AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 470 VS Intel Core Ultra 5 226V
We are comparing the AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 470 (AMD) with the Intel Core Ultra 5 226V (Intel). Scroll down to the pros and cons of each processor, in-depth specs, and benchmark comparisons.
Overall Comparison
KEY DIFFERENCES OF AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 470 AND Intel Core Ultra 5 226V
Here’s how AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 470 and Intel Core Ultra 5 226V stack up against each other in their most impactful areas.
Reasons to consider the AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 470
-
200% more CPU threads (24 vs 8)
-
50% more CPU cores (12 vs 8)
-
16% higher P-core turbo frequency (5200 MHz vs 4500 MHz)
-
100% more performance-core threads (8 vs 4)
-
300% more efficient-core threads (16 vs 4)
-
100% more efficient cores (8 vs 4)
Reasons to consider the Intel Core Ultra 5 226V
-
6% higher E-core turbo frequency (3500 MHz vs 3300 MHz)
-
5% higher P-core base frequency (2100 MHz vs 2000 MHz)
-
5% higher E-core base frequency (2100 MHz vs 2000 MHz)
-
25% smaller manufacturing process (3 nm vs 4 nm)
SPECIFICATION TABLE COMPARISON OF AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 470 AND Intel Core Ultra 5 226V
Below is the detailed specification table comparing AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 470 and Intel Core Ultra 5 226V.
Note: Highlighted specs mean that CPU wins that spec row.
If neither side is highlighted, it is a tie or there is not enough data for both specs.
| Specification | AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 470 | Intel Core Ultra 5 226V |
|---|---|---|
|
General Information
|
||
| CPU Name: | AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 470 | Intel Core Ultra 5 226V |
| Vendor: | AMD | Intel |
| Release Date: | January 5, 2026 | September 4, 2024 |
| Generation: | Ryzen AI 400 Series | — |
| Type: | Laptop | Laptop |
| Instruction Set: | x86-64 | x86-64 |
| Codename: | Zen 5 (Gorgon Point) | Lunar Lake |
| Foundry: | TSMC | — |
|
Package and Thermals
|
||
| Manufacturing Process: | 4 nm | 3 nm |
| TDP (PL1): | 15-54 W | 17-37 W |
| Max Boost TDP (PL2): | — | 37 W |
| Socket: | FP8 | FCBGA-2833 |
| Max Temp (TJMax): | 100 C | 100 C |
|
CPU Cores
|
||
|
Total Cores
|
||
| Total Cores | 12 | 8 |
| Total Threads | 24 | 8 |
|
P-Cores
|
||
| P-Cores | 4 | 4 |
| P-Threads | 8 | 4 |
| P-Core Base Frequency | 2000 MHz | 2100 MHz |
| P-Core Turbo Frequency | 5200 MHz | 4500 MHz |
|
E-Cores
|
||
| E-Cores | 8 | 4 |
| E-Threads | 16 | 4 |
| E-Core Base Frequency | 2000 MHz | 2100 MHz |
| E-Core Turbo Frequency | 3300 MHz | 3500 MHz |
|
NPU
|
||
| NPU |
|
|
| NPU TOPS | 50 TOPS | — |
|
Cache and Bus
|
||
| Multiplier | Locked | Locked |
| Bus Frequency | 100 MHz | 100 MHz |
| L1 Cache | 80 KB | 192 KB |
| L2 Cache | 1 MB | 2.5 MB |
| L3 Cache | 24 MB | 8 MB |
|
Memory Support
|
||
| Memory Types: | DDR5-5600, LPDDR5X-8533 | LPDDR5X-8533 |
| Max Memory Size: | 256 GB | 16 GB |
| Memory Channels: | 2 | 2 |
| Max Memory Bandwidth: | 89.6 GB/s | — |
| ECC Support: |
|
|
| Technologies: | AES, AMD-V, AVX, AVX2, AVX-512, FMA3, MMX-plus, SHA, SSE, SSE2, SSE3, SSE4.1, SSE4.2, SSE4A, SSSE3, x86-64, AMD EXPO, Precision Boost 2, Precision Boost Overdrive, SMT | ABM, ADX, AI Boost NPU 4, BMI1, BMI2, CLMUL, DLBoost 4.0, F16C, SHA, VNNI, EIST, TBT 2.0, TSX, VT-d, VT-x, RDRAND, TXT, XD bit |
|
Benchmarks
|
||
|
Geekbench V6
|
||
| Multi-Core | 16022 | 9636 |
| Single-Core | 2968 | 2516 |
| File Compression | 1330 | 906 |
| Clang Compression | 132 | 58 |
| HTML5 Browser | 344 | 254 |
| PDF Renderer | 503 | 269 |
| Text Processing | 310 | 278 |
| Background Blur | 65 | 47 |
| Photo Processing | 141 | 105 |
| Ray Tracing | 31 | 7 |
|
PassMark CPU
|
||
| Multi-Core | 37902 | 18070 |
| Single-Core | 4191 | 3819 |
| Integer Math | 132300 | 39100 |
| Floating Point | 82600 | 52900 |
| Prime Numbers | 133 | 167 |
| String Sorting | 52600 | 21100 |
| Data Encryption | 24200 | 12900 |
| Data Compression | 491400 | 172700 |
| Physics | 1978 | 1464 |
| Extended Instructions | 34800 | 14900 |
|
Cinebench 2024
|
||
| Multi-Core | 1247 | 512 |
| Single-Core | 122 | 100 |
|
Blender
|
||
| Render Score | 217 | — |
Tip: ▲ indicates a higher-is-better spec advantage, while ▼ indicates a lower-is-better advantage.
PERFORMANCE CHART COMPARISON OF AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 470 AND Intel Core Ultra 5 226V
The charts below visualize how AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 470 and Intel Core Ultra 5 226V stack up in key performance metrics.
Performance Radar Chart
Performance Benchmarks
Release Timeline of AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 470 and Intel Core Ultra 5 226V
Intel Core Ultra 5 226V was released 1 year, 4 months, 1 day earlier than AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 470.
Value For Money Calculator
Prices use available launch or current data. Enter your own prices to see which CPU gives better value.
AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 470
Intel Core Ultra 5 226V
Calculating...
Domain Score Summary
Scores are generated by Comparigon's scoring algorithm and are intended as a high-level guide. They may not map 1-to-1 with the individual spec-by-spec comparisons shown in the table.
Our Verdict
In conclusion, the AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 470 is slightly better overall compared to the Intel Core Ultra 5 226V. It comes out ahead across every comparable key area.
Try to Compare Again One of These CPUs With Another CPU
Pick which CPU to keep, then search for the other CPU to compare.
Disclaimer: Specs, pricing, and benchmarks are sourced from official manufacturer data and verified test results. While we strive for precision, product details and pricing may change. Comparigon may earn an affiliate commission on qualifying purchases.