Arc A750 VS GeForce RTX 4060
We are comparing the Arc A750 ( Intel ) head-to-head with the GeForce RTX 4060 ( NVIDIA ) . You’ll get the key pros and cons of each graphics card, in-depth specs, and gaming benchmarks.
Note: This comparison of Arc A750 vs. GeForce RTX 4060 is based on Comparigon's analysis and is for informational purposes only.
Last Updated: August 21, 2026
KEY DIFFERENCES OF Arc A750 AND GeForce RTX 4060
Here’s how Arc A750 and GeForce RTX 4060 stack up against each other in their most impactful areas. Use these bullets to see at a glance which graphics card excels where.
Reasons to consider the Arc A750
-
17% higher 3DMark Time Spy score (12427 vs 10621)
-
9% higher 3DMark Port Royal score (6591 vs 6055)
-
14% higher FP32 Compute (17.2 TFLOPS vs 15.1 TFLOPS)
-
88% more memory bandwidth (512 GB/s vs 272 GB/s)
-
100% higher Memory Bus Width (256 Bit vs 128 Bit)
Reasons to consider the GeForce RTX 4060
-
19% higher 4K Ultra FPS (38 vs 32)
-
17% higher 1440p Ultra FPS (69 vs 59)
-
20% higher 1080p Ultra FPS (95 vs 79)
-
3% higher Boost Clock (2460 MHz vs 2400 MHz)
-
55% higher PassMark G3D Mark score (19523 vs 12620)
SPECIFICATION TABLE COMPARISON OF Arc A750 AND GeForce RTX 4060
Below is the detailed specification table comparing Arc A750 and GeForce RTX 4060.
Note: Highlighted specs mean that GPU wins that spec row.
If neither side is highlighted, it is a tie or there is not enough data for both specs.
| Specification | Arc A750 | GeForce RTX 4060 |
|---|---|---|
|
General Info
|
||
| GPU Name: | Arc A750 | GeForce RTX 4060 |
| GPU Type: | Discrete | Discrete |
| Codename: | DG2-512 | AD107 |
| Vendor: | Intel | NVIDIA |
| Foundry: | TSMC | TSMC |
| Architecture: | Xe-HPG | Ada Lovelace |
| Generation: | Alchemist (Arc 7) | GeForce 40 |
| Release Date: | October 12, 2022 | May 18, 2023 |
|
Board Design
|
||
| Bus Interface: | PCIe 4.0 x16 | PCIe 4.0 x8 |
| PCIe Version: | 4.0 | 4.0 |
| PCIe Lanes: | 16 | 8 |
| Process Size: | 6 nm | 5 nm |
| Transistors: | 21.7 billion | 18 billion |
| Density: | 53.4 MTr/mm² | 113.21 MTr/mm² |
| Die Size: | 406 mm² | 159 mm² |
| Total Graphics Power (TGP): | 225 W | 115 W |
|
Graphics Processor
|
||
| Compute Units: | 28 | 24 |
| Shading Units: | 3584 | 3072 |
| Texture Mapping Units (TMUs): | 224 | 96 |
| Render Output Units (ROPs): | 112 | 48 |
| Tensor Cores: | 448 | 96 |
| Ray Tracing Cores: | 28 | 24 |
| Base Clock: | 2050 MHz | 1830 MHz |
| Boost Clock: | 2400 MHz | 2460 MHz |
| L1 Cache: | — | 128 KB (per SM) |
| L2 Cache: | 16 MB | 24 MB |
|
Raw Performance
|
||
| Pixel Fill Rate: | 268.8 GPixel/s | 118 GPixel/s |
| Texture Fill Rate: | 537.6 GTexel/s | 236 GTexel/s |
| FP32 Performance: | 17.20 TFLOPs | 15.1 TFLOPs |
|
Memory
|
||
| Memory Type: | GDDR6 | GDDR6 |
| Memory Size: | 8 GB | 8 GB |
| Memory Bus Width: | 256-bit | 128-bit |
| Memory Clock: | 2000 MHz | 2125 MHz |
| Effective Memory Speed: | 16000 Mbps | 17000 Mbps |
| Bandwidth: | 512 GB/s | 272 GB/s |
|
APIs
|
||
| DirectX: | 12.2 | 12 |
| Vulkan: | 1.4 | 1.3 |
| OpenGL: | 4.6 | 4.6 |
| OpenCL: | 3.0 | 3.0 |
| CUDA: | — | 8.9 |
| Ray Tracing: | 1 | 1 |
| DLSS: | 0 | DLSS 3 |
| DisplayPort: | 2.0 | 1.4a |
| HDMI: | 2.1 | 2.1 |
|
Gaming FPS
|
||
| 1080p Ultra (FPS): | 79 | 95 |
| 1440p Ultra (FPS): | 59 | 69 |
| 4K Ultra (FPS): | 32 | 38 |
|
