Intel Core Ultra 9 185H VS Intel Core Ultra 7 155H
We are comparing the Intel Core Ultra 9 185H ( Intel ) head-to-head with the Intel Core Ultra 7 155H ( Intel ) . You will get the key pros and cons of each processor, in-depth specs, and benchmark comparisons.
Note: This comparison of Intel Core Ultra 9 185H vs. Intel Core Ultra 7 155H is based on Comparigon's analysis and is for informational purposes only.
Overall Comparison
KEY DIFFERENCES OF Intel Core Ultra 9 185H AND Intel Core Ultra 7 155H
Here’s how Intel Core Ultra 9 185H and Intel Core Ultra 7 155H stack up against each other in their most impactful areas. Use these bullets to quickly see where each CPU leads.
Why Intel Core Ultra 9 185H is the best choice:
-
6% higher P-core turbo frequency (5100 MHz vs 4800 MHz)
-
64% higher P-core base frequency (2300 MHz vs 1400 MHz)
-
100% higher E-core base frequency (1800 MHz vs 900 MHz)
-
9% higher Geekbench V6 multi-core score (13613 vs 12515)
-
7% higher PassMark single-core score (3675 vs 3426)
-
16% higher Blender score (200 vs 172)
SPECIFICATION TABLE COMPARISON OF Intel Core Ultra 9 185H AND Intel Core Ultra 7 155H
Below is the detailed specification table comparing Intel Core Ultra 9 185H and Intel Core Ultra 7 155H.
Note: Highlighted specs mean that CPU wins that spec row.
If neither side is highlighted, it is a tie or there is not enough data for both specs.
| Specification | Intel Core Ultra 9 185H | Intel Core Ultra 7 155H |
|---|---|---|
|
General Information
|
||
| CPU Name: | Intel Core Ultra 9 185H | Intel Core Ultra 7 155H |
| Vendor: | Intel | Intel |
| Release Date: | December 14, 2023 | December 14, 2023 |
| Type: | Laptop | Laptop |
| Instruction Set: | x86-64 | x86-64 |
| Codename: | Meteor Lake | Meteor Lake |
|
Package and Thermals
|
||
| Manufacturing Process: | 7 nm | 7 nm |
| TDP (PL1): | 35-65 W | 20-65 W |
| Max Boost TDP (PL2): | 115 W | 115 W |
| Socket: | FCBGA-2049 | FCBGA-2049 |
| Max Temp (TJMax): | 110 C | 110 C |
|
CPU Cores
|
||
|
Total Cores
|
||
| Total Cores | 16 | 16 |
| Total Threads | 22 | 22 |
|
P-Cores
|
||
| P-Cores | 6 | 6 |
| P-Threads | 12 | 12 |
| P-Core Base Frequency | 2300 MHz | 1400 MHz |
| P-Core Turbo Frequency | 5100 MHz | 4800 MHz |
|
E-Cores
|
||
| E-Cores | 10 | 10 |
| E-Threads | 10 | 10 |
| E-Core Base Frequency | 1800 MHz | 900 MHz |
| E-Core Turbo Frequency | 3800 MHz | 3800 MHz |
|
NPU
|
||
| NPU |
|
|
| NPU TOPS | 11 TOPS | 11 TOPS |
|
Cache and Bus
|
||
| Multiplier | Locked | Locked |
| Bus Frequency | 100 MHz | 100 MHz |
| L1 Cache | 112 KB | 112 KB |
| L2 Cache | 2 MB | 2 MB |
| L3 Cache | 24 MB | 24 MB |
|
Memory Support
|
||
| Memory Types: | LPDDR5-7467, LPDDR5x-7467, DDR5-5600 | LPDDR5-7467, LPDDR5x-7467, DDR5-5600 |
| Max Memory Size: | 96 GB | 96 GB |
| Memory Channels: | 2 | 2 |
| ECC Support: |
|
|
| Technologies: | ABM, ADX, AI Boost NPU 3, BMI1, BMI2, CLMUL, DLBoost 3.0, F16C, SHA, VNNI, EIST, TBT 2.0, TBT 3.0, TSX, VT-d, VT-x, RDRAND, TXT, XD bit, vPro | ABM, ADX, AI Boost NPU 3, BMI1, BMI2, CLMUL, DLBoost 3.0, F16C, SHA, VNNI, EIST, TBT 2.0, TBT 3.0, TSX, VT-d, VT-x, RDRAND, TXT, XD bit, vPro |
|
Benchmarks
|
||
|
Geekbench V6
|
||
| Multi-Core | 13613 | 12515 |
| Single-Core | 2446 | 2421 |
| File Compression | 1270 | 1220 |
| Clang Compression | 103 | 101 |
| HTML5 Browser | 343 | 271 |
| PDF Renderer | 390 | 356 |
| Text Processing | 245 | 243 |
| Background Blur | 45 | 49 |
| Photo Processing | 132 | 117 |
| Ray Tracing | 23 | 19 |
|
PassMark CPU
|
||
| CPU Mark | 29193 | 24604 |
| Single-Core | 3675 | 3426 |
| Integer Math | 97900 | 86100 |
| Floating Point | 72700 | 62900 |
| Prime Numbers | 123 | 113 |
| String Sorting | 39300 | 31700 |
| Data Encryption | 19700 | 16200 |
| Data Compression | 337200 | 274500 |
| Physics | 1949 | 1708 |
| Extended Instructions | 20100 | 16300 |
|
Cinebench 2024
|
||
| Multi-Core | 987 | 957 |
| Single-Core | 107 | 99 |
|
Blender
|
||
| Render Score | 200 | 172 |
Tip: ▲ indicates a higher-is-better spec advantage, while ▼ indicates a lower-is-better advantage.
PERFORMANCE CHART COMPARISON OF Intel Core Ultra 9 185H AND Intel Core Ultra 7 155H
The charts below visualize how Intel Core Ultra 9 185H and Intel Core Ultra 7 155H stack up in key performance metrics.
Performance Radar Chart
Performance Benchmarks
Release Timeline of Intel Core Ultra 9 185H and Intel Core Ultra 7 155H
Intel Core Ultra 9 185H and Intel Core Ultra 7 155H were released on the same day.
Value For Money Calculator
Prices use available launch or current data. Enter your own prices to see which CPU gives better value.
Intel Core Ultra 9 185H
Intel Core Ultra 7 155H
Calculating...
Domain Score Summary
Note: Scores (0 to 100) are generated by Comparigon’s scoring algorithm and are intended as a high-level guide. They may not map 1-to-1 with the individual spec-by-spec comparisons shown in the table.
Our Verdict
In conclusion, the Intel Core Ultra 9 185H has a narrow overall lead compared to the Intel Core Ultra 7 155H. Its strongest advantages are in Single-Core Performance, Multi-Core Performance, CPU Architecture and Energy Efficiency. They are still fairly close in Memory Architecture.
Try to Compare Again One of These CPUs With Another CPU
Pick which CPU to keep, then search for the other CPU to compare.