GeForce GTX 1650 VS GeForce GTX 1650 SUPER
We are comparing the GeForce GTX 1650 ( NVIDIA ) head-to-head with the GeForce GTX 1650 SUPER ( NVIDIA ) . You’ll get the key pros and cons of each graphics card, in-depth specs, and gaming benchmarks.
Note: This comparison of GeForce GTX 1650 vs. GeForce GTX 1650 SUPER is based on Comparigon's analysis and is for informational purposes only.
Last Updated: August 21, 2026
Overall Comparison
KEY DIFFERENCES OF GeForce GTX 1650 AND GeForce GTX 1650 SUPER
Here’s how GeForce GTX 1650 and GeForce GTX 1650 SUPER stack up against each other in their most impactful areas. Use these bullets to see at a glance which graphics card excels where.
Why GeForce GTX 1650 SUPER is the best choice:
-
36% higher 4K Ultra FPS (15 vs 11)
-
43% higher 1440p Ultra FPS (30 vs 21)
-
34% higher 1080p Ultra FPS (43 vs 32)
-
4% higher Boost Clock (1725 MHz vs 1665 MHz)
-
32% higher 3DMark Time Spy score (4691 vs 3562)
SPECIFICATION TABLE COMPARISON OF GeForce GTX 1650 AND GeForce GTX 1650 SUPER
Below is the detailed specification table comparing GeForce GTX 1650 and GeForce GTX 1650 SUPER.
Note: Highlighted specs mean that GPU wins that spec row.
If neither side is highlighted, it is a tie or there is not enough data for both specs.
| Specification | GeForce GTX 1650 | GeForce GTX 1650 SUPER |
|---|---|---|
|
General Info
|
||
| GPU Name: | GeForce GTX 1650 | GeForce GTX 1650 SUPER |
| GPU Type: | Discrete | Discrete |
| Codename: | TU117 | TU116 |
| Vendor: | NVIDIA | NVIDIA |
| Foundry: | TSMC | TSMC |
| Architecture: | Turing | Turing |
| Generation: | GeForce 16 | GeForce 16 |
| Release Date: | April 23, 2019 | November 22, 2019 |
|
Board Design
|
||
| Bus Interface: | PCIe 3.0 x16 | PCIe 3.0 x16 |
| PCIe Version: | 3.0 | 3.0 |
| PCIe Lanes: | 16 | 16 |
| Process Size: | 12 nm | 12 nm |
| Transistors: | 4.7 billion | 6.6 billion |
| Density: | 23.5 MTr/mm² | 23.2 MTr/mm² |
| Die Size: | 200 mm² | 284 mm² |
| Board Length: | 229 mm | 229 mm |
| Board Width: | 35 mm | 35 mm |
| Board Height: | 111 mm | 111 mm |
| Total Graphics Power (TGP): | 75 W | 100 W |
|
Graphics Processor
|
||
| Compute Units: | 14 | 20 |
| Shading Units: | 896 | 1280 |
| Texture Mapping Units (TMUs): | 56 | 80 |
| Render Output Units (ROPs): | 32 | 32 |
| Base Clock: | 1485 MHz | 1530 MHz |
| Boost Clock: | 1665 MHz | 1725 MHz |
| L1 Cache: | 64 KB (per SM) | 64 KB (per SM) |
| L2 Cache: | 1024 KB | 1024 KB |
|
Raw Performance
|
||
| Pixel Fill Rate: | 53.28 GPixel/s | 55.20 GPixel/s |
| Texture Fill Rate: | 93.24 GTexel/s | 138.0 GTexel/s |
| FP32 Performance: | 2.984 TFLOPs | 4.416 TFLOPs |
|
Memory
|
||
| Memory Type: | GDDR5 | GDDR6 |
| Memory Size: | 4 GB | 4 GB |
| Memory Bus Width: | 128-bit | 128-bit |
| Memory Clock: | 2001 MHz | 1500 MHz |
| Effective Memory Speed: | 8000 Mbps | 12000 Mbps |
| Bandwidth: | 128.1 GB/s | 192 GB/s |
|
APIs
|
||
| DirectX: | 12 (12_1) | 12 (12_1) |
| Vulkan: | 1.4 | 1.4 |
| OpenGL: | 4.6 | 4.6 |
| OpenCL: | 3.0 | 3.0 |
| CUDA: | 7.5 | 7.5 |
| DisplayPort: | 1.4a | 1.4a |
| HDMI: | 2.0 | 2.0 |
|