Benchmarks
|
||
|
3D Mark
|
||
| Steel Nomad Lite | 10857 | 10686 |
| Time Spy | 12427 | 10621 |
| Solar Bay | 45632 | 49249 |
| Port Royal | 6591 | 6055 |
| Fire Strike | 30560 | 28554 |
| Wild Life Extreme | 23654 | 20612 |
| Night Raid | 110821 | 121524 |
|
GeekBench 6 OpenCL
|
||
| Compute Score | 99280 | 106633 |
| Background Blur | 145.2 img/sec | 186.9 img/sec |
| Face Detection | 82 img/sec | 112.7 img/sec |
| Horizon Detection | 3.35 Gpixels/sec | 3.92 Gpixels/sec |
| Edge Detection | 5.01 Gpixels/sec | 5.16 Gpixels/sec |
| Gaussian Blur | 7.59 Gpixels/sec | 4.94 Gpixels/sec |
| Feature Matching | 0.81 Gpixels/sec | 1.34 Gpixels/sec |
| Stereo Matching | 462.4 Gpixels/sec | 446.2 Gpixels/sec |
| Particle Physics | 18623.1 | 14935.1 |
|
Passmark Graphics
|
||
| G3D Mark | 12620 | 19523 |
| G2D Mark | 737 | 1039 |
| DirectX 11 | 73 | 174 |
| DirectX 12 | 70 | 76 |
| GPU Compute | 5307 | 9185 |
|
GFXBench 5
|
||
| Aztec Ruins High (4K) | 137.90 | 118.30 |
| Aztec Ruins Normal | 732.40 | 709.00 |
| Car Chase | 471.70 | 615.40 |
| Manhattan 3.1.1 (1440p) | 465.40 | 496.10 |
| T-Rex | 2668.40 | 2635.80 |
| Tessellation | 3725.60 | 3372.60 |
| ALU 2 | 3065.60 | 3284.00 |
| Driver Overhead 2 | 170.60 | 280.80 |
| API | OpenGL | OpenGL |
| OS | Windows | Windows |
|
Blender (Rendering)
|
||
| Blender Score | 1924 | 3126 |
|
GeekBench 6 ML
|
||
| Single Precision | 12178 | 17857 |
| Half Precision | 12796 | 29214 |
| Quantized | 9086 | 14234 |
| Image Classification | 5475 | 7696 |
| Image Segmentation | 13781 | 13706 |
| Image Super Resolution | 11612 | 23289 |
| Face Detection | 18556 | 31126 |
| Pose Estimation | 58801 | 78361 |
| Text Classification | 824 | 3315 |
| Machine Translation | 2397 | 3491 |
| Object Detection | 6895 | 9386 |
| Depth Estimation | 22219 | 36778 |
| Style Transfer | 161148 | 148120 |
| Framework | ONNX | ONNX |
| Backend | DirectML | DirectML |
|
FurMark
|
||
| 1080p Vulkan | 9414 | 7053 |
| 1440p Vulkan | 5690 | 4629 |
| 2160p Vulkan | 2871 | 2014 |
| 1080p OpenGL | 8547 | 7212 |
| 1440p OpenGL | 5580 | 4995 |
| 2160p OpenGL | 2701 | 2165 |
Tip: ▲ indicates a higher-is-better spec advantage, while ▼ indicates a lower-is-better advantage.
PERFORMANCE CHART COMPARISON OF Arc A750 AND GeForce RTX 4060
The charts below visualize how Arc A750 and GeForce RTX 4060 stack up in key performance metrics.
Radar Chart Comparison
Bullet Chart Comparison
Release Timeline of Arc A750 and GeForce RTX 4060
Arc A750 was released 7 months, 6 days earlier than GeForce RTX 4060.
Value For Money Calculator
Prices use available launch or current data. Enter your own prices to see which GPU gives better value.
Arc A750
GeForce RTX 4060
Calculating...
Domain Score Summary
Note: Scores (0 to 100) are generated by Comparigon’s scoring algorithm and are intended as a high-level guide. They may not map 1-to-1 with the individual spec-by-spec comparisons shown in the table.
Our Verdict
In conclusion, the GeForce RTX 4060 dominates overall compared to the Arc A750. Its strongest advantages are in Gaming Performance, AI & Machine Learning, Workstation and Energy Efficiency. The Arc A750 is the better fit if your top priority is Hardware Architecture.
Try to Compare Again One of These GPUs With Another GPU
Pick which GPU to keep, then search for the other GPU to compare.