Intel Core Ultra X9 388H VS AMD Ryzen AI 7 350
We are comparing the Intel Core Ultra X9 388H (Intel) with the AMD Ryzen AI 7 350 (AMD). Scroll down to the pros and cons of each processor, in-depth specs, and benchmark comparisons.
Overall Comparison
KEY DIFFERENCES OF Intel Core Ultra X9 388H AND AMD Ryzen AI 7 350
Here’s how Intel Core Ultra X9 388H and AMD Ryzen AI 7 350 stack up against each other in their most impactful areas.
Reasons to consider the Intel Core Ultra X9 388H
-
100% more CPU cores (16 vs 8)
-
2% higher P-core turbo frequency (5100 MHz vs 5000 MHz)
-
14% higher E-core turbo frequency (4000 MHz vs 3500 MHz)
-
50% more efficient-core threads (12 vs 8)
-
200% more efficient cores (12 vs 4)
-
5% higher P-core base frequency (2100 MHz vs 2000 MHz)
Reasons to consider the AMD Ryzen AI 7 350
-
100% more performance-core threads (8 vs 4)
-
25% higher E-core base frequency (2000 MHz vs 1600 MHz)
-
Includes dedicated NPU acceleration
SPECIFICATION TABLE COMPARISON OF Intel Core Ultra X9 388H AND AMD Ryzen AI 7 350
Below is the detailed specification table comparing Intel Core Ultra X9 388H and AMD Ryzen AI 7 350.
Note: Highlighted specs mean that CPU wins that spec row.
If neither side is highlighted, it is a tie or there is not enough data for both specs.
| Specification | Intel Core Ultra X9 388H | AMD Ryzen AI 7 350 |
|---|---|---|
|
General Information
|
||
| CPU Name: | Intel Core Ultra X9 388H | AMD Ryzen AI 7 350 |
| Vendor: | Intel | AMD |
| Release Date: | January 5, 2026 | January 7, 2025 |
| Generation: | — | Ryzen AI 300 Series |
| Type: | Laptop | Laptop |
| Instruction Set: | x86-64 | x86-64 |
| Codename: | Panther Lake | Zen 5 (Krackan Point) |
| Foundry: | — | TSMC |
|
Package and Thermals
|
||
| Manufacturing Process: | 2 nm | 4 nm |
| TDP (PL1): | 15-25 W | 15-54 W |
| Max Boost TDP (PL2): | 80 W | — |
| Socket: | FCBGA2540 | FP8 |
| Max Temp (TJMax): | 100 C | 100 C |
|
CPU Cores
|
||
|
Total Cores
|
||
| Total Cores | 16 | 8 |
| Total Threads | 16 | 16 |
|
P-Cores
|
||
| P-Cores | 4 | 4 |
| P-Threads | 4 | 8 |
| P-Core Base Frequency | 2100 MHz | 2000 MHz |
| P-Core Turbo Frequency | 5100 MHz | 5000 MHz |
|
E-Cores
|
||
| E-Cores | 12 | 4 |
| E-Threads | 12 | 8 |
| E-Core Base Frequency | 1600 MHz | 2000 MHz |
| E-Core Turbo Frequency | 4000 MHz | 3500 MHz |
|
NPU
|
||
| NPU |
|
|
| NPU TOPS | — | 50 TOPS |
|
Cache and Bus
|
||
| Multiplier | Locked | Locked |
| Bus Frequency | 100 MHz | 100 MHz |
| L1 Cache | 192 KB | 80 KB |
| L2 Cache | 2.5 MB | 1 MB |
| L3 Cache | 18 MB | 16 MB |
|
Memory Support
|
||
| Memory Types: | LPDDR5X-9600 | DDR5-5600, LPDDR5X-8000 |
| Max Memory Size: | 96 GB | 256 GB |
| Memory Channels: | 2 | 2 |
| ECC Support: |
|
|
| Technologies: | N/A | AVX-512, BMI1, BMI2, F16C, SHA, XDNA2, Precision Boost 2, Precision Boost Overdrive, SMT, AMD-V, EVP, NX-Bit, SMAP, SMEP |
|
Benchmarks
|
||
|
Geekbench V6
|
||
| Multi-Core | 17924 | 13409 |
| Single-Core | 3066 | 2824 |
| File Compression | 1490 | 1090 |
| Clang Compression | 141 | 98 |
| HTML5 Browser | 477 | 284 |
| PDF Renderer | 540 | 414 |
| Text Processing | 323 | 311 |
| Background Blur | 62 | 70 |
| Photo Processing | 177 | 93 |
| Ray Tracing | 28 | 22 |
|
PassMark CPU
|
||
| Multi-Core | 39049 | 24937 |
| Single-Core | 4594 | 3839 |
| Integer Math | 90600 | 85800 |
| Floating Point | 112300 | 53200 |
| Prime Numbers | 381 | 80 |
| String Sorting | 48700 | 33200 |
| Data Encryption | 30000 | 15200 |
| Data Compression | 392300 | 304100 |
| Physics | 3460 | 1350 |
| Extended Instructions | 32900 | 21700 |
|
Cinebench 2024
|
||
| Multi-Core | 1324 | 877 |
| Single-Core | 130 | 115 |
|
Blender
|
||
| Render Score | — | 204 |
Tip: ▲ indicates a higher-is-better spec advantage, while ▼ indicates a lower-is-better advantage.
PERFORMANCE CHART COMPARISON OF Intel Core Ultra X9 388H AND AMD Ryzen AI 7 350
The charts below visualize how Intel Core Ultra X9 388H and AMD Ryzen AI 7 350 stack up in key performance metrics.
Performance Radar Chart
Performance Benchmarks
Release Timeline of Intel Core Ultra X9 388H and AMD Ryzen AI 7 350
AMD Ryzen AI 7 350 was released 11 months, 29 days earlier than Intel Core Ultra X9 388H.
Value For Money Calculator
Prices use available launch or current data. Enter your own prices to see which CPU gives better value.
Intel Core Ultra X9 388H
AMD Ryzen AI 7 350
Calculating...
Domain Score Summary
Scores are generated by Comparigon's scoring algorithm and are intended as a high-level guide. They may not map 1-to-1 with the individual spec-by-spec comparisons shown in the table.
Our Verdict
In conclusion, the Intel Core Ultra X9 388H edges out overall compared to the AMD Ryzen AI 7 350. Its strongest advantages are in Single-Core Performance, Multi-Core Performance, CPU Architecture and Energy Efficiency. The AMD Ryzen AI 7 350 is the better fit if your top priority is Memory Architecture.
Try to Compare Again One of These CPUs With Another CPU
Pick which CPU to keep, then search for the other CPU to compare.
Disclaimer: Specs, pricing, and benchmarks are sourced from official manufacturer data and verified test results. While we strive for precision, product details and pricing may change. Comparigon may earn an affiliate commission on qualifying purchases.