AMD Ryzen AI 7 450 VS Intel Core Ultra 9 285H
We are comparing the AMD Ryzen AI 7 450 (AMD) with the Intel Core Ultra 9 285H (Intel). Scroll down to the pros and cons of each processor, in-depth specs, and benchmark comparisons.
Overall Comparison
KEY DIFFERENCES OF AMD Ryzen AI 7 450 AND Intel Core Ultra 9 285H
Here’s how AMD Ryzen AI 7 450 and Intel Core Ultra 9 285H stack up against each other in their most impactful areas.
Reasons to consider the AMD Ryzen AI 7 450
-
33% more performance-core threads (8 vs 6)
-
4% higher Blender score (213 vs 205)
Reasons to consider the Intel Core Ultra 9 285H
-
100% more CPU cores (16 vs 8)
-
6% higher P-core turbo frequency (5400 MHz vs 5100 MHz)
-
25% higher E-core turbo frequency (4500 MHz vs 3600 MHz)
-
50% more performance cores (6 vs 4)
-
25% more efficient-core threads (10 vs 8)
-
150% more efficient cores (10 vs 4)
SPECIFICATION TABLE COMPARISON OF AMD Ryzen AI 7 450 AND Intel Core Ultra 9 285H
Below is the detailed specification table comparing AMD Ryzen AI 7 450 and Intel Core Ultra 9 285H.
Note: Highlighted specs mean that CPU wins that spec row.
If neither side is highlighted, it is a tie or there is not enough data for both specs.
| Specification | AMD Ryzen AI 7 450 | Intel Core Ultra 9 285H |
|---|---|---|
|
General Information
|
||
| CPU Name: | AMD Ryzen AI 7 450 | Intel Core Ultra 9 285H |
| Vendor: | AMD | Intel |
| Release Date: | January 5, 2026 | January 6, 2025 |
| Generation: | Ryzen AI 400 Series | Core Ultra (Series 2) |
| Type: | Laptop | Laptop |
| Instruction Set: | x86-64 | x86-64 |
| Codename: | Zen 5 (Gorgon Point) | Arrow Lake |
| Foundry: | TSMC | TSMC |
|
Package and Thermals
|
||
| Manufacturing Process: | 4 nm | 3 nm |
| TDP (PL1): | 15-54 W | 45 W |
| Max Boost TDP (PL2): | — | 115 W |
| Socket: | FP8 | FCBGA-2049 |
| Max Temp (TJMax): | 100 C | 110 C |
|
CPU Cores
|
||
|
Total Cores
|
||
| Total Cores | 8 | 16 |
| Total Threads | 16 | 16 |
|
P-Cores
|
||
| P-Cores | 4 | 6 |
| P-Threads | 8 | 6 |
| P-Core Base Frequency | 2000 MHz | 2900 MHz |
| P-Core Turbo Frequency | 5100 MHz | 5400 MHz |
|
E-Cores
|
||
| E-Cores | 4 | 10 |
| E-Threads | 8 | 10 |
| E-Core Base Frequency | 2000 MHz | 2700 MHz |
| E-Core Turbo Frequency | 3600 MHz | 4500 MHz |
|
NPU
|
||
| NPU |
|
|
| NPU TOPS | 50 TOPS | 13 TOPS |
|
Cache and Bus
|
||
| Multiplier | Locked | Locked |
| Bus Frequency | 100 MHz | 100 MHz |
| L1 Cache | 80 KB | 112 KB |
| L2 Cache | 1 MB | 2 MB |
| L3 Cache | 16 MB | 24 MB |
|
Memory Support
|
||
| Memory Types: | DDR5-5600, LPDDR5X-8533 | LPDDR5-8400, LPDDR5X-8400, DDR5-6400 |
| Max Memory Size: | 256 GB | 128 GB |
| Memory Channels: | 2 | 2 |
| Max Memory Bandwidth: | 89.6 GB/s | — |
| ECC Support: |
|
|
| Technologies: | AES, AMD-V, AVX, AVX2, AVX-512, FMA3, MMX-plus, SHA, SSE, SSE2, SSE3, SSE4.1, SSE4.2, SSE4A, SSSE3, x86-64, Precision Boost 2, Precision Boost Overdrive, SMT | Intel AI Boost, DL Boost, Thread Director, Speed Shift, Turbo Boost Max 3.0, Turbo Boost 2.0, SSE4.1, SSE4.2, AVX2, VT-d, VT-x, TXT, XD bit |
|
Benchmarks
|
||
|
Geekbench V6
|
||
| Multi-Core | 13671 | 17173 |
| Single-Core | 2888 | 2897 |
| File Compression | 1180 | 1510 |
| Clang Compression | 98 | 130 |
| HTML5 Browser | 292 | 426 |
| PDF Renderer | 418 | 523 |
| Text Processing | 304 | 309 |
| Background Blur | 67 | 74 |
| Photo Processing | 125 | 160 |
| Ray Tracing | 23 | 27 |
|
PassMark CPU
|
||
| Multi-Core | 26262 | 34451 |
| Single-Core | 3939 | 4452 |
| Integer Math | 87000 | — |
| Floating Point | 54900 | — |
| Prime Numbers | 90 | — |
| String Sorting | 35000 | — |
| Data Encryption | 15900 | — |
| Data Compression | 323100 | — |
| Physics | 1441 | — |
| Extended Instructions | 23000 | — |
|
Cinebench 2024
|
||
| Multi-Core | 972 | 1122 |
| Single-Core | 118 | 117 |
|
Blender
|
||
| Render Score | 213 | 205 |
Tip: ▲ indicates a higher-is-better spec advantage, while ▼ indicates a lower-is-better advantage.
PERFORMANCE CHART COMPARISON OF AMD Ryzen AI 7 450 AND Intel Core Ultra 9 285H
The charts below visualize how AMD Ryzen AI 7 450 and Intel Core Ultra 9 285H stack up in key performance metrics.
Performance Radar Chart
Performance Benchmarks
Release Timeline of AMD Ryzen AI 7 450 and Intel Core Ultra 9 285H
Intel Core Ultra 9 285H was released 11 months, 30 days earlier than AMD Ryzen AI 7 450.
Value For Money Calculator
Prices use available launch or current data. Enter your own prices to see which CPU gives better value.
AMD Ryzen AI 7 450
Intel Core Ultra 9 285H
Calculating...
Domain Score Summary
Scores are generated by Comparigon's scoring algorithm and are intended as a high-level guide. They may not map 1-to-1 with the individual spec-by-spec comparisons shown in the table.
Our Verdict
In conclusion, the Intel Core Ultra 9 285H edges out overall compared to the AMD Ryzen AI 7 450. Its strongest advantages are in Single-Core Performance, Multi-Core Performance, CPU Architecture and Energy Efficiency. The AMD Ryzen AI 7 450 is the better fit if your top priority is Memory Architecture.
Try to Compare Again One of These CPUs With Another CPU
Pick which CPU to keep, then search for the other CPU to compare.
Disclaimer: Specs, pricing, and benchmarks are sourced from official manufacturer data and verified test results. While we strive for precision, product details and pricing may change. Comparigon may earn an affiliate commission on qualifying purchases.