Intel Core Ultra X9 388H VS Intel Core Ultra X7 358H
We are comparing the Intel Core Ultra X9 388H (Intel) with the Intel Core Ultra X7 358H (Intel). Scroll down to the pros and cons of each processor, in-depth specs, and benchmark comparisons.
Overall Comparison
KEY DIFFERENCES OF Intel Core Ultra X9 388H AND Intel Core Ultra X7 358H
Here’s how Intel Core Ultra X9 388H and Intel Core Ultra X7 358H stack up against each other in their most impactful areas.
Why Intel Core Ultra X9 388H is the best choice:
-
6% higher P-core turbo frequency (5100 MHz vs 4800 MHz)
-
8% higher E-core turbo frequency (4000 MHz vs 3700 MHz)
-
11% higher P-core base frequency (2100 MHz vs 1900 MHz)
-
7% higher E-core base frequency (1600 MHz vs 1500 MHz)
-
16% higher Geekbench V6 multi-core score (17924 vs 15431)
-
11% higher Geekbench V6 single-core score (3066 vs 2763)
SPECIFICATION TABLE COMPARISON OF Intel Core Ultra X9 388H AND Intel Core Ultra X7 358H
Below is the detailed specification table comparing Intel Core Ultra X9 388H and Intel Core Ultra X7 358H.
Note: Highlighted specs mean that CPU wins that spec row.
If neither side is highlighted, it is a tie or there is not enough data for both specs.
| Specification | Intel Core Ultra X9 388H | Intel Core Ultra X7 358H |
|---|---|---|
|
General Information
|
||
| CPU Name: | Intel Core Ultra X9 388H | Intel Core Ultra X7 358H |
| Vendor: | Intel | Intel |
| Release Date: | January 5, 2026 | January 5, 2026 |
| Type: | Laptop | Laptop |
| Instruction Set: | x86-64 | x86-64 |
| Codename: | Panther Lake | Panther Lake |
|
Package and Thermals
|
||
| Manufacturing Process: | 2 nm | 2 nm |
| TDP (PL1): | 15-25 W | 15-25 W |
| Max Boost TDP (PL2): | 80 W | 80 W |
| Socket: | FCBGA2540 | FCBGA2540 |
| Max Temp (TJMax): | 100 C | 100 C |
|
CPU Cores
|
||
|
Total Cores
|
||
| Total Cores | 16 | 16 |
| Total Threads | 16 | 16 |
|
P-Cores
|
||
| P-Cores | 4 | 4 |
| P-Threads | 4 | 4 |
| P-Core Base Frequency | 2100 MHz | 1900 MHz |
| P-Core Turbo Frequency | 5100 MHz | 4800 MHz |
|
E-Cores
|
||
| E-Cores | 12 | 12 |
| E-Threads | 12 | 12 |
| E-Core Base Frequency | 1600 MHz | 1500 MHz |
| E-Core Turbo Frequency | 4000 MHz | 3700 MHz |
|
NPU
|
||
| NPU |
|
|
|
Cache and Bus
|
||
| Multiplier | Locked | Locked |
| Bus Frequency | 100 MHz | 100 MHz |
| L1 Cache | 192 KB | 192 KB |
| L2 Cache | 2.5 MB | 2.5 MB |
| L3 Cache | 18 MB | 18 MB |
|
Memory Support
|
||
| Memory Types: | LPDDR5X-9600 | LPDDR5X-9600 |
| Max Memory Size: | 96 GB | 96 GB |
| Memory Channels: | 2 | 2 |
| ECC Support: |
|
|
|
Benchmarks
|
||
|
Geekbench V6
|
||
| Multi-Core | 17924 | 15431 |
| Single-Core | 3066 | 2763 |
| File Compression | 1490 | 1350 |
| Clang Compression | 141 | 76 |
| HTML5 Browser | 477 | 433 |
| PDF Renderer | 540 | 447 |
| Text Processing | 323 | 289 |
| Background Blur | 62 | 66 |
| Photo Processing | 177 | 152 |
| Ray Tracing | 28 | 26 |
|
PassMark CPU
|
||
| Multi-Core | 39049 | 34562 |
| Single-Core | 4594 | 4093 |
| Integer Math | 90600 | 83200 |
| Floating Point | 112300 | 105600 |
| Prime Numbers | 381 | 350 |
| String Sorting | 48700 | 41800 |
| Data Encryption | 30000 | 26700 |
| Data Compression | 392300 | 346800 |
| Physics | 3460 | 3055 |
| Extended Instructions | 32900 | 28900 |
|
Cinebench 2024
|
||
| Multi-Core | 1324 | 1142 |
| Single-Core | 130 | 125 |
|
Blender
|
||
| Render Score | — | 282 |
Tip: ▲ indicates a higher-is-better spec advantage, while ▼ indicates a lower-is-better advantage.
PERFORMANCE CHART COMPARISON OF Intel Core Ultra X9 388H AND Intel Core Ultra X7 358H
The charts below visualize how Intel Core Ultra X9 388H and Intel Core Ultra X7 358H stack up in key performance metrics.
Performance Radar Chart
Performance Benchmarks
Value For Money Calculator
Prices use available launch or current data. Enter your own prices to see which CPU gives better value.
Intel Core Ultra X9 388H
Intel Core Ultra X7 358H
Calculating...
Domain Score Summary
Scores are generated by Comparigon's scoring algorithm and are intended as a high-level guide. They may not map 1-to-1 with the individual spec-by-spec comparisons shown in the table.
Our Verdict
In conclusion, the Intel Core Ultra X9 388H has a narrow overall lead compared to the Intel Core Ultra X7 358H. Its strongest advantages are in Single-Core Performance, Multi-Core Performance, CPU Architecture and Energy Efficiency. They are still fairly close in Memory Architecture.
Try to Compare Again One of These CPUs With Another CPU
Pick which CPU to keep, then search for the other CPU to compare.
Disclaimer: Specs, pricing, and benchmarks are sourced from official manufacturer data and verified test results. While we strive for precision, product details and pricing may change. Comparigon may earn an affiliate commission on qualifying purchases.