Intel Core Ultra X7 358H VS Apple M4 (10-Core)
We are comparing the Intel Core Ultra X7 358H (Intel) with the Apple M4 (10-Core) (Apple). Scroll down to the pros and cons of each processor, in-depth specs, and benchmark comparisons.
Overall Comparison
KEY DIFFERENCES OF Intel Core Ultra X7 358H AND Apple M4 (10-Core)
Here’s how Intel Core Ultra X7 358H and Apple M4 (10-Core) stack up against each other in their most impactful areas.
Reasons to consider the Intel Core Ultra X7 358H
-
60% more CPU threads (16 vs 10)
-
60% more CPU cores (16 vs 10)
-
100% more efficient-core threads (12 vs 6)
-
100% more efficient cores (12 vs 6)
-
4% higher Geekbench V6 multi-core score (15431 vs 14818)
-
23% higher Blender score (282 vs 230)
Reasons to consider the Apple M4 (10-Core)
-
135% higher P-core base frequency (4460 MHz vs 1900 MHz)
-
93% higher E-core base frequency (2890 MHz vs 1500 MHz)
-
37% higher Geekbench V6 single-core score (3777 vs 2763)
-
10% higher PassMark single-core score (4514 vs 4093)
-
More advanced instruction set support (ARMV9)
SPECIFICATION TABLE COMPARISON OF Intel Core Ultra X7 358H AND Apple M4 (10-Core)
Below is the detailed specification table comparing Intel Core Ultra X7 358H and Apple M4 (10-Core).
Note: Highlighted specs mean that CPU wins that spec row.
If neither side is highlighted, it is a tie or there is not enough data for both specs.
| Specification | Intel Core Ultra X7 358H | Apple M4 (10-Core) |
|---|---|---|
|
General Information
|
||
| CPU Name: | Intel Core Ultra X7 358H | Apple M4 (10-Core) |
| Vendor: | Intel | Apple |
| Release Date: | January 5, 2026 | May 7, 2024 |
| Type: | Laptop | Laptop |
| Instruction Set: | x86-64 | ARMv9 |
| Codename: | Panther Lake | Apple M4 |
|
Package and Thermals
|
||
| Manufacturing Process: | 2 nm | 3 nm |
| Transistor Count: | — | 28 billion |
| TDP (PL1): | 15-25 W | 24 W |
| Max Boost TDP (PL2): | 80 W | 40 W |
| Socket: | FCBGA2540 | Apple M-Socket |
| Max Temp (TJMax): | 100 C | 100 C |
|
CPU Cores
|
||
|
Total Cores
|
||
| Total Cores | 16 | 10 |
| Total Threads | 16 | 10 |
|
P-Cores
|
||
| P-Cores | 4 | 4 |
| P-Threads | 4 | 4 |
| P-Core Base Frequency | 1900 MHz | 4460 MHz |
| P-Core Turbo Frequency | 4800 MHz | — |
|
E-Cores
|
||
| E-Cores | 12 | 6 |
| E-Threads | 12 | 6 |
| E-Core Base Frequency | 1500 MHz | 2890 MHz |
| E-Core Turbo Frequency | 3700 MHz | — |
|
NPU
|
||
| NPU |
|
|
|
Cache and Bus
|
||
| Multiplier | Locked | Locked |
| Bus Frequency | 100 MHz | — |
| L1 Cache | 192 KB | 192 KB |
| L2 Cache | 2.5 MB | 16 MB |
| L3 Cache | 18 MB | — |
|
Memory Support
|
||
| Memory Types: | LPDDR5X-9600 | LPDDR5X-7500 |
| Max Memory Size: | 96 GB | 32 GB |
| Memory Channels: | 2 | 8 |
| Max Memory Bandwidth: | — | 120 GB/s |
| ECC Support: |
|
|
|
Benchmarks
|
||
|
Geekbench V6
|
||
| Multi-Core | 15431 | 14818 |
| Single-Core | 2763 | 3777 |
| File Compression | 1350 | 1500 |
| Clang Compression | 76 | 120 |
| HTML5 Browser | 433 | 329 |
| PDF Renderer | 447 | 362 |
| Text Processing | 289 | 352 |
| Background Blur | 66 | 70 |
| Photo Processing | 152 | 114 |
| Ray Tracing | 26 | 18 |
|
PassMark CPU
|
||
| Multi-Core | 34562 | 23685 |
| Single-Core | 4093 | 4514 |
| Integer Math | 83200 | 54400 |
| Floating Point | 105600 | 49700 |
| Prime Numbers | 350 | 265 |
| String Sorting | 41800 | 34300 |
| Data Encryption | 26700 | 15200 |
| Data Compression | 346800 | 281600 |
| Physics | 3055 | 2524 |
| Extended Instructions | 28900 | 13700 |
|
Cinebench 2024
|
||
| Multi-Core | 1142 | 982 |
| Single-Core | 125 | 172 |
|
Blender
|
||
| Render Score | 282 | 230 |
Tip: ▲ indicates a higher-is-better spec advantage, while ▼ indicates a lower-is-better advantage.
PERFORMANCE CHART COMPARISON OF Intel Core Ultra X7 358H AND Apple M4 (10-Core)
The charts below visualize how Intel Core Ultra X7 358H and Apple M4 (10-Core) stack up in key performance metrics.
Performance Radar Chart
Performance Benchmarks
Release Timeline of Intel Core Ultra X7 358H and Apple M4 (10-Core)
Apple M4 (10-Core) was released 1 year, 7 months, 29 days earlier than Intel Core Ultra X7 358H.
Value For Money Calculator
Prices use available launch or current data. Enter your own prices to see which CPU gives better value.
Intel Core Ultra X7 358H
Apple M4 (10-Core)
Calculating...
Domain Score Summary
Scores are generated by Comparigon's scoring algorithm and are intended as a high-level guide. They may not map 1-to-1 with the individual spec-by-spec comparisons shown in the table.
Our Verdict
In conclusion, the Apple M4 (10-Core) is slightly better overall compared to the Intel Core Ultra X7 358H. Its strongest advantages are in Single-Core Performance, CPU Architecture and Energy Efficiency. The Intel Core Ultra X7 358H is the better fit if your top priority is Multi-Core Performance.
Try to Compare Again One of These CPUs With Another CPU
Pick which CPU to keep, then search for the other CPU to compare.
Disclaimer: Specs, pricing, and benchmarks are sourced from official manufacturer data and verified test results. While we strive for precision, product details and pricing may change. Comparigon may earn an affiliate commission on qualifying purchases.