Intel Core Ultra 9 185H VS Intel Core Ultra 7 268V
We are comparing the Intel Core Ultra 9 185H (Intel) with the Intel Core Ultra 7 268V (Intel). Scroll down to the pros and cons of each processor, in-depth specs, and benchmark comparisons.
Overall Comparison
KEY DIFFERENCES OF Intel Core Ultra 9 185H AND Intel Core Ultra 7 268V
Here’s how Intel Core Ultra 9 185H and Intel Core Ultra 7 268V stack up against each other in their most impactful areas.
Reasons to consider the Intel Core Ultra 9 185H
-
175% more CPU threads (22 vs 8)
-
100% more CPU cores (16 vs 8)
-
2% higher P-core turbo frequency (5100 MHz vs 5000 MHz)
-
3% higher E-core turbo frequency (3800 MHz vs 3700 MHz)
-
200% more performance-core threads (12 vs 4)
-
50% more performance cores (6 vs 4)
Reasons to consider the Intel Core Ultra 7 268V
-
22% higher E-core base frequency (2200 MHz vs 1800 MHz)
-
16% higher Geekbench V6 single-core score (2828 vs 2446)
-
11% higher PassMark single-core score (4095 vs 3675)
-
57% smaller manufacturing process (3 nm vs 7 nm)
SPECIFICATION TABLE COMPARISON OF Intel Core Ultra 9 185H AND Intel Core Ultra 7 268V
Below is the detailed specification table comparing Intel Core Ultra 9 185H and Intel Core Ultra 7 268V.
Note: Highlighted specs mean that CPU wins that spec row.
If neither side is highlighted, it is a tie or there is not enough data for both specs.
| Specification | Intel Core Ultra 9 185H | Intel Core Ultra 7 268V |
|---|---|---|
|
General Information
|
||
| CPU Name: | Intel Core Ultra 9 185H | Intel Core Ultra 7 268V |
| Vendor: | Intel | Intel |
| Release Date: | December 14, 2023 | September 4, 2024 |
| Type: | Laptop | Laptop |
| Instruction Set: | x86-64 | x86-64 |
| Codename: | Meteor Lake | Lunar Lake |
|
Package and Thermals
|
||
| Manufacturing Process: | 7 nm | 3 nm |
| TDP (PL1): | 35-65 W | 17-37 W |
| Max Boost TDP (PL2): | 115 W | — |
| Socket: | FCBGA-2049 | FCBGA-2833 |
| Max Temp (TJMax): | 110 C | 100 C |
|
CPU Cores
|
||
|
Total Cores
|
||
| Total Cores | 16 | 8 |
| Total Threads | 22 | 8 |
|
P-Cores
|
||
| P-Cores | 6 | 4 |
| P-Threads | 12 | 4 |
| P-Core Base Frequency | 2300 MHz | 2200 MHz |
| P-Core Turbo Frequency | 5100 MHz | 5000 MHz |
|
E-Cores
|
||
| E-Cores | 10 | 4 |
| E-Threads | 10 | 4 |
| E-Core Base Frequency | 1800 MHz | 2200 MHz |
| E-Core Turbo Frequency | 3800 MHz | 3700 MHz |
|
NPU
|
||
| NPU |
|
|
| NPU TOPS | 11 TOPS | — |
|
Cache and Bus
|
||
| Multiplier | Locked | Locked |
| Bus Frequency | 100 MHz | 100 MHz |
| L1 Cache | 112 KB | 192 KB |
| L2 Cache | 2 MB | 2.5 MB |
| L3 Cache | 24 MB | 12 MB |
|
Memory Support
|
||
| Memory Types: | LPDDR5-7467, LPDDR5x-7467, DDR5-5600 | LPDDR5X-8533 |
| Max Memory Size: | 96 GB | 32 GB |
| Memory Channels: | 2 | 2 |
| ECC Support: |
|
|
| Technologies: | ABM, ADX, AI Boost NPU 3, BMI1, BMI2, CLMUL, DLBoost 3.0, F16C, SHA, VNNI, EIST, TBT 2.0, TBT 3.0, TSX, VT-d, VT-x, RDRAND, TXT, XD bit, vPro | ABM, ADX, AI Boost NPU 4, BMI1, BMI2, CLMUL, DLBoost 4.0, F16C, SHA, VNNI, EIST, TBT 3.0, TSX, VT-d, VT-x, RDRAND, TXT, XD bit |
|
Benchmarks
|
||
|
Geekbench V6
|
||
| Multi-Core | 13613 | 11196 |
| Single-Core | 2446 | 2828 |
| File Compression | 1270 | 1030 |
| Clang Compression | 103 | 69 |
| HTML5 Browser | 343 | 274 |
| PDF Renderer | 390 | 289 |
| Text Processing | 245 | 308 |
| Background Blur | 45 | 51 |
| Photo Processing | 132 | 117 |
| Ray Tracing | 23 | 14 |
|
PassMark CPU
|
||
| Multi-Core | 29193 | 19532 |
| Single-Core | 3675 | 4095 |
| Integer Math | 97900 | — |
| Floating Point | 72700 | — |
| Prime Numbers | 123 | — |
| String Sorting | 39300 | — |
| Data Encryption | 19700 | — |
| Data Compression | 337200 | — |
| Physics | 1949 | — |
| Extended Instructions | 20100 | — |
|
Cinebench 2024
|
||
| Multi-Core | 987 | 636 |
| Single-Core | 107 | 127 |
|
Blender
|
||
| Render Score | 200 | 116 |
Tip: ▲ indicates a higher-is-better spec advantage, while ▼ indicates a lower-is-better advantage.
PERFORMANCE CHART COMPARISON OF Intel Core Ultra 9 185H AND Intel Core Ultra 7 268V
The charts below visualize how Intel Core Ultra 9 185H and Intel Core Ultra 7 268V stack up in key performance metrics.
Performance Radar Chart
Performance Benchmarks
Release Timeline of Intel Core Ultra 9 185H and Intel Core Ultra 7 268V
Intel Core Ultra 9 185H was released 8 months, 21 days earlier than Intel Core Ultra 7 268V.
Value For Money Calculator
Prices use available launch or current data. Enter your own prices to see which CPU gives better value.
Intel Core Ultra 9 185H
Intel Core Ultra 7 268V
Calculating...
Domain Score Summary
Scores are generated by Comparigon's scoring algorithm and are intended as a high-level guide. They may not map 1-to-1 with the individual spec-by-spec comparisons shown in the table.
Our Verdict
In conclusion, the Intel Core Ultra 9 185H has a narrow overall lead compared to the Intel Core Ultra 7 268V. Its strongest advantages are in Multi-Core Performance and Memory Architecture. The Intel Core Ultra 7 268V is the better fit if your top priority is Single-Core Performance and Energy Efficiency.
Try to Compare Again One of These CPUs With Another CPU
Pick which CPU to keep, then search for the other CPU to compare.
Disclaimer: Specs, pricing, and benchmarks are sourced from official manufacturer data and verified test results. While we strive for precision, product details and pricing may change. Comparigon may earn an affiliate commission on qualifying purchases.