GPixel/s | 380.2 GPixel/s |
| Texture Fill Rate: | 157.1 GTexel/s | 760.3 GTexel/s |
| FP32 Performance: | 5.027 TFLOPs | 48.66 TFLOPs |
|
Memory
|
||
| Memory Type: | GDDR6 | GDDR6 |
| Memory Size: | 6 GB | 16 GB |
| Memory Bus Width: | 192-bit | 256-bit |
| Memory Clock: | 1750 MHz | 2518 |
| Effective Memory Speed: | 14000 Mbps | 20100 |
| Bandwidth: | 336 GB/s | 640 |
|
APIs
|
||
| DirectX: | 12.1 | 12.2 |
| Vulkan: | 1.4 | 1.3 |
| OpenGL: | 4.6 | 4.6 |
| OpenCL: | 3.0 | 2.2 |
| CUDA: | 7.5 | No |
| Ray Tracing: | 0 | Yes |
| DLSS: | 0 | No |
| DisplayPort: | 1.4a | 2.1a |
| HDMI: | 2.0 | — |
|
Gaming FPS
|
||
| 1080p Ultra (FPS): | 55 | 193 |
| 1440p Ultra (FPS): | 39 | 151 |
| 4K Ultra (FPS): | 20 | 89 |
|
Benchmarks
|
||
|
3D Mark
|
||
| Steel Nomad Lite | 5670 | 26116 |
| Time Spy | 6045 | 29803 |
| Solar Bay | 19268 | 120093 |
| Port Royal | 1547 | 18556 |
| Fire Strike | 16187 | 66408 |
| Wild Life Extreme | 12327 | 54361 |
| Night Raid | 74636 | 196877 |
|
GeekBench 6 OpenCL
|
||
| Compute Score | 67074 | 182816 |
| Background Blur | 122.5 img/sec | 427.4 img/sec |
| Face Detection | 68.6 img/sec | 251 img/sec |
| Horizon Detection | 2.56 Gpixels/sec | 6.77 Gpixels/sec |
| Edge Detection | 3.33 Gpixels/sec | 9.42 Gpixels/sec |
| Gaussian Blur | 3.21 Gpixels/sec | 9.35 Gpixels/sec |
| Feature Matching | 0.86 Gpixels/sec | 1.42 Gpixels/sec |
| Stereo Matching | 273.3 Gpixels/sec | 651.4 Gpixels/sec |
| Particle Physics | 8476.3 | 23630 FPS |
|
Passmark Graphics
|
||
| G3D Mark | 12684 | 26866 |
| G2D Mark | 807 | 1320 |
| DirectX 11 | 104 | 294 |
| DirectX 12 | 50 | 77 |
| GPU Compute | 5050 | 15958 Ops/s |
|
GFXBench 5
|
||
| Aztec Ruins High (4K) | 70.20 | 313.30 |
| Aztec Ruins Normal | 396.10 | 1794.90 |
| Car Chase | 340.70 | 1498.00 |
| Manhattan 3.1.1 (1440p) | 304.70 | 1199.30 |
| T-Rex | 1502.80 | 5080.10 |
| Tessellation | 1760.20 | 6928.50 |
| ALU 2 | 1607.10 | 9196.70 |
| Driver Overhead 2 | 272.10 | 339.10 |
| API | OpenGL | OpenGL |
| OS | Windows | Windows |
|
Blender (Rendering)
|
||
| Blender Score | 783 | 3116 |
|
GeekBench 6 ML
|
||
| Single Precision | 10238 | 39190 |
| Half Precision | 8153 | 55727 |
| Quantized | 7392 | 33599 |
| Image Classification | 4278 | 18001 |
| Image Segmentation | 5856 | 25174 |
| Image Super Resolution | 9561 | 45714 |
| Face Detection | 9830 | 74776 |
| Pose Estimation | 36109 | 196137 |
| Text Classification | 1858 | 5163 |
| Machine Translation | 3286 | 8677 |
| Object Detection | 5151 | 19602 |
| Depth Estimation | 18021 | 74879 |
| Style Transfer | 73708 | 411302 |
| Framework | ONNX | ONNX |
| Backend | DirectML | DirectML |
|
FurMark
|
||
| 1080p Vulkan | 4601 | 19161 |
| 1440p Vulkan | 2909 | 14200 |
| 2160p Vulkan | 1405 | 7713 |
| 1080p OpenGL | 4621 | 20135 |
| 1440p OpenGL | 3306 | 14412 |
| 2160p OpenGL | 1647 | 7754 |
Tip: ▲ indicates a higher-is-better spec advantage, while ▼ indicates a lower-is-better advantage.
PERFORMANCE CHART COMPARISON OF GeForce GTX 1660 SUPER AND Radeon RX 9070 XT
The charts below visualize how GeForce GTX 1660 SUPER and Radeon RX 9070 XT stack up in key performance metrics.
Radar Chart Comparison
Bullet Chart Comparison
Release Timeline of GeForce GTX 1660 SUPER and Radeon RX 9070 XT
GeForce GTX 1660 SUPER was released 5 years, 4 months, 5 days earlier than Radeon RX 9070 XT.
Value For Money Calculator
Prices use available launch or current data. Enter your own prices to see which GPU gives better value.
GeForce GTX 1660 SUPER
Radeon RX 9070 XT
Calculating...
Domain Score Summary
Scores are generated by Comparigon's scoring algorithm and are intended as a high-level guide. They may not map 1-to-1 with the individual spec-by-spec comparisons shown in the table.
Our Verdict
In conclusion, the Radeon RX 9070 XT dominates overall compared to the GeForce GTX 1660 SUPER. It comes out ahead across every comparable key area.
Try to Compare Again One of These GPUs With Another GPU
Pick which GPU to keep, then search for the other GPU to compare.
Disclaimer: Specs, pricing, and benchmarks are sourced from official manufacturer data and verified test results. While we strive for precision, product details and pricing may change. Comparigon may earn an affiliate commission on qualifying purchases.