Apple M5 Pro (15-Core) VS Intel Core Ultra 9 275HX
We are comparing the Apple M5 Pro (15-Core) (Apple) with the Intel Core Ultra 9 275HX (Intel). Scroll down to the pros and cons of each processor, in-depth specs, and benchmark comparisons.
Overall Comparison
KEY DIFFERENCES OF Apple M5 Pro (15-Core) AND Intel Core Ultra 9 275HX
Here’s how Apple M5 Pro (15-Core) and Intel Core Ultra 9 275HX stack up against each other in their most impactful areas.
Reasons to consider the Apple M5 Pro (15-Core)
-
71% higher P-core base frequency (4610 MHz vs 2700 MHz)
-
109% higher E-core base frequency (4380 MHz vs 2100 MHz)
-
27% higher Geekbench V6 multi-core score (25906 vs 20451)
-
42% higher Geekbench V6 single-core score (4254 vs 3001)
-
25% higher PassMark single-core score (5901 vs 4733)
-
More advanced instruction set support (ARMV9)
Reasons to consider the Intel Core Ultra 9 275HX
-
60% more CPU threads (24 vs 15)
-
60% more CPU cores (24 vs 15)
-
60% more performance-core threads (8 vs 5)
-
60% more performance cores (8 vs 5)
-
60% more efficient-core threads (16 vs 10)
-
60% more efficient cores (16 vs 10)
SPECIFICATION TABLE COMPARISON OF Apple M5 Pro (15-Core) AND Intel Core Ultra 9 275HX
Below is the detailed specification table comparing Apple M5 Pro (15-Core) and Intel Core Ultra 9 275HX.
Note: Highlighted specs mean that CPU wins that spec row.
If neither side is highlighted, it is a tie or there is not enough data for both specs.
| Specification | Apple M5 Pro (15-Core) | Intel Core Ultra 9 275HX |
|---|---|---|
|
General Information
|
||
| CPU Name: | Apple M5 Pro (15-Core) | Intel Core Ultra 9 275HX |
| Vendor: | Apple | Intel |
| Release Date: | March 3, 2026 | January 6, 2025 |
| Generation: | — | Core Ultra (Series 2) |
| Type: | Laptop | Laptop |
| Instruction Set: | ARMv9 | x86-64 |
| Codename: | Apple M5 | Arrow Lake |
| Foundry: | — | TSMC |
|
Package and Thermals
|
||
| Manufacturing Process: | 3 nm | 3 nm |
| Transistor Count: | 28 billion | — |
| TDP (PL1): | — | 55 W |
| Max Boost TDP (PL2): | — | 160 W |
| Socket: | Apple M-Socket | FCBGA-2114 |
| Max Temp (TJMax): | 100 C | 105 C |
|
CPU Cores
|
||
|
Total Cores
|
||
| Total Cores | 15 | 24 |
| Total Threads | 15 | 24 |
|
P-Cores
|
||
| P-Cores | 5 | 8 |
| P-Threads | 5 | 8 |
| P-Core Base Frequency | 4610 MHz | 2700 MHz |
| P-Core Turbo Frequency | — | 5400 MHz |
|
E-Cores
|
||
| E-Cores | 10 | 16 |
| E-Threads | 10 | 16 |
| E-Core Base Frequency | 4380 MHz | 2100 MHz |
| E-Core Turbo Frequency | — | 4600 MHz |
|
NPU
|
||
| NPU |
|
|
| NPU TOPS | — | 13 TOPS |
|
Cache and Bus
|
||
| Multiplier | Locked | Unlocked |
| Bus Frequency | — | 100 MHz |
| L1 Cache | 192 KB | 192 KB |
| L2 Cache | — | 2 MB |
| L3 Cache | — | 36 MB |
|
Memory Support
|
||
| Memory Types: | LPDDR5X-9600 | DDR5-6400 |
| Max Memory Size: | 64 GB | 256 GB |
| Memory Channels: | 4 | 2 |
| Max Memory Bandwidth: | 307 GB/s | — |
| ECC Support: |
|
|
| Technologies: | N/A | Intel AI Boost, DL Boost, Thread Director, Speed Shift, Turbo Boost Max 3.0, Turbo Boost 2.0, SSE4.1, SSE4.2, AVX2, VT-d, VT-x, VT-x EPT, AES-NI, TXT, Control-Flow Enforcement |
|
Benchmarks
|
||
|
Geekbench V6
|
||
| Multi-Core | 25906 | 20451 |
| Single-Core | 4254 | 3001 |
| File Compression | 2370 | 1480 |
| Clang Compression | 222 | 216 |
| HTML5 Browser | 673 | 436 |
| PDF Renderer | 667 | 546 |
| Text Processing | 437 | 345 |
| Background Blur | 99 | 79 |
| Photo Processing | 239 | 156 |
| Ray Tracing | 40 | 46 |
|
PassMark CPU
|
||
| Multi-Core | 49402 | 55998 |
| Single-Core | 5901 | 4733 |
| Integer Math | 111700 | — |
| Floating Point | 158500 | — |
| Prime Numbers | 479 | — |
| String Sorting | 71800 | — |
| Data Encryption | 34100 | — |
| Data Compression | 593700 | — |
| Physics | 5502 | — |
| Extended Instructions | 27300 | — |
|
Cinebench 2024
|
||
| Multi-Core | 1982 | 1944 |
| Single-Core | 208 | 129 |
|
Blender
|
||
| Render Score | — | 360 |
Tip: ▲ indicates a higher-is-better spec advantage, while ▼ indicates a lower-is-better advantage.
PERFORMANCE CHART COMPARISON OF Apple M5 Pro (15-Core) AND Intel Core Ultra 9 275HX
The charts below visualize how Apple M5 Pro (15-Core) and Intel Core Ultra 9 275HX stack up in key performance metrics.
Performance Radar Chart
Performance Benchmarks
Release Timeline of Apple M5 Pro (15-Core) and Intel Core Ultra 9 275HX
Intel Core Ultra 9 275HX was released 1 year, 1 month, 25 days earlier than Apple M5 Pro (15-Core).
Value For Money Calculator
Prices use available launch or current data. Enter your own prices to see which CPU gives better value.
Apple M5 Pro (15-Core)
Intel Core Ultra 9 275HX
Calculating...
Domain Score Summary
Scores are generated by Comparigon's scoring algorithm and are intended as a high-level guide. They may not map 1-to-1 with the individual spec-by-spec comparisons shown in the table.
Our Verdict
In conclusion, the Apple M5 Pro (15-Core) is slightly better overall compared to the Intel Core Ultra 9 275HX. Its strongest advantages are in Single-Core Performance, CPU Architecture and Energy Efficiency. The Intel Core Ultra 9 275HX is the better fit if your top priority is Memory Architecture.
Try to Compare Again One of These CPUs With Another CPU
Pick which CPU to keep, then search for the other CPU to compare.
Disclaimer: Specs, pricing, and benchmarks are sourced from official manufacturer data and verified test results. While we strive for precision, product details and pricing may change. Comparigon may earn an affiliate commission on qualifying purchases.