Apple M5 (10-Core) VS Intel Core Ultra 7 265H
We are comparing the Apple M5 (10-Core) (Apple) with the Intel Core Ultra 7 265H (Intel). Scroll down to the pros and cons of each processor, in-depth specs, and benchmark comparisons.
Overall Comparison
KEY DIFFERENCES OF Apple M5 (10-Core) AND Intel Core Ultra 7 265H
Here’s how Apple M5 (10-Core) and Intel Core Ultra 7 265H stack up against each other in their most impactful areas.
Reasons to consider the Apple M5 (10-Core)
-
110% higher P-core base frequency (4610 MHz vs 2200 MHz)
-
76% higher E-core base frequency (3000 MHz vs 1700 MHz)
-
12% higher Geekbench V6 multi-core score (17862 vs 16018)
-
48% higher Geekbench V6 single-core score (4276 vs 2895)
-
33% higher PassMark single-core score (5803 vs 4352)
-
17% higher Blender score (276 vs 236)
Reasons to consider the Intel Core Ultra 7 265H
-
60% more CPU threads (16 vs 10)
-
60% more CPU cores (16 vs 10)
-
50% more performance-core threads (6 vs 4)
-
50% more performance cores (6 vs 4)
-
67% more efficient-core threads (10 vs 6)
-
67% more efficient cores (10 vs 6)
SPECIFICATION TABLE COMPARISON OF Apple M5 (10-Core) AND Intel Core Ultra 7 265H
Below is the detailed specification table comparing Apple M5 (10-Core) and Intel Core Ultra 7 265H.
Note: Highlighted specs mean that CPU wins that spec row.
If neither side is highlighted, it is a tie or there is not enough data for both specs.
| Specification | Apple M5 (10-Core) | Intel Core Ultra 7 265H |
|---|---|---|
|
General Information
|
||
| CPU Name: | Apple M5 (10-Core) | Intel Core Ultra 7 265H |
| Vendor: | Apple | Intel |
| Release Date: | October 15, 2025 | January 6, 2025 |
| Type: | Laptop | Laptop |
| Instruction Set: | ARMv9 | x86-64 |
| Codename: | Apple M5 | Arrow Lake |
|
Package and Thermals
|
||
| Manufacturing Process: | 3 nm | 3 nm |
| Transistor Count: | 28 billion | — |
| TDP (PL1): | 27 W | 28 W |
| Max Boost TDP (PL2): | — | 115 W |
| Socket: | Apple M-Socket | FCBGA-2049 |
| Max Temp (TJMax): | 100 C | 110 C |
|
CPU Cores
|
||
|
Total Cores
|
||
| Total Cores | 10 | 16 |
| Total Threads | 10 | 16 |
|
P-Cores
|
||
| P-Cores | 4 | 6 |
| P-Threads | 4 | 6 |
| P-Core Base Frequency | 4610 MHz | 2200 MHz |
| P-Core Turbo Frequency | — | 5300 MHz |
|
E-Cores
|
||
| E-Cores | 6 | 10 |
| E-Threads | 6 | 10 |
| E-Core Base Frequency | 3000 MHz | 1700 MHz |
| E-Core Turbo Frequency | — | 4500 MHz |
|
NPU
|
||
| NPU |
|
|
|
Cache and Bus
|
||
| Multiplier | Locked | Locked |
| Bus Frequency | — | 100 MHz |
| L1 Cache | 192 KB | 192 KB |
| L2 Cache | 16 MB | 2 MB |
| L3 Cache | — | 24 MB |
|
Memory Support
|
||
| Memory Types: | LPDDR5X-9600 | LPDDR5-8400, LPDDR5x-8400, DDR5-6400 |
| Max Memory Size: | 32 GB | 128 GB |
| Memory Channels: | 8 | 2 |
| Max Memory Bandwidth: | 153 GB/s | — |
| ECC Support: |
|
|
|
Benchmarks
|
||
|
Geekbench V6
|
||
| Multi-Core | 17862 | 16018 |
| Single-Core | 4276 | 2895 |
| File Compression | 1790 | 1310 |
| Clang Compression | 138 | 123 |
| HTML5 Browser | 427 | 406 |
| PDF Renderer | 431 | 468 |
| Text Processing | 421 | 325 |
| Background Blur | 79 | 67 |
| Photo Processing | 156 | 151 |
| Ray Tracing | 22 | 24 |
|
PassMark CPU
|
||
| Multi-Core | 27718 | 34309 |
| Single-Core | 5803 | 4352 |
| Integer Math | 57400 | — |
| Floating Point | 78200 | — |
| Prime Numbers | 335 | — |
| String Sorting | 36400 | — |
| Data Encryption | 17300 | — |
| Data Compression | 313000 | — |
| Physics | 3338 | — |
| Extended Instructions | 16100 | — |
|
Cinebench 2024
|
||
| Multi-Core | 1183 | 1150 |
| Single-Core | 208 | 125 |
|
Blender
|
||
| Render Score | 276 | 236 |
Tip: ▲ indicates a higher-is-better spec advantage, while ▼ indicates a lower-is-better advantage.
PERFORMANCE CHART COMPARISON OF Apple M5 (10-Core) AND Intel Core Ultra 7 265H
The charts below visualize how Apple M5 (10-Core) and Intel Core Ultra 7 265H stack up in key performance metrics.
Performance Radar Chart
Performance Benchmarks
Release Timeline of Apple M5 (10-Core) and Intel Core Ultra 7 265H
Intel Core Ultra 7 265H was released 9 months, 9 days earlier than Apple M5 (10-Core).
Value For Money Calculator
Prices use available launch or current data. Enter your own prices to see which CPU gives better value.
Apple M5 (10-Core)
Intel Core Ultra 7 265H
Calculating...
Domain Score Summary
Scores are generated by Comparigon's scoring algorithm and are intended as a high-level guide. They may not map 1-to-1 with the individual spec-by-spec comparisons shown in the table.
Our Verdict
In conclusion, the Apple M5 (10-Core) is slightly better overall compared to the Intel Core Ultra 7 265H. Its strongest advantages are in Single-Core Performance, CPU Architecture and Energy Efficiency. The Intel Core Ultra 7 265H is the better fit if your top priority is Multi-Core Performance.
Try to Compare Again One of These CPUs With Another CPU
Pick which CPU to keep, then search for the other CPU to compare.
Disclaimer: Specs, pricing, and benchmarks are sourced from official manufacturer data and verified test results. While we strive for precision, product details and pricing may change. Comparigon may earn an affiliate commission on qualifying purchases.