Gaming FPS
|
||
| 1080p Ultra (FPS): | 32 | 43 |
| 1440p Ultra (FPS): | 21 | 30 |
| 4K Ultra (FPS): | 11 | 15 |
|
Benchmarks
|
||
|
3D Mark
|
||
| Steel Nomad Lite | 3416 | 4387 |
| Time Spy | 3562 | 4691 |
| Solar Bay | 12278 | — |
| Fire Strike | 9691 | 12262 |
| Wild Life Extreme | 7360 | 9631 |
| Night Raid | 46157 | 59980 |
|
GeekBench 6 OpenCL
|
||
| Compute Score | 39481 | 57455 |
| Background Blur | 66.4 img/sec | 106.6 img/sec |
| Face Detection | 43.3 img/sec | 58.3 img/sec |
| Horizon Detection | 1.51 Gpixels/sec | 1.98 Gpixels/sec |
| Edge Detection | 1.68 Gpixels/sec | 2.67 Gpixels/sec |
| Gaussian Blur | 1.87 Gpixels/sec | 2.79 Gpixels/sec |
| Feature Matching | 0.49 Gpixels/sec | 0.75 Gpixels/sec |
| Stereo Matching | 187.9 Gpixels/sec | 248.2 Gpixels/sec |
| Particle Physics | 5261.5 | 7783.2 |
|
Passmark Graphics
|
||
| G3D Mark | 7871 | 10186 |
| G2D Mark | 553 | 749 |
| DirectX 11 | 58 | 73 |
| DirectX 12 | 35 | 45 |
| GPU Compute | 3035 | 4460 |
|
Blender (Rendering)
|
||
| Blender Score | 451 | 565 |
|
GeekBench 6 ML
|
||
| Single Precision | 7569 | 8531 |
| Half Precision | 5940 | 7319 |
| Quantized | 5581 | 6132 |
| Image Classification | 3208 | 3533 |
| Image Segmentation | 4254 | 5144 |
| Image Super Resolution | 7050 | 7927 |
| Face Detection | 6849 | 8860 |
| Pose Estimation | 23562 | 30433 |
| Text Classification | 1755 | 1622 |
| Machine Translation | 3096 | 2754 |
| Object Detection | 3710 | 4278 |
| Depth Estimation | 12946 | 15240 |
| Style Transfer | 48894 | 66527 |
| Framework | ONNX | ONNX |
| Backend | DirectML | DirectML |
|
FurMark
|
||
| 1080p Vulkan | — | 2958 |
| 1440p Vulkan | — | 2062 |
| 2160p Vulkan | — | 1008 |
| 1080p OpenGL | — | 3136 |
| 1440p OpenGL | — | 2223 |
| 2160p OpenGL | — | 1207 |
Tip: ▲ indicates a higher-is-better spec advantage, while ▼ indicates a lower-is-better advantage.
PERFORMANCE CHART COMPARISON OF GeForce GTX 1650 AND GeForce GTX 1650 SUPER
The charts below visualize how GeForce GTX 1650 and GeForce GTX 1650 SUPER stack up in key performance metrics.
Radar Chart Comparison
Bullet Chart Comparison
Release Timeline of GeForce GTX 1650 and GeForce GTX 1650 SUPER
GeForce GTX 1650 was released 6 months, 30 days earlier than GeForce GTX 1650 SUPER.
Value For Money Calculator
Prices use available launch or current data. Enter your own prices to see which GPU gives better value.
GeForce GTX 1650
GeForce GTX 1650 SUPER
Calculating...
Domain Score Summary
Note: Scores (0 to 100) are generated by Comparigon’s scoring algorithm and are intended as a high-level guide. They may not map 1-to-1 with the individual spec-by-spec comparisons shown in the table.
Our Verdict
In conclusion, the GeForce GTX 1650 SUPER edges out overall compared to the GeForce GTX 1650. Its strongest advantages are in Gaming Performance, AI & Machine Learning, Hardware Architecture and Workstation. The GeForce GTX 1650 is the better fit if your top priority is Energy Efficiency.
Try to Compare Again One of These GPUs With Another GPU
Pick which GPU to keep, then search for the other GPU to compare.