Intel Core Ultra 7 265 VS Intel Core i7 13700K
We are comparing the Intel Core Ultra 7 265 (Intel) with the Intel Core i7 13700K (Intel). Scroll down to the pros and cons of each processor, in-depth specs, and benchmark comparisons.
Overall Comparison
KEY DIFFERENCES OF Intel Core Ultra 7 265 AND Intel Core i7 13700K
Here’s how Intel Core Ultra 7 265 and Intel Core i7 13700K stack up against each other in their most impactful areas.
Reasons to consider the Intel Core Ultra 7 265
-
25% more CPU cores (20 vs 16)
-
10% higher E-core turbo frequency (4600 MHz vs 4200 MHz)
-
50% more efficient-core threads (12 vs 8)
-
50% more efficient cores (12 vs 8)
-
8% higher PassMark single-core score (4694 vs 4328)
-
70% smaller manufacturing process (3 nm vs 10 nm)
Reasons to consider the Intel Core i7 13700K
-
20% more CPU threads (24 vs 20)
-
100% more performance-core threads (16 vs 8)
-
42% higher P-core base frequency (3400 MHz vs 2400 MHz)
-
39% higher E-core base frequency (2500 MHz vs 1800 MHz)
-
7% higher Geekbench V6 multi-core score (20193 vs 18843)
-
18% higher Blender score (402 vs 340)
SPECIFICATION TABLE COMPARISON OF Intel Core Ultra 7 265 AND Intel Core i7 13700K
Below is the detailed specification table comparing Intel Core Ultra 7 265 and Intel Core i7 13700K.
Note: Highlighted specs mean that CPU wins that spec row.
If neither side is highlighted, it is a tie or there is not enough data for both specs.
| Specification | Intel Core Ultra 7 265 | Intel Core i7 13700K |
|---|---|---|
|
General Information
|
||
| CPU Name: | Intel Core Ultra 7 265 | Intel Core i7 13700K |
| Vendor: | Intel | Intel |
| Release Date: | December 18, 2024 | September 27, 2022 |
| Type: | Desktop | Desktop |
| Instruction Set: | x86-64 | x86-64 |
| Codename: | Arrow Lake | Raptor Lake |
|
Package and Thermals
|
||
| Manufacturing Process: | 3 nm | 10 nm |
| TDP (PL1): | 65 W | 125 W |
| Max Boost TDP (PL2): | 182 W | 253 W |
| Socket: | FCLGA-1851 | LGA-1700 |
| Max Temp (TJMax): | 105 C | 100 C |
|
CPU Cores
|
||
|
Total Cores
|
||
| Total Cores | 20 | 16 |
| Total Threads | 20 | 24 |
|
P-Cores
|
||
| P-Cores | 8 | 8 |
| P-Threads | 8 | 16 |
| P-Core Base Frequency | 2400 MHz | 3400 MHz |
| P-Core Turbo Frequency | 5300 MHz | 5300 MHz |
|
E-Cores
|
||
| E-Cores | 12 | 8 |
| E-Threads | 12 | 8 |
| E-Core Base Frequency | 1800 MHz | 2500 MHz |
| E-Core Turbo Frequency | 4600 MHz | 4200 MHz |
|
NPU
|
||
| NPU |
|
|
|
Cache and Bus
|
||
| Multiplier | Locked | Unlocked |
| Bus Frequency | 100 MHz | 100 MHz |
| L1 Cache | 192 KB | 80 KB |
| L2 Cache | 3 MB | 2 MB |
| L3 Cache | 30 MB | 30 MB |
|
Memory Support
|
||
| Memory Types: | DDR5-6400 | DDR5-5600, DDR4-3200 |
| Max Memory Size: | 256 GB | 192 GB |
| Memory Channels: | 2 | 2 |
| Max Memory Bandwidth: | — | 89.6 GB/s |
| ECC Support: |
|
|
| Technologies: | ABM, ADX, AVX-VNNI, BMI1, BMI2, CLMUL, DLBoost 3.0, F16C, SHA, CFET, EIST, TBMT 3.0, TBT 2.0, Thread Director, VT-d, VT-rp, VT-x, MBEC, RDRAND, SIPP, TDT, TXT, XD bit, vPro | ABM, ADX, BMI1, BMI2, CLMUL, F16C, SHA, EIST, TBT 2.0, TBT 3.0, TSX, VT-d, VT-x, RDRAND, TXT, XD bit |
|
Benchmarks
|
||
|
Geekbench V6
|
||
| Multi-Core | 18843 | 20193 |
| Single-Core | 2910 | 2941 |
| File Compression | 1340 | 1770 |
| Clang Compression | 189 | 168 |
| HTML5 Browser | 379 | 528 |
| PDF Renderer | 526 | 560 |
| Text Processing | 327 | 288 |
| Background Blur | 79 | 81 |
| Photo Processing | 139 | 188 |
| Ray Tracing | 42 | 38 |
|
PassMark CPU
|
||
| Multi-Core | 49808 | 45724 |
| Single-Core | 4694 | 4328 |
| Integer Math | — | 154000 |
| Floating Point | — | 114500 |
| Prime Numbers | — | 189 |
| String Sorting | — | 62600 |
| Data Encryption | — | 33100 |
| Data Compression | — | 592800 |
| Physics | — | 2703 |
| Extended Instructions | — | 36500 |
|
Cinebench 2024
|
||
| Multi-Core | 1398 | 1521 |
| Single-Core | 131 | 121 |
|
Blender
|
||
| Render Score | 340 | 402 |
Tip: ▲ indicates a higher-is-better spec advantage, while ▼ indicates a lower-is-better advantage.
PERFORMANCE CHART COMPARISON OF Intel Core Ultra 7 265 AND Intel Core i7 13700K
The charts below visualize how Intel Core Ultra 7 265 and Intel Core i7 13700K stack up in key performance metrics.
Performance Radar Chart
Performance Benchmarks
Release Timeline of Intel Core Ultra 7 265 and Intel Core i7 13700K
Intel Core i7 13700K was released 2 years, 2 months, 21 days earlier than Intel Core Ultra 7 265.
Value For Money Calculator
Prices use available launch or current data. Enter your own prices to see which CPU gives better value.
Intel Core Ultra 7 265
Intel Core i7 13700K
Calculating...
Domain Score Summary
Scores are generated by Comparigon's scoring algorithm and are intended as a high-level guide. They may not map 1-to-1 with the individual spec-by-spec comparisons shown in the table.
Our Verdict
In conclusion, the Intel Core Ultra 7 265 has a narrow overall lead compared to the Intel Core i7 13700K. Its strongest advantages are in Single-Core Performance, CPU Architecture, Memory Architecture and Energy Efficiency. The Intel Core i7 13700K is the better fit if your top priority is Multi-Core Performance.
Try to Compare Again One of These CPUs With Another CPU
Pick which CPU to keep, then search for the other CPU to compare.
Disclaimer: Specs, pricing, and benchmarks are sourced from official manufacturer data and verified test results. While we strive for precision, product details and pricing may change. Comparigon may earn an affiliate commission on qualifying purchases.