Intel Core Ultra X7 358H VS AMD Ryzen AI 9 465
We are comparing the Intel Core Ultra X7 358H (Intel) with the AMD Ryzen AI 9 465 (AMD). Scroll down to the pros and cons of each processor, in-depth specs, and benchmark comparisons.
Overall Comparison
KEY DIFFERENCES OF Intel Core Ultra X7 358H AND AMD Ryzen AI 9 465
Here’s how Intel Core Ultra X7 358H and AMD Ryzen AI 9 465 stack up against each other in their most impactful areas.
Reasons to consider the Intel Core Ultra X7 358H
-
60% more CPU cores (16 vs 10)
-
12% higher E-core turbo frequency (3700 MHz vs 3300 MHz)
-
100% more efficient cores (12 vs 6)
-
8% higher Geekbench V6 multi-core score (15431 vs 14227)
-
7% higher PassMark single-core score (4093 vs 3837)
-
50% smaller manufacturing process (2 nm vs 4 nm)
Reasons to consider the AMD Ryzen AI 9 465
-
25% more CPU threads (20 vs 16)
-
4% higher P-core turbo frequency (5000 MHz vs 4800 MHz)
-
100% more performance-core threads (8 vs 4)
-
5% higher P-core base frequency (2000 MHz vs 1900 MHz)
-
33% higher E-core base frequency (2000 MHz vs 1500 MHz)
-
3% higher Geekbench V6 single-core score (2853 vs 2763)
SPECIFICATION TABLE COMPARISON OF Intel Core Ultra X7 358H AND AMD Ryzen AI 9 465
Below is the detailed specification table comparing Intel Core Ultra X7 358H and AMD Ryzen AI 9 465.
Note: Highlighted specs mean that CPU wins that spec row.
If neither side is highlighted, it is a tie or there is not enough data for both specs.
| Specification | Intel Core Ultra X7 358H | AMD Ryzen AI 9 465 |
|---|---|---|
|
General Information
|
||
| CPU Name: | Intel Core Ultra X7 358H | AMD Ryzen AI 9 465 |
| Vendor: | Intel | AMD |
| Release Date: | January 5, 2026 | January 5, 2026 |
| Generation: | — | Ryzen AI 400 Series |
| Type: | Laptop | Laptop |
| Instruction Set: | x86-64 | x86-64 |
| Codename: | Panther Lake | Zen 5 (Gorgon Point) |
| Foundry: | — | TSMC |
|
Package and Thermals
|
||
| Manufacturing Process: | 2 nm | 4 nm |
| TDP (PL1): | 15-25 W | 15-54 W |
| Max Boost TDP (PL2): | 80 W | — |
| Socket: | FCBGA2540 | FP8 |
| Max Temp (TJMax): | 100 C | 100 C |
|
CPU Cores
|
||
|
Total Cores
|
||
| Total Cores | 16 | 10 |
| Total Threads | 16 | 20 |
|
P-Cores
|
||
| P-Cores | 4 | 4 |
| P-Threads | 4 | 8 |
| P-Core Base Frequency | 1900 MHz | 2000 MHz |
| P-Core Turbo Frequency | 4800 MHz | 5000 MHz |
|
E-Cores
|
||
| E-Cores | 12 | 6 |
| E-Threads | 12 | 12 |
| E-Core Base Frequency | 1500 MHz | 2000 MHz |
| E-Core Turbo Frequency | 3700 MHz | 3300 MHz |
|
NPU
|
||
| NPU |
|
|
| NPU TOPS | — | 50 TOPS |
|
Cache and Bus
|
||
| Multiplier | Locked | Locked |
| Bus Frequency | 100 MHz | 100 MHz |
| L1 Cache | 192 KB | 80 KB |
| L2 Cache | 2.5 MB | 1 MB |
| L3 Cache | 18 MB | 24 MB |
|
Memory Support
|
||
| Memory Types: | LPDDR5X-9600 | DDR5-5600, LPDDR5X-8533 |
| Max Memory Size: | 96 GB | 256 GB |
| Memory Channels: | 2 | 2 |
| Max Memory Bandwidth: | — | 89.6 GB/s |
| ECC Support: |
|
|
| Technologies: | N/A | AES, AMD-V, AVX, AVX2, AVX-512, FMA3, MMX-plus, SHA, SSE, SSE2, SSE3, SSE4.1, SSE4.2, SSE4A, SSSE3, x86-64, Precision Boost 2, Precision Boost Overdrive, SMT |
|
Benchmarks
|
||
|
Geekbench V6
|
||
| Multi-Core | 15431 | 14227 |
| Single-Core | 2763 | 2853 |
| File Compression | 1350 | 1260 |
| Clang Compression | 76 | 105 |
| HTML5 Browser | 433 | 308 |
| PDF Renderer | 447 | 432 |
| Text Processing | 289 | 310 |
| Background Blur | 66 | 59 |
| Photo Processing | 152 | 124 |
| Ray Tracing | 26 | 23 |
|
PassMark CPU
|
||
| Multi-Core | 34562 | 28892 |
| Single-Core | 4093 | 3837 |
| Integer Math | 83200 | — |
| Floating Point | 105600 | — |
| Prime Numbers | 350 | — |
| String Sorting | 41800 | — |
| Data Encryption | 26700 | — |
| Data Compression | 346800 | — |
| Physics | 3055 | — |
| Extended Instructions | 28900 | — |
|
Cinebench 2024
|
||
| Multi-Core | 1142 | 1032 |
| Single-Core | 125 | 114 |
|
Blender
|
||
| Render Score | 282 | 290 |
Tip: ▲ indicates a higher-is-better spec advantage, while ▼ indicates a lower-is-better advantage.
PERFORMANCE CHART COMPARISON OF Intel Core Ultra X7 358H AND AMD Ryzen AI 9 465
The charts below visualize how Intel Core Ultra X7 358H and AMD Ryzen AI 9 465 stack up in key performance metrics.
Performance Radar Chart
Performance Benchmarks
Release Timeline of Intel Core Ultra X7 358H and AMD Ryzen AI 9 465
Intel Core Ultra X7 358H and AMD Ryzen AI 9 465 were released on the same day.
Value For Money Calculator
Prices use available launch or current data. Enter your own prices to see which CPU gives better value.
Intel Core Ultra X7 358H
AMD Ryzen AI 9 465
Calculating...
Domain Score Summary
Scores are generated by Comparigon's scoring algorithm and are intended as a high-level guide. They may not map 1-to-1 with the individual spec-by-spec comparisons shown in the table.
Our Verdict
In conclusion, this is a close match and neither CPU clearly wins overall. Intel Core Ultra X7 358H is stronger in Multi-Core Performance and CPU Architecture. AMD Ryzen AI 9 465 is stronger in Single-Core Performance and Memory Architecture. They are about even in Energy Efficiency. Pick based on what you value most day to day.
Try to Compare Again One of These CPUs With Another CPU
Pick which CPU to keep, then search for the other CPU to compare.
Disclaimer: Specs, pricing, and benchmarks are sourced from official manufacturer data and verified test results. While we strive for precision, product details and pricing may change. Comparigon may earn an affiliate commission on qualifying purchases.