Intel Core Ultra 9 386H VS AMD Ryzen 9 9955HX
We are comparing the Intel Core Ultra 9 386H (Intel) with the AMD Ryzen 9 9955HX (AMD). Scroll down to the pros and cons of each processor, in-depth specs, and benchmark comparisons.
Overall Comparison
KEY DIFFERENCES OF Intel Core Ultra 9 386H AND AMD Ryzen 9 9955HX
Here’s how Intel Core Ultra 9 386H and AMD Ryzen 9 9955HX stack up against each other in their most impactful areas.
Reasons to consider the Intel Core Ultra 9 386H
-
50% smaller manufacturing process (2 nm vs 4 nm)
-
Faster memory type support (LPDDR5X-8533, DDR5-7200)
Reasons to consider the AMD Ryzen 9 9955HX
-
100% more CPU threads (32 vs 16)
-
10% higher P-core turbo frequency (5400 MHz vs 4900 MHz)
-
700% more performance-core threads (32 vs 4)
-
300% more performance cores (16 vs 4)
-
19% higher P-core base frequency (2500 MHz vs 2100 MHz)
-
21% higher Geekbench V6 multi-core score (19448 vs 16098)
SPECIFICATION TABLE COMPARISON OF Intel Core Ultra 9 386H AND AMD Ryzen 9 9955HX
Below is the detailed specification table comparing Intel Core Ultra 9 386H and AMD Ryzen 9 9955HX.
Note: Highlighted specs mean that CPU wins that spec row.
If neither side is highlighted, it is a tie or there is not enough data for both specs.
| Specification | Intel Core Ultra 9 386H | AMD Ryzen 9 9955HX |
|---|---|---|
|
General Information
|
||
| CPU Name: | Intel Core Ultra 9 386H | AMD Ryzen 9 9955HX |
| Vendor: | Intel | AMD |
| Release Date: | January 5, 2026 | January 7, 2025 |
| Type: | Laptop | Laptop |
| Instruction Set: | x86-64 | x86-64 |
| Codename: | Panther Lake | Zen 5 (Fire Range) |
|
Package and Thermals
|
||
| Manufacturing Process: | 2 nm | 4 nm |
| TDP (PL1): | 15-25 W | 55-75 W |
| Max Boost TDP (PL2): | 80 W | 101 W |
| Socket: | FCBGA2540 | FL1 |
| Max Temp (TJMax): | 100 C | 100 C |
|
CPU Cores
|
||
|
Total Cores
|
||
| Total Cores | 16 | 16 |
| Total Threads | 16 | 32 |
|
P-Cores
|
||
| P-Cores | 4 | 16 |
| P-Threads | 4 | 32 |
| P-Core Base Frequency | 2100 MHz | 2500 MHz |
| P-Core Turbo Frequency | 4900 MHz | 5400 MHz |
|
E-Cores
|
||
| E-Cores | 12 | — |
| E-Threads | 12 | — |
| E-Core Base Frequency | 1600 MHz | — |
| E-Core Turbo Frequency | 3900 MHz | — |
|
NPU
|
||
| NPU |
|
|
|
Cache and Bus
|
||
| Multiplier | Locked | Unlocked |
| Bus Frequency | 100 MHz | 100 MHz |
| L1 Cache | 192 KB | 80 KB |
| L2 Cache | 2.5 MB | 1 MB |
| L3 Cache | 18 MB | 64 MB |
|
Memory Support
|
||
| Memory Types: | LPDDR5X-8533, DDR5-7200 | DDR5-5600 |
| Max Memory Size: | 128 GB | 96 GB |
| Memory Channels: | 2 | 2 |
| ECC Support: |
|
|
| Technologies: | N/A | AMD EXPO, AVX-512, BMI1, BMI2, F16C, SHA, Precision Boost 2, Precision Boost OD, SMT, AMD-V, EVP, SMAP, SMEP |
|
Benchmarks
|
||
|
Geekbench V6
|
||
| Multi-Core | 16098 | 19448 |
| Single-Core | 2874 | 3273 |
| File Compression | 1420 | 1520 |
| Clang Compression | 118 | 222 |
| HTML5 Browser | 426 | 329 |
| PDF Renderer | 484 | 545 |
| Text Processing | 286 | 341 |
| Background Blur | 66 | 70 |
| Photo Processing | 158 | 123 |
| Ray Tracing | 24 | 54 |
|
PassMark CPU
|
||
| Multi-Core | — | 55805 |
| Single-Core | — | 4384 |
| Integer Math | — | 211400 |
| Floating Point | — | 135500 |
| Prime Numbers | — | 290 |
| String Sorting | — | 77000 |
| Data Encryption | — | 37000 |
| Data Compression | — | 723200 |
| Physics | — | 2739 |
| Extended Instructions | — | 57000 |
|
Cinebench 2024
|
||
| Multi-Core | 1187 | 2091 |
| Single-Core | 125 | 134 |
|
Blender
|
||
| Render Score | — | 539 |
Tip: ▲ indicates a higher-is-better spec advantage, while ▼ indicates a lower-is-better advantage.
PERFORMANCE CHART COMPARISON OF Intel Core Ultra 9 386H AND AMD Ryzen 9 9955HX
The charts below visualize how Intel Core Ultra 9 386H and AMD Ryzen 9 9955HX stack up in key performance metrics.
Performance Radar Chart
Performance Benchmarks
Release Timeline of Intel Core Ultra 9 386H and AMD Ryzen 9 9955HX
AMD Ryzen 9 9955HX was released 11 months, 29 days earlier than Intel Core Ultra 9 386H.
Value For Money Calculator
Prices use available launch or current data. Enter your own prices to see which CPU gives better value.
Intel Core Ultra 9 386H
AMD Ryzen 9 9955HX
Calculating...
Domain Score Summary
Scores are generated by Comparigon's scoring algorithm and are intended as a high-level guide. They may not map 1-to-1 with the individual spec-by-spec comparisons shown in the table.
Our Verdict
In conclusion, the AMD Ryzen 9 9955HX edges out overall compared to the Intel Core Ultra 9 386H. Its strongest advantages are in Single-Core Performance, Multi-Core Performance and Energy Efficiency. The Intel Core Ultra 9 386H is the better fit if your top priority is Memory Architecture.
Try to Compare Again One of These CPUs With Another CPU
Pick which CPU to keep, then search for the other CPU to compare.
Disclaimer: Specs, pricing, and benchmarks are sourced from official manufacturer data and verified test results. While we strive for precision, product details and pricing may change. Comparigon may earn an affiliate commission on qualifying purchases.