Arc A750 VS GeForce RTX 4080
We are comparing the Arc A750 (Intel) with the GeForce RTX 4080 (NVIDIA). Scroll down to the pros and cons of each graphics card, in-depth specs, and gaming benchmarks.
Last Updated: September 20, 2026
Overall Comparison
KEY DIFFERENCES OF Arc A750 AND GeForce RTX 4080
Here’s how Arc A750 and GeForce RTX 4080 stack up against each other in their most impactful areas.
Reasons to consider the Arc A750
-
Newer DisplayPort Version (2.0)
Reasons to consider the GeForce RTX 4080
-
172% higher 4K Ultra FPS (87 vs 32)
-
149% higher 1440p Ultra FPS (147 vs 59)
-
135% higher 1080p Ultra FPS (186 vs 79)
-
4% higher Boost Clock (2505 MHz vs 2400 MHz)
-
127% higher 3DMark Time Spy score (28164 vs 12427)
SPECIFICATION TABLE COMPARISON OF Arc A750 AND GeForce RTX 4080
Below is the detailed specification table comparing Arc A750 and GeForce RTX 4080.
Note: Highlighted specs mean that GPU wins that spec row.
If neither side is highlighted, it is a tie or there is not enough data for both specs.
| Specification | Arc A750 | GeForce RTX 4080 |
|---|---|---|
|
General Info
|
||
| GPU Name: | Arc A750 | GeForce RTX 4080 |
| GPU Type: | Discrete | Discrete |
| Codename: | DG2-512 | AD103 |
| Vendor: | Intel | NVIDIA |
| Foundry: | TSMC | TSMC |
| Architecture: | Xe-HPG | Ada Lovelace |
| Generation: | Alchemist (Arc 7) | GeForce 40 |
| Release Date: | October 12, 2022 | September 20, 2022 |
|
Board Design
|
||
| Bus Interface: | PCIe 4.0 x16 | PCIe 4.0 x16 |
| PCIe Version: | 4.0 | 4.0 |
| PCIe Lanes: | 16 | x16 |
| Process Size: | 6 nm | 5 nm |
| Transistors: | 21.7 billion | 45 billion |
| Density: | 53.4 MTr/mm² | 118.73 MTr/mm² |
| Die Size: | 406 mm² | 379 |
| Board Length: | — | 304 mm |
| Board Width: | — | 61 mm |
| Board Height: | — | 137 mm |
| Total Graphics Power (TGP): | 225 W | 320 W |
|
Graphics Processor
|
||
| Compute Units: | 28 | 76 |
| Shading Units: | 3584 | 9728 |
| Texture Mapping Units (TMUs): | 224 | 304 |
| Render Output Units (ROPs): | 112 | 112 |
| Tensor Cores: | 448 | 304 |
| Ray Tracing Cores: | 28 | 76 |
| Base Clock: | 2050 MHz | 2205 |
| Boost Clock: | 2400 MHz | 2505 |
| L1 Cache: | — | 128KB per cluster |
| L2 Cache: | 16 MB | 64MB shared |
|
Raw Performance
|
||
| Pixel Fill Rate: | 268.8 GPixel/s | 280.6 GPixel/s |
| Texture Fill Rate: | 537.6 GTexel/s | 761.5 GTexel/s |
| FP32 Performance: | 17.20 TFLOPs | 48.74 TFLOPs |
|
Memory
|
||
| Memory Type: | GDDR6 | GDDR6X |
| Memory Size: | 8 GB | 16 GB |
| Memory Bus Width: | 256-bit | 256-bit |
| Memory Clock: | 2000 MHz | 1400 |
| Effective Memory Speed: | 16000 Mbps | 22400 |
| Bandwidth: | 512 GB/s | 716.8 |
|
APIs
|
||
| DirectX: | 12.2 | 12 |
| Vulkan: | 1.4 | 1.3 |
| OpenGL: | 4.6 | 4.6 |
| OpenCL: | 3.0 | 3.0 |
| CUDA: | — | 8.9 |
| Ray Tracing: | 1 | Yes |
| DLSS: | 0 | DLSS 3 |
| DisplayPort: | 2.0 | 1.4a |
| HDMI: | 2.1 | 2.1a |
|
Gaming FPS
|
||
| 1080p Ultra (FPS): | 79 | 186 |
| 1440p Ultra (FPS): | 59 | 147 |
| 4K Ultra (FPS): | 32 | 87 |
|
Benchmarks
|
||
|
3D Mark
|
||
| Steel Nomad Lite | 10857 | 30169 |
| Time Spy | 12427 | 28164 |
| Solar Bay | 45632 | 136859 |
| Port Royal | 6591 | 17979 |
| Fire Strike | 30560 | 64634 |
| Wild Life Extreme | 23654 | 59108 |
