AMD Ryzen AI 9 365 VS Intel Core Ultra 9 185H
We are comparing the AMD Ryzen AI 9 365 (AMD) with the Intel Core Ultra 9 185H (Intel). Scroll down to the pros and cons of each processor, in-depth specs, and benchmark comparisons.
Overall Comparison
KEY DIFFERENCES OF AMD Ryzen AI 9 365 AND Intel Core Ultra 9 185H
Here’s how AMD Ryzen AI 9 365 and Intel Core Ultra 9 185H stack up against each other in their most impactful areas.
Reasons to consider the AMD Ryzen AI 9 365
-
20% more efficient-core threads (12 vs 10)
-
11% higher E-core base frequency (2000 MHz vs 1800 MHz)
-
6% higher Geekbench V6 multi-core score (14446 vs 13613)
-
15% higher Geekbench V6 single-core score (2823 vs 2446)
-
5% higher PassMark single-core score (3867 vs 3675)
-
25% higher Blender score (250 vs 200)
Reasons to consider the Intel Core Ultra 9 185H
-
10% more CPU threads (22 vs 20)
-
60% more CPU cores (16 vs 10)
-
2% higher P-core turbo frequency (5100 MHz vs 5000 MHz)
-
15% higher E-core turbo frequency (3800 MHz vs 3300 MHz)
-
50% more performance-core threads (12 vs 8)
-
50% more performance cores (6 vs 4)
SPECIFICATION TABLE COMPARISON OF AMD Ryzen AI 9 365 AND Intel Core Ultra 9 185H
Below is the detailed specification table comparing AMD Ryzen AI 9 365 and Intel Core Ultra 9 185H.
Note: Highlighted specs mean that CPU wins that spec row.
If neither side is highlighted, it is a tie or there is not enough data for both specs.
| Specification | AMD Ryzen AI 9 365 | Intel Core Ultra 9 185H |
|---|---|---|
|
General Information
|
||
| CPU Name: | AMD Ryzen AI 9 365 | Intel Core Ultra 9 185H |
| Vendor: | AMD | Intel |
| Release Date: | June 3, 2024 | December 14, 2023 |
| Generation: | Ryzen AI 300 Series | — |
| Type: | Laptop | Laptop |
| Instruction Set: | x86-64 | x86-64 |
| Codename: | Zen 5 (Strix Point) | Meteor Lake |
| Foundry: | TSMC | — |
|
Package and Thermals
|
||
| Manufacturing Process: | 4 nm | 7 nm |
| TDP (PL1): | 15-54 W | 35-65 W |
| Max Boost TDP (PL2): | — | 115 W |
| Socket: | FP8 | FCBGA-2049 |
| Max Temp (TJMax): | 100 C | 110 C |
|
CPU Cores
|
||
|
Total Cores
|
||
| Total Cores | 10 | 16 |
| Total Threads | 20 | 22 |
|
P-Cores
|
||
| P-Cores | 4 | 6 |
| P-Threads | 8 | 12 |
| P-Core Base Frequency | 2000 MHz | 2300 MHz |
| P-Core Turbo Frequency | 5000 MHz | 5100 MHz |
|
E-Cores
|
||
| E-Cores | 6 | 10 |
| E-Threads | 12 | 10 |
| E-Core Base Frequency | 2000 MHz | 1800 MHz |
| E-Core Turbo Frequency | 3300 MHz | 3800 MHz |
|
NPU
|
||
| NPU |
|
|
| NPU TOPS | 50 TOPS | 11 TOPS |
|
Cache and Bus
|
||
| Multiplier | Locked | Locked |
| Bus Frequency | 100 MHz | 100 MHz |
| L1 Cache | 80 KB | 112 KB |
| L2 Cache | 1 MB | 2 MB |
| L3 Cache | 24 MB | 24 MB |
|
Memory Support
|
||
| Memory Types: | DDR5-5600, LPDDR5X-8000 | LPDDR5-7467, LPDDR5x-7467, DDR5-5600 |
| Max Memory Size: | 256 GB | 96 GB |
| Memory Channels: | 2 | 2 |
| Max Memory Bandwidth: | 89.6 GB/s | — |
| ECC Support: |
|
|
| Technologies: | AMD EXPO, AVX-512, BMI1, BMI2, F16C, SHA, XDNA2, Precision Boost 2, Precision Boost Overdrive, SMT, AMD-V, EVP, NX-Bit, SMAP, SMEP | ABM, ADX, AI Boost NPU 3, BMI1, BMI2, CLMUL, DLBoost 3.0, F16C, SHA, VNNI, EIST, TBT 2.0, TBT 3.0, TSX, VT-d, VT-x, RDRAND, TXT, XD bit, vPro |
|
Benchmarks
|
||
|
Geekbench V6
|
||
| Multi-Core | 14446 | 13613 |
| Single-Core | 2823 | 2446 |
| File Compression | 1240 | 1270 |
| Clang Compression | 101 | 103 |
| HTML5 Browser | 297 | 343 |
| PDF Renderer | 438 | 390 |
| Text Processing | 289 | 245 |
| Background Blur | 65 | 45 |
| Photo Processing | 123 | 132 |
| Ray Tracing | 26 | 23 |
|
PassMark CPU
|
||
| Multi-Core | 30354 | 29193 |
| Single-Core | 3867 | 3675 |
| Integer Math | 103700 | 97900 |
| Floating Point | 64700 | 72700 |
| Prime Numbers | 120 | 123 |
| String Sorting | 40600 | 39300 |
| Data Encryption | 18800 | 19700 |
| Data Compression | 370500 | 337200 |
| Physics | 1714 | 1949 |
| Extended Instructions | 26300 | 20100 |
|
Cinebench 2024
|
||
| Multi-Core | 1077 | 987 |
| Single-Core | 117 | 107 |
|
Blender
|
||
| Render Score | 250 | 200 |
Tip: ▲ indicates a higher-is-better spec advantage, while ▼ indicates a lower-is-better advantage.
PERFORMANCE CHART COMPARISON OF AMD Ryzen AI 9 365 AND Intel Core Ultra 9 185H
The charts below visualize how AMD Ryzen AI 9 365 and Intel Core Ultra 9 185H stack up in key performance metrics.
Performance Radar Chart
Performance Benchmarks
Release Timeline of AMD Ryzen AI 9 365 and Intel Core Ultra 9 185H
Intel Core Ultra 9 185H was released 5 months, 20 days earlier than AMD Ryzen AI 9 365.
Value For Money Calculator
Prices use available launch or current data. Enter your own prices to see which CPU gives better value.
AMD Ryzen AI 9 365
Intel Core Ultra 9 185H
Calculating...
Domain Score Summary
Scores are generated by Comparigon's scoring algorithm and are intended as a high-level guide. They may not map 1-to-1 with the individual spec-by-spec comparisons shown in the table.
Our Verdict
In conclusion, the AMD Ryzen AI 9 365 has a narrow overall lead compared to the Intel Core Ultra 9 185H. Its strongest advantages are in Single-Core Performance, Memory Architecture and Energy Efficiency. The Intel Core Ultra 9 185H is the better fit if your top priority is CPU Architecture.
Try to Compare Again One of These CPUs With Another CPU
Pick which CPU to keep, then search for the other CPU to compare.
Disclaimer: Specs, pricing, and benchmarks are sourced from official manufacturer data and verified test results. While we strive for precision, product details and pricing may change. Comparigon may earn an affiliate commission on qualifying purchases.