| Night Raid | 110821 | 184754 |
|
GeekBench 6 OpenCL
|
||
| Compute Score | 99280 | 217712 |
| Background Blur | 145.2 img/sec | 250.4 img/sec |
| Face Detection | 82 img/sec | 190 img/sec |
| Horizon Detection | 3.35 Gpixels/sec | 9.56 Gpixels/sec |
| Edge Detection | 5.01 Gpixels/sec | 12.8 Gpixels/sec |
| Gaussian Blur | 7.59 Gpixels/sec | 15.3 Gpixels/sec |
| Feature Matching | 0.81 Gpixels/sec | 1.97 Gpixels/sec |
| Stereo Matching | 462.4 Gpixels/sec | 1130 Gpixels/sec |
| Particle Physics | 18623.1 | 28795.5 FPS |
|
Passmark Graphics
|
||
| G3D Mark | 12620 | 34445 |
| G2D Mark | 737 | 1249 |
| DirectX 9 | — | 373 |
| DirectX 10 | — | 202 |
| DirectX 11 | 73 | 313 |
| DirectX 12 | 70 | 132 |
| GPU Compute | 5307 | 20450 |
|
GFXBench 5
|
||
| Aztec Ruins High (4K) | 137.90 | 320.90 |
| Aztec Ruins Normal | 732.40 | 1476.20 |
| Car Chase | 471.70 | 1250.00 |
| Manhattan 3.1.1 (1440p) | 465.40 | 1062.90 |
| T-Rex | 2668.40 | 5492.10 |
| Tessellation | 3725.60 | 9274.80 |
| ALU 2 | 3065.60 | 9330.70 |
| Driver Overhead 2 | 170.60 | 291.30 |
| API | OpenGL | OpenGL |
| OS | Windows | Windows |
|
Blender (Rendering)
|
||
| Blender Score | 1924 | 8765 |
|
GeekBench 6 ML
|
||
| Single Precision | 12178 | 36799 |
| Half Precision | 12796 | 53331 |
| Quantized | 9086 | 28104 |
| Image Classification | 5475 | 13466 |
| Image Segmentation | 13781 | 34767 |
| Image Super Resolution | 11612 | 42687 |
| Face Detection | 18556 | 70927 |
| Pose Estimation | 58801 | 239350 |
| Text Classification | 824 | 3606 |
| Machine Translation | 2397 | 6519 |
| Object Detection | 6895 | 18153 |
| Depth Estimation | 22219 | 65667 |
| Style Transfer | 161148 | 414848 |
| Framework | ONNX | ONNX |
| Backend | DirectML | DirectML |
|
FurMark
|
||
| 1080p Vulkan | 9414 | 15032 |
| 1440p Vulkan | 5690 | 8109 |
| 2160p Vulkan | 2871 | 7752 |
| 1080p OpenGL | 8547 | 20826 |
| 1440p OpenGL | 5580 | 21847 |
| 2160p OpenGL | 2701 | 15200 |
Tip: ▲ indicates a higher-is-better spec advantage, while ▼ indicates a lower-is-better advantage.
PERFORMANCE CHART COMPARISON OF Arc A750 AND GeForce RTX 4080
The charts below visualize how Arc A750 and GeForce RTX 4080 stack up in key performance metrics.
Radar Chart Comparison
Bullet Chart Comparison
Release Timeline of Arc A750 and GeForce RTX 4080
GeForce RTX 4080 was released 22 days earlier than Arc A750.
Value For Money Calculator
Prices use available launch or current data. Enter your own prices to see which GPU gives better value.
Arc A750
GeForce RTX 4080
Calculating...
Domain Score Summary
Scores are generated by Comparigon's scoring algorithm and are intended as a high-level guide. They may not map 1-to-1 with the individual spec-by-spec comparisons shown in the table.
Our Verdict
In conclusion, the GeForce RTX 4080 dominates overall compared to the Arc A750. It comes out ahead across every comparable key area.
Try to Compare Again One of These GPUs With Another GPU
Pick which GPU to keep, then search for the other GPU to compare.
Disclaimer: Specs, pricing, and benchmarks are sourced from official manufacturer data and verified test results. While we strive for precision, product details and pricing may change. Comparigon may earn an affiliate commission on qualifying purchases.